Template talk:Elections in Ohio sidebar

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Ohio This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles This template is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

A horizontal version of this template should be created for placement at the foot of the page. There is no reason why, for example, a template containing lists of recent municipal elections for three large cites need appear at the top of the page, as in United States Senate election in Ohio, 1898. The subjects are far afield from each other. WP:NAVBOX suggests that a location at the end of the article would be better. Can someone experienced in template creation make such a version, or convert this one? Kablammo (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what the problem with current version is. It certainly doesn't take a lot of real estate on any page. Vertical presentation seems to work better than horizontal for this particular group of articles as far as I am concerned. Also, some of these lists are kind of long, and navboxes at bottom would get lost.
Roseohioresident (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two points:

• A succession of navboxes at the top may not be lost, but will both damage the appearance and promote the least useful parts of an article to the most prominent. Navboxes and other templates seem to increase with time, and if placed at the top will be a distraction.
• From WP:NAVBOX:

  Navigation templates located in the top-right corner of articles (sometimes called a "sidebar" or "part of a series" template) should be treated with special attention, because they are so prominently displayed to readers. The collection of articles in a sidebar template should be fairly tightly related, and the template should meet most or all of the preceding guidelines. If the articles are not tightly related, a footer template (located at the bottom of the article) may be more appropriate.

  I don't think 21st-century municipal elections in Columbus are "tightly related" to a 19th-century legislative election of a US senator.

The section linked by WP:NAVBOX contains a good discussion of the questions at issue here. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to create a horizontal navbox, please leave this template alone and give navbox a slightly different name. That way, options are still available.
Roseohioresident (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Elections in Alabama which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]