User talk:AppoWeb

Hi AppoWeb! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 01:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you tagged Ida Elise Enget for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. It is extremely difficult to believe this tag was applied in good faith. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 18:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: I checked the only link to the source in the article and saw that the link is inactive, so I tagged it sabotage Check the link in the article yourself. AP ^(Talk) 19:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was a stupid thing to do. There were two pages linked in the article, and you say you only checked one. And then you jumped to the unfounded conclusion of "sabotage" without checking to see whether the problem was simply a formatting error by a new editor. And I did check, and saw that both links were working. Should I conclude that your edit was "sabotage" rather stupid and irresponsible. Let's be blunt. You've been actively editing for two days, and most if not all of your substantive deletion proposals have been quite wrong. It's time for you to lean back and learn what you're doing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz:My friend, why are you angry? I said to myself, I made a mistake, I am a newcomer, you should not greet me with a stick. This is a mistake from Wikipedia. What did you do? You speak insultingly to me.--AP ^(Talk) 20:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: You attacked me personally, as you know, a newcomer, and this is against the law.AP ^(Talk) 20:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: And make me one (That was a stupid thing to do).AP ^(Talk) 21:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, stop whining and throwing yourself a pity party. I'm not really saying anything other editors haven't already been telling you. ("Please stop nominating articles for deletion without providing a rationale or performing a WP:BEFORE search. It is highly disruptive."[1]. If you keep not getting the message, it will be delivered more and more strongly. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 22:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Blablubbs. I have come across a few of your edits that have raised similar concerns for me as for Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. First off, I came across two edits where you reverted other users' contributions without any explanation, despite the edits clearly not being vandalism. ([2] [3]). Then there are your nominations at WP:AFD, which all resulted in speedy keeps because you gave what amounts to no reason for your nominations ([4] [5] [6]). In addition, you placed clearly invalid speedy deletion requests on multiple articles ([7] [8] [9] [10]) and falsely claimed to have a user right you do not have ([11]). When people challenged you about this, you have generally resorted to directing them to WP:NEWCOMER. While it is true that Wikipedia and certain tools (like Twinkle) can be confusing for new users, that is not a good explanation for such a high error rate. If you have trouble using Twinkle, please just disable it and try to gain some experience and familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines first. This tutorial is a good starting point for newcomers.

Thank you, — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs:Okay, I'm not using Twinkle anymore, but this user has insulted me. Is his work right?AP ^(Talk) 22:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AppoWeb, after a glance at Hullaballoo Wolfowitz' contributions page, I don't have any concerns about their work. I do however have two questions for you: 1) Would you mind explaining the reasoning behind [this] unexplained revert which you made after acknowledging my message above? And 2) is this your first account here on Wikipedia? — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs:I use RTRC for my reversals. Is this also a problem? Do you want to deactivate Elaine or leave know why you treat me badly with a stick.You treat all newcomers the same way. Do you think I should not learn? I should not know that you were not wrong from day one?Instead of humiliating me, teach me a little. You were like me on the first day, maybe worse than me.AP ^(Talk) 22:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs:My friend, this is my only account, do you doubt it?You can request an inspection I have no problem If I had an account on Wiki before, I would definitely edit it better so that you do not humiliate me and because of your friendship with someone who told me that you are stupid and you are harassing me.Do you want me to leave the wiki and keep the wiki for yourself?If you want to say that, I will leave the wiki myself so that your place will be more openAP ^(Talk) 23:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AppoWeb, The problem isn't with what tools you use, but with the edits that you make using them. If other editors are not confident that you are making good decisions – assisted by tools or not – then that will lead to messages like the ones you received today. This has nothing to do whatsoever with your status as a newcomer; it has to do with people assuming good faith on your part and bringing concerns to your talk page which you have so far failed to address constructively. Considering your elaborate userpage and the fact that you regularly cite policies like WP:NPA and WP:NEWCOMER, I also have a hard time believing that you are as unfamiliar with Wikipedia as you claim. Finally, I don't know what you are reffering to with this because of your friendship with someone who told me that you are stupid and you are harassing me. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs:My friend, I understand my mistakes and I will not repeat them. Please end this discussion. Your messages are bothering me. Stop humiliating me.AP ^(Talk) 23:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you've been dropping welcome templates on user talk pages. In all but the last of 6 of these, the user hadn't made a single edit, and in one case, you left a welcome template that was designed for someone with trouble in English, despite them having made no edits. This shouldn't really be done; you might want to check out WP:Welcoming committee for good practices. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deacon Vorbis:Yes, my eyes will leave a simple pattern if I want to say hello. I mentioned it with Twinkle and it was not manual, my friend.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 01:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not your friend, and your response makes no sense. It seems that you don't possess the necessary proficiency with English to communicate effectively here. Might I suggest sticking to minor edits only or contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language? Based on the many problems you've run into in just the few short days you've had this account, I suspect it won't be long before you wind up blocked from editing if you continue to try to do things that you don't really understand yet. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deacon Vorbis:Mr. Deacon Vorbis, I respect you and I addressed my friend. Respecting you causes you discomfort. I'm sorry for you. I am fluent in English. You are the third person to make a personal attack. From you in front. And you do not have the right to edit my talk page. If you do this again I will report to the administrators.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 02:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not fluent in English; calling a stranger "friend" in English is generally pretty rude and presumptuous. I have made no personal attack against you. I've left this notice (as have others) as a courtesy to you to help you understand the problems that you've run into so far. I would strongly suggest you heed these warnings. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deacon Vorbis:Mr. Deacon Vorbis,So why don't friends on Wiki get upset anymore? This is a free encyclopedia. It's not yours.Your harassment is also unbearable because it is because of a few greetings that I sent through the system itself and you misused this issue to attack me.And there is no reason for you to determine for me whether I am fluent in the language or not because it is not relevant to you.by Thankful.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 02:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AppoWeb. You are making some terrible reversions of IP edits without leaving an edit summary as to why. Such reversions should only be performed if there is good reason. Examples include [12], [13], [14], and almost certainly [15]. If you are going to continue with reversions, please only do so well within your level of understanding/comprehension, and leave an edit summary except where something is absolutely obvious as vandalism. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide:Okey Thank you.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 15:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armin 2AFM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Armin 2AFM, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AppoWeb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi, what happend? here we want to do a project together ! :)) is your account Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry ?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361:I do not know why my account was closed, although I have not done anything at all, I am active here, do not worry, we will do this project together.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 18:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361:It does not matter because my goal is to help the system and even by closing here I will create a new account and request a clean start because I did not do anything at all or I did not have an account and I will no longer work in Persian.--Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 18:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361: هموطنان ایرانیانمان انقدر حسود هستند نمیخواهند کسی تکیه بر جای ان ها بزند بگذارید انها جایشان را سفت کنند این نامهربانی ها شامل حال شما هم شده و ب شما همک تهمت زده اند بگذریم ما کارمان را می کنیم--Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 18:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361: بی زحمت پست الکترونیکیتان را ب من بدهید در انجا ارتباط بگیریم بهتر است تا دوباره بی دلیل حساب مارا نبندند محرمانه باشد بهترهست--Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 18:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

..ولی فارسیتون بهتر شد از دیشب تا حالا..حیف شد!--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361: چگونه بهتر شده تغییری در زبان من رخ نداده و همانصورت همیشگی است.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 19:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojtaba2361: If you can put the list here for me to create.Ap ^{(Talk • contribs)} 19:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]