User talk:AramaeanSyriac

You changed the number of Syriac population from 40,000 to 80,000 in Stockholm County. Can you proof it? Add sources! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pariiiisssian (talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In sweden there is 80.000 Syriacs, with a source at the end of the text. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Aramaean, I didn't wanted to get into an edit war, but I suggest we continue to discuss the issue (if desired) in the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac). If you need help with anything, please let me know. Chaldean (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please join us in Wikipedia:Assyrian-Syriac_wikipedia_cooperation_board and list your name under Participations. Chaldean (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, a while back ago, I started all these Syrianska football pages, but I couldn't find much English information on each club to expand the articles. Perhaps you can do a little work on them. Chaldean (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem my brother :) AramaeanSyriac (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was my mistake. Please don't hesitate to correct me when I make mistakes. Chaldean (talk) 19:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to say that you are a great fresh breath of air here in Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. Chaldean (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes As for all articles entitled "Assyrians/Syriacs in X" they should be moved. As for Assyrians in Turkey, I'm moving it just to be safe - I found it doubtful you can have an article about modern-day Assyrians that is not consequently about modern-day Syriacs. The entire nomenclature between Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Syriacs really needs to be cleared up somehow, but I'm not enough of an expert to fix it myself. Let me know if you have any more questions for me. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop destroying the Assyrians pages! if you want to describe us like Assyrians/Syriacs then why do you only speak about the arameans in the arameans-syriac page?! The Western Assyrians-Syriacs are not only descirbing themselve as arameans so its your choice —Preceding unsigned comment added by WestAssyrian (talk • contribs) 10:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont change the Assyrian people page! you and the other arameans can write about the aramean-syriac Im going to make a article about the Western Assyians (also called Assyrian-Syriacs) you are arameans and we are the assyrians so stop destroying the assyrian pages! WestAssyrian (talk —Preceding comment was added at 16:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for this kind of language. Please try to work together. Chaldean (talk) 16:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chaldean/ I want to work with ArameanSyriac but he just change every Assyrian word to Syriac or Aramean! the Syriac term is only refering to the Assyrian-Aramean people belonging to the Syriac Church so its not enough to only describe us Syriacs! Assyrian/Syriac/Chaldeans there are 3 groups so how can the Syriac term refering to the whole group?? the Syriac term isnt a ethnic term its the name of one church! The Assyrian term is ethnic --WestAssyrian (talk) 17:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing seriously?? be neutral! I havent done anything wrong with the Assyrian people page! I have only added some facts! so stop with your Aramaen propaganda! --WestAssyrian (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AramaeanSyriac - you wrote: I wonder if you could move all articles in category Syriacs to category Syriac people ?

To be honest, it's as easy for you to do that as it is for me, since I change categories manually. It would be easier if you requested that someone who uses an automated bot did this (there is a page to request such help - Wikipedia:Bot requests). Hope that helps, Grutness...wha? 11:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you were going to do it by hand, you'd simply edit each page to change the category link at the bottom of the page (like I've done with this one here. If you mean you don't know how to make a bot request, simply add a new section to the bottom of Wikipedia:Bot_requests asking for all articles marked with Category:Syriacs to have that link changed to Category:Syriac people. Grutness...wha? 13:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khon, unfortunatly, I have been very busy these and as I am unable to work on Wikipedia right. I ask of you to work 'together with WestAssryian or anybody else. When working together, we can accomplish anything. When I have time, I will come back to Wiki's projects. For the mean time, communicate with each other here; Wikipedia_talk:Assyrian-Syriac_wikipedia_cooperation_board#Problems. Shlomo. Chaldean (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have moved your comments on WestAssyrian's talkpage to the discussion board. Please continue talking about the issue over there. Thanks. Chaldean (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This all out war you and WestAssyrian are have having is not improving pages. Like I said before, discuss each issue in the board Wikipedia talk:Assyrian-Syriac wikipedia cooperation board. We wont accomplish anything by RVing every 5 minutes. Chaldean (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahono, Chaldean is just the same as WestAssyrian, adding Assyrian in every article trying to put the Syriac name into shadows. The only differnece between him and WestAssyrian is that he knows English, which cannot be told about WestAssyrian. With that said, he still lacks reading comprehension. The TriZ (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You "Triz" obviously is not part of the solution as you have constantly insulted users and continue to not contribute positively. Chaldean (talk) 13:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me, insulted anyone? Whatever. I've done my contributions, i've been for example rewarded historian of the week in Swedish wiki, and i've also created some articles here in enwiki. But unfortunetly my time and power goes to cleaning after you and your friends. The TriZ (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please go back to Swedish Wiki then. Obviously your not part of the solution. AramaeanSyriac, I'd like your take at Talk:Aramean-Syriac_people#Population_numbers. Chaldean (talk) 13:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey did you check out the source? [[1]] it says 37K not 900K. Chaldean (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend i just changed it, how come you are not willing to cooperate anymore with me?AramaeanSyriac (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What? :D thats silly, I just corrected what the source was saying. There isn't 900,000 Syriacs in Lebanon, but 37,000 like the source says. Chaldean (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okey im sorry for that but it said 37,000 but then i think a lebanese changed that im not really sure. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey khon, I think we need to create a roadmap or a guideline (Rules) for all these issues that we are dealing with. Please give me your opinion on the following; Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac)#Setting_rules.2Fguidelines. Chaldean (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please please don't forget about this. Chaldean (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aramaic Music Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 09:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Du har ett meddelande på User talk:WestAssyrian#Hej svenskar. --LA2 (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okej, vad tycker du att man kan lägga in mer? The TriZ (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gave this article some cleaning, as you requested a month ago. Sorry it took so long for me to get to it. If you have any questions, please visit my talk page again. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vad tror du om att skapa en "Aramean-Syriac diaspora" artikel? Tycker du det behövs? För isf, kan jag enkelt påbörja artikeln så bygger vi på sen. The TriZ (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A absolut jag har inget emot det. Men grejen e alla dom här artiklarna som finns Assyrains and syriacs in ISrael, sweden, Syria, Germany etc så borde det även vara en gemensam artikel för diasporna. Tex assyrian and Syriac diasproa. vad tycker du? AramaeanSyriac (talk) 10:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Det funkar ju också, men då måste man byta namn på artikeln, och ändra det mesta av innehållet, frågan är ju då om andra kommer gå med på det. Egentligen är väl det smartast med tanke på dem artiklarna som du säger, men å andra sidan finns det två olika huvudartiklar, en för assyrier och en för syrianer, och olika siffror i befolkning. Men det går säkert att lösa... The TriZ (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jag tycker att vi ska fixa en egen artikel AramaeanSyriac (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Förslag på titelnamn? Vet du hur man skapar kategorier? The TriZ (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bästa vore ju Syriac diaspora. Skriv en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:NAMNET PÅ KATEGORIN och sen tryck på start article. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tack, gjorde en för "Syriac diaspora", ska försöka fixa en kategori senare för "People of Syriac desent". Men såg att det saknades en artikel för Belgien, så tänkte göra en "Syriacs in Belgium", och hittade lite sidor www.arameensliege.be och www.suryoye.be/, men vet du vad som gäller för bilder? Dem hade i arameensliege lite bilder på från nån protest mot Seyfo som man kunde lägga upp möjligtvis... The TriZ (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

De e copyright på dom bilderna. man får inte ta bilder o ladda upp hit, man måste ha tillåtelse först. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 21:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, förstår det. Men vad räknas som tillåtelse? Räcker det med att be sidan om tillåtelse eller? Fast det är skitsamma, behövs inte. Tänkte bara att att balansera upp det lite, med tanke på att i alla artiklar så har dem lagt upp bilder på assyrier med "folkkläder" och liknande. The TriZ (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Äh ta de säkra före de osäkra. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herregud! Var det verkligen nödvändigt med en "Syriac Genocide"-artikel? Tack för att ni fortsätter splittra vårat folk! Shmayo (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Det är "ni" som ska ha tacket för det. The TriZ (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exakt, ni skall ha tacket för att ha splittrat vårat folk från första början. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The Syriac flag has it history when André Dupont-Sommer made diggings in the historical Aramaean village Tell-Khalaf,Syria in the beginning of the 19th century." Ska det vara 1800-talet eller borde det inte vara 1900-talet? La tidigare idag lite info om Örebro Syrianska på svenska wiki, om du orkar översätta det kan du lägga in det här också. Ska försöka lägga in lite om Syrianska FCs historia, men det blir nog om ett par dagar... The TriZ (talk) 23:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jag ska försöka kolla igenom lite senare, men min engelska är ju inget vidare bra heller, tyvärr. Man kanske borde be någon kolla igenom och förbättra engelskan (om det nu behövs), Benne har gett mig ett intryck om att han är duktig på engelska, man kanske borde kolla med honom om han har tid och intresse? Bra sen att du försöker få artikeln till en "Good article", ska försöka hjälpa dig så gott jag kan... The TriZ (talk) 23:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tyvärr har de raderat artikeln, men förmodligen kommer den nuvarande assyriska artikeln flyttas till dubbelbeteckningen? Vad tycker du om det? The TriZ (talk) 00:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See this [[2]] Chaldean (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, have you ever thought about writing a Wikipedia:Good Article? Its articles like this that will interest people to read about our people. I know you have worked really hard, but I think you should start concenrtating in one single article and put all of your effort to it. Then nominate it for a good article candidate. Let me know if you need any help. Chaldean (talk) 23:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahono, If you're interested in editing the Al-Malikiyah article please do it responsibly and not arbitrarily, exaggerate, dismiss, any ethnic presence in the town. Also include a description of your edits and additions; and clarify your reasons for doing so.

Thanks Ac1899 (talk) 01:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Aramaeans are an extinct peoples. They simply do not exist so stop your incompetent edits and meaningless bickering. Your arguments are futile we might as well start arguing that kurds are really medes and the arabs are really moabites or the maronites are really phoenicians. Do you not see the point. I am a student of the Syriac institute and all the linguistic specialists I speak with on this matter dismiss your invalid claims. If you want to discuss this matter provide some data repudiated by professional scholars on the topic. I have been in the linguistics for over a decade and I have never heard of the term Aramaean other than the fact that they died out long ago and that the reality of them being alive to this day is absurd if not historically bias. I am of German Nationality and for me to argue that I am really a Nordic, or Hun, or a Visogoth is absurd likewise with your impotent claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.17.218.44 (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first source is from the Houses of Parliament in the UK, which talks of a Syriac language and of Chaldeans being Catholic Assyrians. The next source (BBC) talks of a Syriac Monk in an article about Assyrians. Now join the debate, don't simply hate and remove without reasoning. Gabr-el 23:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still nothing about Syriacs. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im warning you. Stop your edits to the Assyrian page, or I will add facts to the Aramaean Syriac bull crap article of yours. Gabr-el 22:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep out of the Assyrian page or I will edit back yours. Do not mess with me. Gabr-el 23:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop redirecting the Assyrian people page to a less-informative page without consensus on the article's talk page. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 23:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Assyrian people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly removing text like 1, 2, 3, and 4, along with this redirect is not appreciated. You have nothing but a history of hostile editing. One more revert or anything like that again and you are gone. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are now seriously pushing it. Be aware that you are close to reaching the limit of what Wikipedia tends to tolerate, and not far away from a permanent ban. Once you are given a permanent ban, you will be prevented from editing any part of Wikipedia, under any name. --dab (𒁳) 12:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you look at Image:-universalsyriacscout.png and see if you can make out what it says? It probably says something like "Be Prepared", or "Always Prepared", and I have need of the text. Thank you! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With all do kindness, I am just monitoring several users in the dispute. I personally dont care what his ethnicity is but here are the problems with your recent edits.

• You claim he is Aramaean-Syriac, thats fine however there is absolutely no evidence saying he is, if there is please by all means provide it
• Second ,The link you provide to support your view does not state Khalil Gibran anywhere in the article, it simply just states that all maronites are syriacs syrians
• As long as you provide viable sources saying he is I dont care, but you must admit the source you gave has no mention of him anywhere in the article, Ninevite (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then please, read the source again. And stop WP:STALKing me. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The web page you link to at the start of this article does not support your claim that this city is "Syriac": it clearly states that at one time most of the inhabitants were Aramean, not Syriac. Further, it notes that the numbers of Aramaic people living in that town dwindled until today there are none; so to use this source to support that it is a "Syriac" town is misrepresenting what it actually says. As far as I know, because it lies inside modern-day Turkey its inhabitants are Turkish, or perhaps Kurdish, it would be far more accurate to say it is a "Turkish" or "Kurdish" town -- & I would expect someone from Turkey who is as proud of heritage as you are of yours would engage in a destructive edit war over that. So I'm reverting it back to more neutral language.

Normally, I'd be inclined to assume this was a mistake due to pride in your ethnic heritage, but the other comments on your talk page lead me to believe that you are being tendentious in your editing -- you have an axe to grind here. I suggest that you pull back your horns concerning these nationalist topics from this moment forward, or the rest of your time here at Wikipedia may be less pleasant & end unpleasantly. -- llywrch (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But then again, the article isn't about the modern city, Edessa is the historical name. The modern name which may not be Aramean/Syriac if course, is called Şanlıurfa. The TriZ (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it was founded by the Hellenistic Greeks, ruled by the Romans, then later by the Persians & the Byzantines -- all of whom doubtlessly contributed residents. Your point? -- llywrch (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My point was that there won't be anyone from Turkey who will start edit wars over that, since the article is not about the modern city. You might also take in consideration that Edessa is probably most famous of being the capital of the Aramean/Syriac kingdom of Osroene. The TriZ (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly blocked, and even more often warned, about your Syriac people content fork. Last time you were blocked (by me) was on 19 December. On 8 February, you have again created the fork.[3] Understand that you are very close to a permanent ban at this point. The only scenario that will allow you to create a Syriac people article is a clear consensus at Talk:Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people that Syriac people can be a WP:SS sub-article of Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people, with a clear {{main}} link pointing to it. As it happens, there was no link from Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people to Syriac people, establishing beyond doubt that Syriac people was created as a bad faith pov fork.

If you keep ignoring this and recreate the fork yet again, I will ask for a third opinion from admins with previous experience with your case, and subsequently block your account, either permanently, or for a lenghty period of time (several months). --dab (𒁳) 16:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to edit a couple of items on Syriac writers, and noticed that you had edited all of them to add a quite inappropriate "Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people|Syrian" entry to them. In one case you even suggested that Michael the Syrian wrote in Aramaic instead of Syriac! (And yes, I know Syriac is an Aramaic dialect, but the two are different languages).

None of your contributions seem to add relevant information on the article, you see. These comments add nothing; instead they look like promotional spam. Trying to change every article contributed by others in order to boost your racial or political group is normally considered vandalism.

Please stop doing this. Roger Pearse (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to flick in with that this user has been permanently blocked, unfortunately. Even though he had some problems understanding some wikipedia policies, he did actually made some good contributions. This promotional spam you speak of, has developed to some war between Syriacs and Assyrians calling historical figures for Syriac or Assyrian. I'm personally of the opinion that it is correct to call some of them Syriacs, but calling some historical figures like Michael the Syrian for Assyrian (as you can see by the articles history) is just crossing the line (the term Assyrian haven't been used since the fall of the Assyrian empire until the the late of the 19th century). The TriZ (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triz, stop making up stories. Look at this map of ethnic groups in 1600s and tell me what it says: http://www.raremaps.com/maps/large/17920.jpg. And there is plenty more if you care to read. --Chcoc (talk) 04:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Karat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Karat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jack Frost (talk) 04:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habib Mousa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Mousa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]