User talk:CNMall41

For Bigg Boss 18

[edit]

i just want to ask you a question can I get any punishment for my editing or creating Bigg Boss 18 article 2000editor (talk) 11:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continued editing after you asked this question, it does not appear you want an actual reply. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revive the Bigg Boss 18 article

[edit]

please do something to again back this show if you want discussion so tell me where I have to discuss with you 2000editor (talk) 05:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. You have wasted enough of my time and the community's time. Do not come back to my talk page as I do not wish to discuss anything with you here. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , I really admire your work and believe you’d make an excellent admin - we needs more dedicated people like you. Would you be open to me nominating you?Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. I have been asked before but not sure I really want to go through the process of getting there. Maybe in the future. Right now there is enough stress doing something I am supposed to enjoy. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverted edits of Sohai Ali Abro

[edit]

You reverted all the edits that I made in Sohai Ali Abro. Although, the sources not 100% support the context however one could assume the some facts like a source published in 2013 about a TV series' success would talk about the TV series of that year. So, such things are obviously understandable. And, I have reverted the edit of analysis on her performance by a newspaper as it was as it is taken from the source. Thanks. We fjjxsiwi (talk) 06:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do not add content based on assumptions. We add them based on the source. Doing otherwise is WP:OR or using WP:FAKEREF to put what we want. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[edit]

Hello CNMall41, hope you are having a good day. I knew that this AfD was not our first encounter, but I wasn't sure where I've seen you before. Well, this AfD was our first encounter and you were also behaving the same way you are doing now. I get it, no one likes to lose, but trying to paint people as villains by saying they should be WP:CIVIL or stop WP:BATTLEGROUND is just wrong. You were also outmatched on that previous AfD, and you are still outmatched even now, but instead of pointing out what's wrong with article, you keep saying I should be CIVIL and refrain from muddying the discussion when I'm clearly presenting sources. Respectfully, stop this behavior and be "CIVIL." dxneo (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disheartening that you feel the need to come here. Seems like a double down and meets the spirit of WP:GRAVEDANCING. Don't do it again. Take my conduct to WP:ANI should you feel I am "behaving" in a certain manner but please make sure to be aware of WP:CLEANHANDS. While we are at it, you misquoted me twice now at an AfD, despite being asked not to after the first time. I would suggest you redact. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puffery in Sanam Saeed

[edit]

There is a lot of puffery a d original research involved in the section of "Acting career" of Sanam Saeed. Please, help me to fix so that I could add the correct details later. We fjjxsiwi (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could You Please Take a Second Look at The Victor Ghoshe page?

[edit]

Hello, you recently put up some templates on the Victor Ghoshe article. I made the changes accordingly. Could you please- whenever you get time - verify the new tonality? Also, please see if the new citations are redundant. Thank you ParallelDimension (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any editor is free to remove the tags at any time if they feel the issues do not exits or that the issues have been taken care of. I did take a quick look and I don't feel they have. It is not about the redundancy, it is about the reliability of the sources.--CNMall41 (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NextEra Energy overview section?

[edit]

Hi CNMall41, I was looking around at some other company articles and saw that quite a few of them have some version of a "Company overview" section with operational details, leadership, revenue, etc. It's similar information to what is in the infobox. Do you think something like that would be appropriate for the NextEra Energy article? If so, would you be willing to review a section like that if I put it together? Really appreciate your help with those last two things. Cheers NextEraMatt (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be careful about proposing anything based on WP:OSE. However, I will review anything you propose. I am unsure exactly what you had in mind so would suggest just writing it up and then others can opine and hopefully it will meet guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I'll do that. Thanks! 2601:58B:E7F:4650:21B5:2F90:640B:7154 (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's what I get when I don't login first. Thank you. Will follow up! NextEraMatt (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]