User talk:Awartha

Welcome!

Hello Awartha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
  
• How to edit a page
  
• Help pages
  
• Tutorial
  
• How to write a great article
  
• What Wikipedia is not
  

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Fang Aili ^talk 23:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Awartha! I noticed that you have edited figure skating-related articles. I have created WikiProject Figure Skating, with the goal of improving Wikipedia's coverage of figure skating articles. We could use your help! Please consider joining. Thanks! -- Fang Aili ^talk 00:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the log for that page, it appears to have been deleted. No idea specifically why...talk to the person who deleted it to discuss it further. DMacks 02:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages can be speedy-deleted with no discussion other than a short-lived notice on the page itself. And once the page is deleted, there's no longer any evidence of that notice. Again, talk to the person who deleted it to see what specific reasoning or policy he was following. DMacks 03:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. They were deleted for being not much more than an introductory sentence or two. That's a speedy for lack of content/context. Please feel free to recreate them since it's clear that you plan on expanding these. Nothing personal. - Lucky 6.9 03:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that you can categorize articles about living people using the tag [[Category:Living people]].--User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 01:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 01:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryo shibata 06 jr worlds sp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Caroline Zhang 06 JGP Taipei.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the comment. I appreciate it and I kind of agree with you. I'll try to change it to a more unique figure skating-related position but meanwhile I'll keep it that way. Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 19:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There. Check if this version pleases you more ;) Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 20:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brian boitano gold.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello--

I added the explanation to the claim that he's first in the world because the statement seems a little POV, and as far as I can tell, the world standings page doesn't have any explanation as to what the scores are based on. Do you think the article would be better without the statement? I feel it still needs to be clarified in some way, because I feel someone unfamiliar to figure skating would assume that Buttle was ranked first based on some single championship event (Worlds and 4CC come to mind), when other people have won those titles.

Thanks for your time! Lmblackjack21 11:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How may I help you? --Sopoforic 03:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) Is there any way to show pages being moved on my watchlist? Right now if a page is moved, I don't notice it until the next edit on it has a different page name than the one it used to have. Awartha 03:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there isn't any way to do that, although I agree that it'd be nice if there were a way. Both of us will just have to be vigilant, I suppose. --Sopoforic 03:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. :( I was wondering why all other edits show up, but not that one. Awartha 05:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Weir,Johnny.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 08:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mikhail Kasalo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dåvid Fuchs (talk / contribs) 02:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamal Othman half-Biellmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, honestly I do not understand what else I shall write as a source for this article. I actually wrote a very long text as a source when I first touched this article. Please see the history and search for my name. The sources are, to say it again: A book with the title "Jahrbuch 1989 - DEV" (Yearbook 1989 - DEV (German Skating Association)) and the result lists of each competition at German figure skating championships as a paper copy. I bought these lists from the DEU, which is the German figure skating association. I freely admit English is not my mother-tongue, but you deleted the text where I explained it, but did not understand what it meant. Why don't you ask me? I am not a monster. Please delete the classification of this article as "Unreferenced". Uwe Langer 19:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I have added the reference section. Please check wether it is sufficiant now. ...and if you like it please delete the classification as "Unreferenced". Uwe Langer 18:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jessica Rose Paetsch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Patricknoddy 22:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jon Nuss, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Patricknoddy 22:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am using NPWatcher, a Wikipedia tool, I don't think those two are very famous outside figure skating, that's my criteria. - Patricknoddy 19:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! I certainly don't want to start a revert war on an article that I don't care about (rather than very periferally). But I would like to note that its current abridged form may be rather misleading. If we simply say that Ming Xu "is a Chinese name where Ming is the family name and Xu is the given name" (which, of course, what "Ming Xu" would mean for the overwhelming majority of persons who are referred to in that way), then I think we should not immediately proceed without explanation to "Xu Ming" (for whom of course Xu is the family name) or General Mingsioi (whose family name we don't know, as the Manchus did not use family name together with the given name. Ming is simply the first syllable of his two-syllable Manchu personal name. I actully was wrong even spelling it with a space, but that would be a likely misspelling for somebody not aware of the convention). Otherwise we'll imply that these persons' family name is Ming, which it is not. If you want the disambig article short - but without factual incorrectness, something like this could do:

---

Ming Xu is usually a Chinese name where Ming is the family name and Xu is the given name.

Ming Xu may also refer to:

• Xu Ming, figure skater
• Mingsioi or Mingxu, a Qing Governor General of the Ili Region.

---

Regards, Vmenkov 09:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Incidentally, it seem that some other articles in Category:Chinese figure skaters may need to be renamed: right now some are named using the Chinese convention - (e.g. Xu Ming, family name first), while others using the "Western" form (e.g. Xiaodong Ma where Ma is the family name). It seems appropriate to rename them all into Last name, First name format, unless there is a good reason to keep somebody's name in a "Western" form. So you may end up creating a few more of those redirect pages - and then somebody else may want to make them into disambig pages... Vmenkov

You recently removed the usage of the "DetailsLink" template on this page, with no edit summay, no talk page discussion, etc. Can you explain why you made that edit? Thanks, Andrwsc 21:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of it to conform to standards used in other skating articles. DetailsLink looked messy and was easily overlooked. I didn't even notice that the page it linked to existed until I following "what links here" from Richard Johansson and found myself in a page I'd never been before. I changed it so it's easier to find more detailed results about the competition. Awartha 21:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but two things: First, please use edit summaries so people can figure out what you are doing. A glance at your contributions list tells me that you rarely use them. Second, that article is more in line with other Olympic articles, and is intended to follow the standard formats used there. A recent discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics had some consensus that merely wikilinking the event name to the event article was less distinctive than adding an identifiable word to show the link. It is still under discussion, so your input would be more helfpul to contribute your opinions than to make unexplained edits. Hope this helps, Andrwsc 21:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lysacek,Evan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Egan617 06:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, actually I would disagree that that establishes notability. A subject (of any type) becomes notable by being featured in multiple nontrivial secondary sources, although we have some good secondary guidelines such as WP:BIO which offer some indications when that's more likely. Also, it would seem to me that the "highest level" for figure skating would be the Olympics, rendering the point moot in this case regardless. It seems he might meet the criteria, but I could find no secondary sources, so I'd like to leave the tag in place for now as all that's featured as a source is a statistics sheet. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 09:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are 319 google hits for him, so I wouldn't call him completely obscure. The highest level for figure skating are the ISU Championships, which are four championships held by the International Skating Union. They are the World Figure Skating Championships, the World Junior Figure Skating Championships, the European Figure Skating Championships, and the Four Continents Figure Skating Championships. To compete at those events, skaters have to be elite and at the highest level in their country. The World Figure Skating Championships are like the Olympics, except they happen every year. World Juniors is the same, except that it's targeted at skaters between the ages of 13 and 19 (but note the ages of competitiors at World Seniors. There's a major overlap, so what happens is that skaters at World Juniors are often skaters who just missed the Worlds team but are still skating at World Championship level). Senior level is Olympic level. Junior level is one below that, but junior level at ISU Championships is based on age, not skill level. Olympic champion Sarah Hughes, for example, could still have gone to World Juniors after winning the gold! Awartha 09:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do see quite a few Google hits for him, unfortunately most of those are not in English. (Or Spanish, I could help on that one too.) What you might want to do (if you can't translate the sources yourself of course!) is contact WP:TRANSLATE for some help translating source material into English. Really though, it's probably not that big a deal right now-the notability tag mentions deletion, but it doesn't call for it, it'll just categorize the article like all the maintenance tags do! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 09:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. Sorry if I come off grumpy. I've watched too many pages I've created get speedy deleted and prodded into extinction, while non notable skaters survive AfD. I think I should tattoo figure skating competition heirarchies onto my forehead. Awartha 10:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to me, sourcing matters more than hierarchy. Still, the article you created does have a notability assertion-A7 is only meant for articles in which there's absolutely no reason stated to believe the subject might be notable, vanity bios and the like, although unfortunately it does get misused sometimes. What you might want to do, though, is set up a userspace "sandbox" that you can use as an incubator for articles in progress until you've got a couple sources on them, that makes them quite a bit less likely to get nominated for deletion. I've got one going like that here, I can certainly help you set it up if you should need. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 10:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What to you need help with? John Reaves (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be that when I clicked on a section to edit it, there was a list of templates transcluded. Now it's only there when I edit the page as a whole. Is there any way to get it back to by-section? Awartha 20:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of, sorry. I'll ask around. Could you give me a specific article as an expample? John Reaves (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Were you using a script? Maybe it's no longer working and you need to update to a newer version? Xiner (talk, email) 21:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, not using a script. And it was every page. For example, World Figure Skating Championships. I'd edit a section and it would show the flagicons at the bottom of the page under Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page:. Now it only shows that when editing the page as a whole. Awartha 21:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I do see a list of transcluded templates under "Templates used in this section:" when I click on the Edit link for a specific section (e.g. the "Men" or "Ladies" sections). Don't see any flag icons, though. —Xhantar^Talk 21:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? where do you see it? All I see is:

Your changes will be visible immediately. For testing, please use the sandbox instead.  On talk pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes (Awartha 21:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)).  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.  Only public domain resources can be copied without permission—this does not include the vast majority of web pages or images.  See our policies and guidelines for more information on editing.  [reply] 

Awartha 21:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Directly below the last line you've copied above, actually ("See our policies..."). Let's just make sure we're both talking about the same page: *click*. I've also uploaded a screenshot here. Just a shot in the dark, but are you perhaps using a skin other than the default Monobook? —Xhantar^Talk 22:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird. I'm using the default skin, and your screencap is what I used to see, but now my page just stops after See our policies and guidelines for more information on editing. . Should I switch skins? Awartha 22:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it sounds like we're both using the same (Monobook) skin, so I don't think it's that. Actually, I've just noticed I'm not seeing the list of templates when using Internet Explorer 6 (don't have 7 to test), but I do when using Firefox. In IE, I only see the same you've pasted above. Maybe it's a feature only possible in Firefox; maybe it's a bug. I'll try and research some more and let you know if I find any more info! —Xhantar^Talk 23:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) I'm using IE and I used to use Firefox. Maybe that's it. Awartha 23:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wait a sec. I have Firefox setup to automatically log me into Wikipedia, but just about never use IE so I was editing the page anonymously when I tested, and didn't notice. Also, I have "Show preview on first edit" turned on under "my preferences" :: "Editing" tab, but the auto preview never happened in IE because I wasn't logged on. I could see the list of templates once I manually clicked on Preview, though, so it looks like you have to preview the page first, before it shows up. This I found out from the following comment in MediaWiki's EditPage.php:

#need to parse the preview early so that we know which templates are used, #otherwise users with "show preview after edit box" will get a blank list

Can you try to preview the page (after editing) and see if the list of templates show up then? —Xhantar^Talk 23:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That works! Thanks! wonder why it needs to be previewed for section but not for the page itself. I suppose it's just one of those things. Awartha 00:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup! Probably some technical reason you wouldn't want to be bored with :) Glad it's working. Feel free to put {{helpme}} back up if you have any other questions. —Xhantar^Talk 01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Doug Leigh.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 17:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above message also applies to the following 31 images:

• Image:Ryo shibata 06 jr worlds sp.jpg
• Image:Caroline Zhang 06 JGP Taipei.jpg
• Image:Jamal Othman 2006 TEB LP.jpg
• Image:Scott Smith 2005 Liberty Open.jpg
• Image:Ryan Bradley 2006 sa LP.jpg
• Image:Sergei Dobrin 2006 TEB LP.jpg
• Image:Jamal Othman half-Biellmann.jpg
• Image:Stephen Carriere 2006 Junior Grand Prix Final Exhibition.jpg
• Image:Alexander Uspenski 06 Jr Worlds.jpg
• Image:Brian boitano gold.jpg
• Image:Hughes,Emily.jpg
• Image:Meissner,Kimberly.jpg
• Image:Belbin,Tanith.jpg
• Image:Agosto,Benjamin.jpg
• Image:Savoie,Matthew.jpg
• Image:Inoue,Rena.jpg
• Image:Baldwin Jr,John.jpg
• Image:Hinzmann,Marcy.jpg
• Image:Parchem,Aaron.jpg
• Image:Gregory,Melissa.jpg
• Image:Petukhov,Denis.jpg
• Image:Silverstein,Jamie.jpg
• Image:O Meara,Ryan.jpg
• Image:Caroline Zhang pearl.jpg
• Image:Viennese Waltz .jpg
• Image:Frank Carroll.jpg
• Image:Eliot Halverson-spiral.JPG
• Image:Eliot Halverson-Biellmann.JPG
• Image:Sergei Voronov.jpg
• Image:Kevin Reynolds - junior worlds.jpg
• Image:Patrick Chan.jpg

Additionally, the following four images may be able to be kept under fair use but they currently fail fair use criterion number 10 for not providing a fair use rationale and may be deleted:

• Image:Virtue & Moir 2006 Campbells OD.jpg
• Image:Walley jump - Lysacek.jpg
• Image:Jamal Othman half Biellmann.jpg
• Image:Vlassov Meekins 06 jr worlds sp.jpg

Please ask if you have any questions. mattbr 18:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are trying to delete a subcategory of Jewish athletes again. This time, figure skaters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_14#Category:Jewish_figure_skaters . I pointed out to the originator of the attempt that we had addressed this general issue already with the main category and with Jewish fencers, where the attempts failed. Still, they insist on trying to delete this category. Any help by your weighing in on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks again. --Epeefleche 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--Epeefleche 20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to warn you that I'm going to be putting Category:Christian figure skaters and Category:Catholic figure skaters on Cfd. This is for consistency as the Jewish one was deletetd. I'm a Catholic Christian myself so mean no offense if you are as well.--T. Anthony 09:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Klimkin-cantilever.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Juliana Cannarozzo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you removed all the biographical information apart from her skating career ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RGCorris (talk • contribs) 23:37, 25 May 2007.

Because it was unsourced and I didn't see anything about it on google. Awartha 05:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source for her birth, marriage and death is the birth, marriage & death records at the Family Records Centre. If you google her father you will find details of her marriage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RGCorris (talk • contribs) 20:21, 26 May 2007

If you have the sources, I don't see what the problem is. Add the info back in and source it. Awartha 21:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving this article. There is no confusion over capitalization, and if there is, there was a link at the top of the article to point people to the right place. When there are only two articles about something, there is no need to create a disambiguation page. Instead, placing a disambig link at the top of both articles will suffice. You are simply making things far too complicated , especially when they don't need to be that complicated. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 17:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the manga back to Short Program, and the figure skating event to Short program. Each page has a disambiguation link at the top in case someone is confused. Please do not continue to make this more complicated than it needs to be. Placing the disambig links at the top is the long-accepted best practice when there are only two possibilities (or even three in many cases). Thanks. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 17:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. There is a huge confusion over capitalization. Searching for "Short program" and for "Short Program" should bring up the exact same article. It's confusing to have the caps-lock on, for example, and get a different article from the one you want. And just speaking for the figure skating article, the short program is officially the "Short Program" in ISU communications, meaning that we'd have two articles with the exact same title. It's easier to disambig them. One article shouldn't have precedence over the other in regards to name. Awartha 19:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this edit. It utilizes the nihongo template to display the name and its transliteration, and also avoids links to the "Japanese" disambiguation page by directing readers to Japanese people later in the sentence. Since I've seen this a few times on your new figure skating pages, and I think you might be adding more, I hope this setup will be useful to you in the future. Dekimasuよ! 23:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to add to what Dekimasu said above, the same point goes for links to articles such as French, American, English, British, Russian, and many other similar terms, all of which can refer either to a nationality or a language or to other concepts. --Russ (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamal Othman half Biellmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 23:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Torvill dean bolero.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Plushenko-protocol.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealander figure skaters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you added Category:Place of birth missing to Audrey Freyja Clarke and maybe elsewhere. Please keep in mind that this category should be place in Talk Pages and not in articles. Read instructions in the Category's page please and links given in User:Yobot to understand why is it. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, for living individuals, instead of Category:Year of birth missing, we use Category:Year of birth missing (living people) (these categories are supposed to be in the article's page!).

And more more thing. In DEFAULTSORT we should not put special characters. Check this edit of mine. Thanks and happy editing, Magioladitis (talk) 14:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lini Simmons may have been a hoax article, but the db-hoax tag is not appropriate except in cases of articles that are self-evidently vandalism. Things that are not self-evidently hoaxes can't be deleted under G3, per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Non-criteria. For other situations, please use Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (and AfD if the tag is removed). You can also take a look at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 31#G3 and hoaxes, is it always "vandalism"?

Template:Db-hoax is a redirect that has itself been deleted twice for this reason. I'm not going to quibble over its existence, but please don't overuse it. Rgds. Dekimasuよ! 04:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jennie Lee (figure skater), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Lee (figure skater). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tassedethe (talk) 16:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

My English is no good. Only I can understand but not speak. I translated with Google translate into my writing. I hope we can understand each other.

Türkçe vikipedi tr:Artistik Buz Pateni'nde Olimpiyat madalyası kazananların kazandığı yaşa göre listesi page, began to build. Here, List of Olympic medalists in figure skating # List of winners by age as I began to write. Is the day of competition in the Olympics is not certain (2006 ice dancing= 20 february, 1984=?) that I used for calculating the last day of the Olympics. I would not want to write it as. Second, these pages as I've done in a different page in Turkish can be divided? I hope you can help.--Erica92 (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba

İngilizcem hiç iyi değildir. Sadece anlayabiliyorum ancak konuşamıyorum. Sana Google translate ile çevrilmiş halini yazarım. Umarım birbirimizi anlayabiliriz.=)

Türkçe vikipedi'de tr:Artistik Buz Pateni'nde Olimpiyat madalyası kazananların kazandığı yaşa göre listesi sayfasını oluşturmaya başladım. Burada List of Olympic medalists in figure skating#List of winners by age şeklinde yazmaya başladım. İlk olarak bazı olimpiyatlarda yarışmaların olduğu gün belli değil onun için hesaplarken olimpiyatın son gününü kullandım. Bunu not olarak yazmak istiyorum. İkincisi ise bu sayfa benim türkçede yaptığım gibi farklı bir sayfa olarak ayrılabilir mi? Umarım yardım edebilirsin. =)

Thanks for uploading File:David Wilson - interview.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ekaterina Zaikina, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Zaikina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 12:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Otar Japaridze, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otar Japaridze. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 12:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Awartha! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Sergei Chetverukhin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Shin Yea-Ji (figure skater born 1988) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Jozef Sabovčík - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Andrei Dobrokhodov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Trent Nelson-Bond - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Plushenko-protocol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo-expanded has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Farix (t | c) 23:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kirsten Olson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phanyaluck Raisuksiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phanyaluck Raisuksiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Courcelles 00:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Push Dick's Button.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luciano Milo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Pottenger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Pottenger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 03:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed that your article was up for deletion for not being notable. You might want to copy it to Wikialpha.org, where there are no notability requirement. Mathewignash (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yuri Bureiko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN as a skater, NN as a coach, therefore NN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Y not? 00:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayako Hagiwara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayako Hagiwara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 23:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuka Ishikawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Ishikawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 23:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitri Antoni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Antoni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Guo Yalu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hergilei (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer LeGuilloux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer LeGuilloux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 04:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Chatziathanassiou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Chatziathanassiou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Federica Constantini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federica Constantini until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 05:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Olympic Ice logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:ISU Judging System.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ISU Judging System.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]