Conjugate variables

Conjugate variables are pairs of variables mathematically defined in such a way that they become Fourier transform duals,[1][2] or more generally are related through Pontryagin duality. The duality relations lead naturally to an uncertainty relation—in physics called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle—between them. In mathematical terms, conjugate variables are part of a symplectic basis, and the uncertainty relation corresponds to the symplectic form. Also, conjugate variables are related by Noether's theorem, which states that if the laws of physics are invariant with respect to a change in one of the conjugate variables, then the other conjugate variable will not change with time (i.e. it will be conserved). Conjugate variables in thermodynamics are widely used.

Examples

[edit]

There are many types of conjugate variables, depending on the type of work a certain system is doing (or is being subjected to). Examples of canonically conjugate variables include the following:

  • Time and frequency: the longer a musical note is sustained, the more precisely we know its frequency, but it spans a longer duration and is thus a more-distributed event or 'instant' in time. Conversely, a very short musical note becomes just a click, and so is more temporally-localized, but one can't determine its frequency very accurately.[3]
  • Doppler and range: the more we know about how far away a radar target is, the less we can know about the exact velocity of approach or retreat, and vice versa. In this case, the two dimensional function of doppler and range is known as a radar ambiguity function or radar ambiguity diagram.
  • Surface energy: γ dA (γ = surface tension; A = surface area).
  • Elastic stretching: F dL (F = elastic force; L length stretched).
  • Energy and Time: Units being Kg

Derivatives of action

[edit]

In classical physics, the derivatives of action are conjugate variables to the quantity with respect to which one is differentiating. In quantum mechanics, these same pairs of variables are related by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Quantum theory

[edit]

In quantum mechanics, conjugate variables are realized as pairs of observables whose operators do not commute. In conventional terminology, they are said to be incompatible observables. Consider, as an example, the measurable quantities given by position and momentum . In the quantum-mechanical formalism, the two observables and correspond to operators and , which necessarily satisfy the canonical commutation relation:

For every non-zero commutator of two operators, there exists an "uncertainty principle", which in our present example may be expressed in the form:

In this ill-defined notation, and denote "uncertainty" in the simultaneous specification of and . A more precise, and statistically complete, statement involving the standard deviation reads:

More generally, for any two observables and corresponding to operators and , the generalized uncertainty principle is given by:

Now suppose we were to explicitly define two particular operators, assigning each a specific mathematical form, such that the pair satisfies the aforementioned commutation relation. It's important to remember that our particular "choice" of operators would merely reflect one of many equivalent, or isomorphic, representations of the general algebraic structure that fundamentally characterizes quantum mechanics. The generalization is provided formally by the Heisenberg Lie algebra , with a corresponding group called the Heisenberg group .

Fluid mechanics

[edit]

In Hamiltonian fluid mechanics and quantum hydrodynamics, the action itself (or velocity potential) is the conjugate variable of the density (or probability density).

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Heisenberg – Quantum Mechanics, 1925–1927: The Uncertainty Relations". Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2010-08-07.
  2. ^ Hjalmars, S. (1962). "Some remarks on time and energy as conjugate variables". Il Nuovo Cimento. 25 (2): 355–364. Bibcode:1962NCim...25..355H. doi:10.1007/BF02731451. S2CID 120008951.
  3. ^ Mann, S.; Haykin, S. (November 1995). "The chirplet transform: physical considerations" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 43 (11): 2745–2761. Bibcode:1995ITSP...43.2745M. doi:10.1109/78.482123.