User talk:Cbdorsett

User talk:Cbdorsett/archive/2007

User talk:Cbdorsett/archive/2008

User talk:Cbdorsett/archive/2009

--Zmalach (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cbdorsett. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English.
Message added 08:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kudpung (talk) 08:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article M. Christian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, unsource BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, M. Christian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Christian. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer Waters 14:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions, but see WP:NOTBROKEN. Chreers, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Callahan's Lady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 20:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cbdorsett. I usually add any films screened at one of the major film festivals (Cannes, Berlin, Venice, etc) to the relevant film list article. All these films are notable by the very fact they were In Competition for the major award. Great work on expanding the lists so far! Lugnuts (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Babbitt is indeed an MMC. Although modern MMCs are a ceramic fibre or a metal carbide, a material such as Babbitt with hard metal crystals (in a soft matrix) is still an MMC. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cbdorsett. You have new messages at Talk:El Nora Alila.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— SpikeToronto 05:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have undone your additions to {{ISO 639-3 header}} because my bot is currently replacing these templates with the more flexible {{ISO 639-3 style}}. Hope you don't mind. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Anypodetos's talk page.

Hi! I saw that you created {{ISO639ANC}} and {{ISO639HIS}}. Since my bot is currently replacing {{ISO639COL}} and related templates with {{ISO 639-3 style}}, I assume the creation of the former was a misunderstanding between us. An individual ancient language can be colour coded with {{ISO 639-3 style|I|A}}. If you are not satisfied with the colours this produces, you can just edit the style template or ask me to do so if you are unsure with the coding. Do you mind if I nominate your templates for deletion, or have you a special use for them in mind? Cheers, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit to ESaaS. I have added a reference but it looks as though the term has been coined by a single company, although it might become more widely used in the future. Biscuittin (talk) 09:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a strong scientific consensus that birds are dinosaurs, as has been debated as nauseum on the various relevant talk pages. The few "scientists" who oppose this view usually resort to creationist-like methods of debate, and have in the case of Alan Feduccia fought a sorry retreat over the last two decades ("birds are not theropods because the theropods have no feathers" became "many theropods are birds, and not dinosaurs, because they are feathered" LOL). If you have any evidence that birds indeed are not dinosaurs, please post on the talk page. HMallison (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Writing Systems is conducting a poll regarding its future goals, and we have identified you as a person with a vested interest in the future of that project. Whether you are a member of the WikiProject, a frequent contributor, or a passerby with an interest in the subject, we want your input as to the future emphasis that the Writing Systems project will take. Please take a moment to peruse the entries and add your comments where you have an opinion. You can visit the poll by clicking here, or on the project image, 書, on the right.

Template:Etyl has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 06:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is now deprecated, per the {{persondata}}, hence why it's being removed. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mike1901. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to La Rambla, Barcelona has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mike1901 (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cbdorsett. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cbdorsett. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I'm going to undo this edit. That article has a number of short citations (author and page only) that refer to the full citations in the Works Cited section; there's no need to include the full citation inline. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cbdorsett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]