List of Mid-South Conference football standings

This is a list of yearly Mid-South Conference football standings.

Mid-South Conference football standings

[edit]

NAIA Division II (1989–1996)

[edit]
1989 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 18 Georgetown (KY) $^ 6 – 0 – 0 7 – 3 – 1
Cumberland (KY) 5 – 1 – 0 7 – 3 – 0
Union (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 5 – 1
Evansville 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 6 – 0
Campbellsville 2 – 3 – 1 2 – 7 – 1
Kentucky Wesleyan 1 – 4 – 1 3 – 6 – 1
Tennessee Wesleyan 0 – 6 – 0 0 – 10 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1990 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 8 Georgetown (KY) $^ 5 – 0 – 0 9 – 2 – 0
No. 24 Cumberland (KY) 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 2 – 1
Campbellsville 3 – 2 – 0 8 – 2 – 0
Union (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 5 – 5 – 0
Evansville 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
Tennessee Wesleyan 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
Lambuth * 0 – 0 – 0 2 – 7 – 0
Cumberland (TN) * 0 – 0 – 0 0 – 8 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
    * – ineligible for conference title
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1991 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 2 Georgetown (KY) $^ 6 – 0 – 0 13 – 1 – 0
No. 21 Campbellsville 4 – 2 – 0 9 – 2 – 0
Union (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 6 – 4 – 0
Evansville 3 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0
Cumberland (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 5 – 0
Lambuth 2 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
Tusculum 0 – 6 – 0 0 – 10 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1992 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 17 Union (KY) + 4 – 1 – 0 8 – 2 – 0
No. 11 Georgetown (KY) +^ 4 – 1 – 0 8 – 3 – 0
No. 20 Campbellsville + 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 3 – 0
Tusculum 2 – 3 – 0 4 – 6 – 0
Cumberland (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
Lambuth 0 – 5 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
  • + – Conference co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1993 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 17 Georgetown (KY) $^ 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 4 – 0
Lambuth 3 – 2 – 0 6 – 4 – 0
Tusculum 2 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0
Union (KY) 2 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0
Cumberland (KY) 2 – 3 – 0 2 – 9 – 0
Campbellsville 1 – 4 – 0 2 – 9 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1994 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 7 Lambuth $^ 4 – 1 – 0 10 – 3 – 0
Tusculum 3 – 2 – 0 7 – 3 – 0
Union (KY) 3 – 2 – 0 7 – 3 – 0
Georgetown (KY) 3 – 2 – 0 3 – 6 – 0
Cumberland (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 5 – 5 – 0
Campbellsville 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1995 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W   L   T W   L   T
No. 4 Lambuth $^ 7 – 0 – 1 10 – 1 – 1
No. 16 Union (KY) 6 – 1 – 1 7 – 2 – 1
Georgetown (KY) 6 – 2 – 0 6 – 4 – 0
Cumberland (KY) 5 – 3 – 0 6 – 4 – 0
Cumberland (TN) 4 – 4 – 0 4 – 6 – 0
Tusculum 3 – 5 – 0 3 – 6 – 0
Campbellsville 2 – 6 – 0 3 – 8 – 0
North Greenville 2 – 6 – 0 5 – 6 – 0
Bethel (TN) 0 – 8 – 0 0 – 10 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll
1996 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 3 Lambuth $^   7 – 0     9 – 2  
No. 18 Cumberland (TN)   6 – 1     8 – 2  
Campbellsville   4 – 3     6 – 4  
North Greenville   3 – 4     6 – 4  
Georgetown (KY)   3 – 4     4 – 5  
Union (KY)   3 – 4     4 – 6  
Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     2 – 7  
Bethel (TN)   1 – 6     2 – 9  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Division II poll

NAIA (1997–present)

[edit]
1997 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 11 Campbellsville +^   5 – 1     7 – 3  
Georgetown (KY) +   5 – 1     5 – 4  
Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     5 – 4  
Cumberland (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5  
Lambuth   2 – 4     4 – 6  
Union (KY)   2 – 4     2 – 8  
North Greenville   0 – 6     1 – 8  
  • + – Conference co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA poll
1998 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 9 Georgetown (KY) +^   6 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 20 North Greenville +   6 – 1     7 – 3  
No. 18 Lambuth   5 – 2     7 – 3  
No. 24 Campbellsville   4 – 3     7 – 4  
Cumberland (TN)   4 – 3     6 – 5  
Belhaven   2 – 5     4 – 6  
Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     3 – 7  
Union (KY)   0 – 7     0 – 10  
  • + – Conference co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA poll
1999 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   7 – 0     13 – 1  
No. 14 Lambuth ^   6 – 1     8 – 4  
North Greenville   5 – 2     5 – 6  
Belhaven   4 – 3     7 – 4  
Campbellsville   2 – 5     2 – 8  
Cumberland (KY)   2 – 5     3 – 8  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     2 – 8  
Union (KY)   0 – 7     0 – 11  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2000 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   8 – 0     14 – 0  
No. 11 Lambuth ^   6 – 1     7 – 4  
No. 17 Campbellsville   5 – 2     7 – 4  
Belhaven   4 – 3     5 – 5  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 5     5 – 5  
Union (KY)   2 – 5     3 – 7  
Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     2 – 8  
North Greenville   0 – 8     0 – 10  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2001 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   7 – 0     14 – 0  
No. 10 Campbellsville ^   5 – 2     10 – 3  
No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     6 – 3  
Belhaven   3 – 4     4 – 6  
Lambuth   3 – 4     3 – 6  
Union (KY)   2 – 4     2 – 7  
Pikeville   2 – 5     3 – 7  
Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     3 – 6  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2002 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 2 Georgetown (KY) $^   8 – 0     12 – 2  
No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   6 – 2     6 – 4  
Lambuth   5 – 3     6 – 4  
Pikeville   4 – 4     6 – 4  
Belhaven   4 – 4     5 – 5  
Campbellsville   3 – 5     4 – 6  
Cumberland (KY)   3 – 5     4 – 6  
Virginia–Wise   2 – 6     3 – 7  
Union (KY)   1 – 7     2 – 8  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2003 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 11 Georgetown (KY) +^   8 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 10 Lambuth +^   8 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 16 Campbellsville   7 – 2     9 – 2  
No. 20 Cumberland (KY)   7 – 2     8 – 2  
Pikeville   3 – 6     4 – 6  
Union (KY)   3 – 6     4 – 7  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 6     3 – 7  
Belhaven   2 – 7     4 – 7  
Virginia–Wise   2 – 7     3 – 8  
Bethel (TN)   2 – 7     2 – 9  
  • + – Conference co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2004 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 3 Georgetown (KY) $^   10 – 0     12 – 1  
No. 23 Pikeville   8 – 2     8 – 3  
No. 16 Cumberland (KY)   7 – 3     8 – 3  
Lambuth   6 – 4     6 – 4  
Campbellsville   5 – 5     6 – 5  
Bethel (TN)   5 – 5     5 – 7  
Kentucky Wesleyan   4 – 6     4 – 7  
Union (KY)   4 – 6     4 – 7  
Belhaven   3 – 7     4 – 7  
Virginia–Wise   3 – 7     3 – 8  
Cumberland (TN)   0 – 10     0 – 10  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2005 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 5 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     9 – 3  
No. 21 Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 2     8 – 3  
No. 15 Pikeville ^   3 – 2     7 – 3  
Union (KY)   3 – 2     4 – 6  
Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     4 – 7  
Shorter   0 – 5     2 – 8  
West Division
No. 23 Bethel (TN) x   5 – 0     7 – 4  
Belhaven   3 – 2     5 – 6  
Lambuth   3 – 2     5 – 6  
Kentucky Wesleyan   2 – 3     3 – 7  
Campbellsville   2 – 3     2 – 8  
Cumberland (TN)   0 – 5     2 – 8  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2006 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 10 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     9 – 2  
No. 24 Virginia–Wise   3 – 2     8 – 3  
Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 2     6 – 4  
Pikeville   2 – 3     4 – 6  
Union (KY)   1 – 4     2 – 8  
West Virginia Tech   1 – 4     1 – 10  
West Division
No. 7 Bethel (TN) x^†   5 – 0     10 – 3  
Belhaven   4 – 1     6 – 5  
Shorter   3 – 2     6 – 5  
Lambuth   1 – 4     4 – 7  
Cumberland (TN)   1 – 4     3 – 7  
Campbellsville   1 – 4     2 – 8  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
    † – Bethel forfeited all ten wins, including games against seven Mid-South teams.
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2007 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 14 Virginia–Wise x   4 – 1     10 – 2  
No. 16 Cumberlands (KY) x^   4 – 1     8 – 3  
No. 24 Georgetown (KY)   3 – 2     6 – 4  
Pikeville   2 – 3     4 – 7  
Union (KY)   2 – 3     4 – 7  
West Virginia Tech   0 – 5     1 – 10  
West Division
No. 5 Bethel (TN) x^   5 – 0     11 – 2  
Shorter   3 – 2     7 – 4  
Belhaven   3 – 2     5 – 6  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     3 – 7  
Lambuth   2 – 3     3 – 8  
Campbellsville   0 – 5     0 – 10  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2008 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 6 Cumberlands (KY) x^   6 – 0     10 – 2  
No. 10 Union (KY) ^   5 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 19 Virginia–Wise   4 – 2     8 – 3  
Georgetown (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5  
Campbellsville   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Pikeville   1 – 5     2 – 9  
West Virginia Tech   0 – 6     0 – 11  
West Division
No. 11 Shorter x^   4 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 15 Lambuth x^   4 – 1     8 – 4  
Cumberland (TN) x   4 – 1     6 – 5  
Belhaven   2 – 3     4 – 6  
Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     2 – 9  
Faulkner   0 – 5     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2009 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 11 Cumberlands (KY) x^   5 – 1     9 – 2  
Campbellsville   4 – 2     7 – 4  
Georgetown (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 4  
Virginia–Wise   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Union (KY)   3 – 3     4 – 6  
Pikeville   1 – 5     3 – 8  
West Virginia Tech   0 – 6     3 – 8  
West Division
No. 7 Lambuth x^   6 – 0     12 – 1  
Belhaven   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Bethel (TN)   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Shorter   3 – 3     6 – 5  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 6  
Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     1 – 9  
Faulkner   0 – 6     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2010 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 14 Georgetown (KY) x^   6 – 0     8 – 3  
Campbellsville   5 – 1     7 – 5  
Lindsey Wilson   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Virginia–Wise   3 – 3     3 – 8  
Pikeville   2 – 4     2 – 8  
West Virginia Tech   1 – 5     2 – 9  
Kentucky Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11  
West Division
No. 19 Cumberlands (KY) x^   5 – 1     7 – 4  
No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     8 – 3  
Union (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 4  
Bethel (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 5  
Shorter   2 – 4     5 – 6  
Faulkner   2 – 4     3 – 7  
Belhaven   1 – 5     4 – 7  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2011 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 4 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     12 – 1  
Lindsey Wilson   3 – 2     7 – 3  
Campbellsville   3 – 2     7 – 5  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 3     4 – 7  
Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     5 – 6  
Pikeville   1 – 4     4 – 6  
West Division
No. 14 Bethel (TN) x^   5 – 1     8 – 3  
No. 25 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     7 – 3  
No. 24 Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 3  
Shorter   3 – 3     6 – 4  
Belhaven   3 – 3     5 – 6  
Faulkner   1 – 5     3 – 7  
Union (KY)   1 – 5     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2012 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 8 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     10 – 1  
No. 7 Cumberlands (KY) ^   4 – 1     10 – 2  
No. 25 Kentucky Christian   3 – 2     7 – 4  
Union (KY)   1 – 4     4 – 7  
Pikeville   1 – 4     3 – 8  
Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     3 – 8  
West Division
No. 9 Bethel (TN) x^   6 – 0     9 – 4  
No. 19 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     8 – 3  
Belhaven   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Faulkner   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Campbellsville   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Lindsey Wilson   1 – 5     3 – 8  
Bluefield   0 – 6     0 – 11  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2013 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 2 Cumberlands (KY) x^   6 – 0     13 – 1  
No. 12 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     7 – 4  
No. 19 Lindsey Wilson   3 – 3     8 – 3  
Pikeville   3 – 3     7 – 4  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Union (KY)   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Bluefield   0 – 6     0 – 11  
West Division
No. 10 Faulkner x^   4 – 1     9 – 3  
Reinhardt x   4 – 1     6 – 4  
No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   3 – 2     7 – 4  
Campbellsville   3 – 2     4 – 6  
Belhaven   1 – 4     3 – 8  
Bethel (TN)   0 – 5     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2014 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 7 Lindsey Wilson x^   6 – 0     10 – 3  
No. 11 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     8 – 3  
Pikeville   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     5 – 6  
Cumberlands (KY)   2 – 4     3 – 7  
Bluefield   1 – 5     3 – 8  
Union (KY)   1 – 5     1 – 9  
West Division
No. 10 Faulkner x^   4 – 1     9 – 3  
No. 14 Campbellsville x^   4 – 1     7 – 4  
Reinhardt   3 – 2     6 – 4  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     6 – 5  
Bethel (TN)   2 – 3     5 – 6  
Belhaven   0 – 5     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2015 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 25 Georgetown (KY) x   5 – 0     6 – 4  
Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 1     7 – 3  
Pikeville   3 – 2     4 – 7  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 3     2 – 9  
Union (KY)   1 – 4     1 – 9  
Bluefield   0 – 5     1 – 10  
West Division
No. 11 Campbellsville x^   5 – 0     8 – 3  
No. 10 Reinhardt ^   4 – 1     9 – 2  
No. 13 Lindsey Wilson ^   3 – 2     8 – 3  
No. 23 Faulkner   2 – 3     7 – 3  
Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     4 – 7  
Cumberland (TN)   0 – 5     3 – 8  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2016 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
East Division
No. 25 Georgetown (KY) x   5 – 1     7 – 4  
Pikeville x   5 – 1     6 – 5  
Union (KY)   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 3     4 – 6  
Kentucky Christian   3 – 3     3 – 8  
Bluefield   1 – 5     1 – 10  
Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11  
West Division
No. 3 Reinhardt x^   5 – 0     13 – 1  
No. 8 Lindsey Wilson ^   4 – 1     11 – 2  
Faulkner   3 – 2     6 – 4  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     5 – 6  
Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     7 – 4  
Campbellsville   0 – 5     2 – 8  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2017 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
Appalachian Division
No. 2 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     12 – 1  
Bluefield   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 3     6 – 4  
Union (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5  
Pikeville   3 – 3     5 – 6  
Point   1 – 5     3 – 8  
St. Andrews   1 – 5     2 – 8  
Bluegrass Division
No. 5 Lindsey Wilson x^   6 – 0     11 – 1  
No. 7 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     9 – 2  
No. 20 Campbellsville   4 – 2     8 – 2  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     7 – 4  
Bethel (TN)   2 – 4     3 – 7  
Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     1 – 10  
Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11  
Sun Division
No. 10 Southeastern x^   5 – 0     8 – 2  
No. 22 Faulkner   4 – 1     7 – 3  
Webber International   3 – 2     5 – 4  
Warner   2 – 3     4 – 6  
Ave Maria   1 – 4     2 – 8  
Edward Waters   0 – 5     0 – 10  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2018 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
Appalachian Division
No. 11 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 2  
No. 12 Cumberlands (KY) ^   5 – 1     10 – 2  
Pikeville   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Point   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Bluefield   1 – 4     4 – 7  
St. Andrews   1 – 4     2 – 7  
Union (KY)   1 – 5     2 – 8  
Bluegrass Division
No. 10 Bethel (TN) x^   6 – 0     10 – 1  
No. 19 Georgetown (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 3  
No. 18 Lindsey Wilson   4 – 2     7 – 3  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 6  
Campbellsville   3 – 3     4 – 6  
Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     2 – 9  
Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11  
Sun Division
No. 21 Southeastern x   5 – 1     7 – 3  
Ave Maria x   5 – 1     6 – 4  
Keiser   4 – 2     6 – 4  
Webber International   3 – 3     7 – 3  
Edward Waters   2 – 4     4 – 7  
Faulkner   1 – 5     4 – 6  
Warner   1 – 5     1 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2019 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
Appalachian Division
No. 13 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 3  
St. Andrews   5 – 1     5 – 5  
Point   4 – 2     5 – 7  
Bluefield   3 – 3     4 – 7  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Cincinnati Christian *   1 – 5     2 – 9  
Union (KY)   0 – 6     0 – 11  
Bluegrass Division
No. 4 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     12 – 1  
No. 7 Cumberlands (KY) ^   6 – 1     10 – 2  
Pikeville   4 – 3     6 – 5  
Georgetown (KY)   4 – 3     5 – 5  
Cumberland (TN)   3 – 4     5 – 5  
Bethel (TN)   2 – 5     5 – 6  
Thomas More   2 – 5     4 – 7  
Campbellsville   0 – 7     1 – 9  
Sun Division
No. 9 Keiser x^   6 – 0     9 – 1  
No. 15 Southeastern   5 – 1     8 – 1  
Ave Maria   3 – 3     5 – 5  
St. Thomas (FL)   2 – 4     4 – 6  
Webber International   2 – 4     3 – 6  
Warner   2 – 4     3 – 7  
Faulkner   1 – 5     3 – 6  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
    * – Cincinnati Christian announced its closure mid-season and forfeited its three remaining games.
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2020 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
Appalachian Division
No. 8 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 1  
Faulkner   5 – 1     6 – 2  
Kentucky Christian   4 – 2     6 – 2  
St. Andrews   2 – 3     3 – 3  
Union (KY)   1 – 4     1 – 6  
Bluefield   1 – 5     2 – 7  
Point   1 – 5     1 – 7  
Bluegrass Division
No. 1 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     11 – 0  
No. 13 Georgetown (KY) ^   6 – 1     6 – 2  
Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 3     4 – 3  
Bethel (TN)   3 – 4     3 – 4  
Pikeville   3 – 4     3 – 4  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     2 – 5  
Thomas More   2 – 5     2 – 5  
Campbellsville   1 – 6     1 – 6  
Sun Division
No. 4 Keiser x^   5 – 0     9 – 1  
Southeastern   3 – 1     5 – 1  
St. Thomas (FL)   3 – 2     4 – 3  
Ave Maria   2 – 3     3 – 4  
Warner   1 – 3     2 – 4  
Webber International   1 – 5     1 – 7  
Florida Memorial   0 – 1     0 – 3  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2021 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
Appalachian Division
No. 6 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 3  
No. 24 Faulkner   5 – 1     8 – 2  
Bluefield   4 – 2     6 – 5  
Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8  
Point   2 – 4     2 – 8  
St. Andrews   2 – 4     2 – 9  
Union (KY)   0 – 6     1 – 9  
Bluegrass Division
No. 1 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     12 – 1  
No. 15 Georgetown (KY)   5 – 2     8 – 2  
Bethel (TN)   4 – 3     7 – 4  
Thomas More   4 – 3     5 – 5  
Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 4     6 – 4  
Pikeville   2 – 5     4 – 6  
Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     3 – 7  
Campbellsville   1 – 6     1 – 8  
Sun Division
No. 11 Keiser x^   5 – 1     9 – 3  
Southeastern x   5 – 1     8 – 3  
St. Thomas (FL)   4 – 2     9 – 2  
Ave Maria   4 – 2     5 – 6  
Warner   1 – 5     3 – 8  
Webber International   1 – 5     2 – 8  
Florida Memorial   1 – 5     2 – 9  
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2022 Mid-South Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team   W   L     W   L  
No. 4 Bethel (TN) $^   8 – 0     11 – 1  
No. 8 Lindsey Wilson ^   7 – 1     10 – 2  
No. 21 Georgetown (KY)   5 – 3     7 – 3  
Pikeville   5 – 3     6 – 4  
Thomas More   4 – 4     5 – 6  
Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 5     5 – 5  
Faulkner   3 – 5     4 – 7  
Cumberland (TN)   1 – 7     3 – 7  
Campbellsville   0 – 8     2 – 8  
  • $ – Conference champion
  • ^ – NAIA playoff participant
Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll

References

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Mid-South_Conference_football_standings&oldid=1125233791"