User talk:Bixbyte

Welcome!

Hello, Bixbyte, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Novelos Therapeutics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   01:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Novelos Therapeutics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   01:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, interesting compound you company has produced, but I can't find any papers on it having antiviral activity. Can we discuss this at Talk:Antiviral_drug? Thanks Tim Vickers (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've rewritten this edit since reduced glutathione is known as GSH, while one of the oxidation states of glutathione is glutathione disulphide (GSSG). However, I tend to avoid saying "oxidised glutathione" since that doesn't tell you if you're talking about the disulphide, or some other form such as sulfinic or sulfonic acids. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, but as I did my PhD on thiol metabolism, I'm quite familiar with the difference between GSH and GSSG. Looking at that cancer research paper link, I'm very surprised by your data in figure 6, which seem to indicate that GSH is a substrate of glutathione reductase. I don't see how that is possible, since GSH is the product of this enzyme, not a substrate. The paper doesn't give any method for how you did these assays, so I can't work out what might be causing this very odd result. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. I am having trouble understanding how it is that you are not affiliated with this company when I see these results. Any comment?  7  00:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - I have started a discussion about this issue here. Your comments are welcome.  7  00:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to NOV-002 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.glutoxim.ru/eng/index.php?id=9&issueId=7 Whpq (talk) 02:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you wrote

Your addition to NOV-002 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.glutoxim.ru/eng/index.php?id=9&issueId=7 Whpq (talk)

_____________________________________

Hi Whpq, this material came right from my source Novelos Therapeutics.
Actually the site www.glutoxim.ru is a sister site and they borrowed this info directly from Novelos since they speak Russian and needed an english translation.
As you stated, it "appears" and that is all appears.
Now, kindly correct your removal.

If you require further evidence I could have Dr Pazoles or Harry Palmin the CEO of Novelos Therapeutics verify this statement? Harry Palmin helped me with this literature.

Thank You,
Alex Kalman
Bixbyte (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Bixbyte[reply]

_________________________

If this material is being donated to Wikipdia, then you need to follow WP:DCP. -- Whpq (talk) 03:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And to answer the question you had on today's entry of Wikipedia:Copyright problems, see Wikipedia:Contact us. MLauba (talk) 15:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|I will not whore the "cure" for certain types of cancer on wiki anymore}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 17:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bixbyte. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have nominated Novelos Therapeutics, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novelos Therapeutics. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ukexpat (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Bixbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

4.238.245.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Spam / advertising-only account: shilling for Novelos all over the internet

• Blocking administrator: Orangemike (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 22:57, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bixbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

NOV-002 cures certain types of Cancer, this medication is currently under review by the FDA Phase III trials under Special Protocol and Fast Track.[1] The drug trial results will be published in a couple months. I am not spamming this all over the Internet. Now, one lady with Breast Cancer has been proven cured of her cancer with NOV-002. I am posting responsible information to help people that have cancer and are searching for treatment options. If someone in your family has cancer do you want them to know there are new treatments available? NOV-002 taken along with standard Platinum Chemotherapy has been proven in one Phase II FDA Drug study to increase the ability of patients to tolerate Chemo by 63%. Normally 50% of people that have cancer and receive Platinum Chemotherapy die right away. With NOV-002 63% of these people will LIVE! And that is a fact.

Decline reason:

You're confused about Wikipedia's mission. We're not a publicity platform, a marketing platform, an advertising platform, or any sort of advocacy platform. You'll need to find another place to carry out your mission. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bixbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OrangeMike a Delegate of the DNC (Democrat National Convention) for determination of the President of the United States of America Blocked Bixbyte because he posted a Medication called NOV-002 on the Wikipedia that appears to cure certain types of cancer. Fox News Washington DC affiliate is talking to me about running the Miami Channel 7 Fox News TV story about the Mrs Lilian Mills breast cancer cured with NOV-002 going National. If you unblock me, I will not mention how the Wikipedia and OrangeMike blocked me and the NOV-002 story. So Please consider very carefully why you should Unblock Bixbyte. Thank You

Decline reason:

For those who see politics in everything, the only recourse is to hurl mud. I am revoking your talk page privileges for this particularly egregious outing attempt. Mutes -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 19:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.