User talk:CrowzRSA

This user left Wikipedia. CrowzRSA has not edited Wikipedia since March 12, 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is CrowzRSA's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CrowzRSA. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gravity bong, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Deletion of this page may be controversial or is under discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of. That page has been dreadful and poorly formatted/referenced for years, so I'm just working through the sections and getting them up to modern guidelines. If I can summon up the motivation, it would be nice to make it a featured list, but it's more of a long term project. Of course, you're quite welcome to help and carry out any edits you think will get the page closer to that level. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Temptations (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the music video for Tupac Shakur's song "Temptations" does not feature Shakur because he was incarcerated at the time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Temptations (song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

	The Ultimate Metal Award
	For your immense contribution to the WikiProject Slayer and for being inspiration to the unofficial Megadeth project, an enthusiastic effort to improve the coverage on this band on Wikipedia. I've read every article on Slayer's albums and they are simply amazing, enjoyed them a lot. Thanks for writing such superb articles! Вик Ретлхед (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hit 'Em Up you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your feedback. Thanks, C679 13:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hit 'Em Up you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hit 'Em Up for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where I've only written "prose" it needs to be re-worded, per criteria 1a of the Good Article criteria. C679 08:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added comments to complete my review, hope you can find time to address the concerns. Thanks, C679 13:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hit 'Em Up you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hit 'Em Up for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Temptations (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 03:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leave Home you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Temptations (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Temptations (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leave Home you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leave Home for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be all right with you if I nominated Leave Home for DYK? — Maile (talk) 20:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only if I'm co-nominator :)) CrowzRSA 22:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you done DYK? I was going to list you as the article creator, which I believe is the credit you actually want. The template automatically lists the nominator as the person who actually filled out the form. And all it means is that I filled out the form. You get the big credit. Below is from the nomination template. I list your name as author. The nominator name is automatic from who filled it out Please let me know:— Maile (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

| author          = CrowzRSA |    author2      = 

Look, here's one I filled out for another GA, so you know what it looks like. I had nothing to do with improving the article, just nominating it.— Maile (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nominations/Caelum

Here it is, and you did a really excellent job on developing the article to GA quality.— Maile (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rocket to Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Freeman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rocket to Russia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Natt the Hatt. I received your message regarding work on the Ramones articles. I'm happy to help in anyway I can. I looked over your progress, and I think the stuff you've done looks great. Mostly I tend to stick to clean up, but if the mood hits I'll take on something larger. All I ask is for lines of communication to remain open so we can discuss the best way to improve the articles. I look forward to working on this project. Natt the Hatt (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah man anything you can do to assist, whether its a copyedit of Ramones (album) or getting Joey Ramone to good article status, constructive edits always help. CrowzRSA 00:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rocket to Russia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rocket to Russia for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 02:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Road to Ruin (Ramones album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 11:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Road to Ruin (Ramones album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Road to Ruin (Ramones album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Road to Ruin (Ramones album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Gillespie and Twang

End of the Century (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mojo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey pal, I can see you're busy with the Ramones' albums, but if you have some spare time, can you take a look at Megadeth's article? You've been working on Slayer, so I think you can handle the review just fine. Thanks in advance.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 21:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure man I love me some Megadeth. It'll probably take me a while to go through it all since its pretty long. CrowzRSA 17:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo, take all the time you need. Cheers.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About The System Has Failed notes:

1) "Rust in Peace lineup" is not a quote, just a reference to the band's most famous lineup. Should I re-write it or leave it the way it is?

• Since it is not a quote, remove the quotation marks CrowzRSA 23:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2) If I understood you right, I should have delinked Sanctuary Records and Chris Poland, which I already did. Cheers.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, just make sure things are only linked (at most) twice throughout the article: once in the lead and again in its first appearance in context. CrowzRSA 23:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3) About the album, it was simply named Gigantour. Should I mention it or leave the sentence as it is?--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• You might want to include the name if you're planning on nominating it for FA, but for GA it should be fine the way it is. CrowzRSA 18:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article End of the Century you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 22:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leave Home, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Gimme Gimme Shock Treatment" from the Ramones's Leave Home album was described as a "sing-along mental-illness ode"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leave Home. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it may be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

The article End of the Century you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:End of the Century for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Pleasant Dreams page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Road to Ruin (Ramones album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linda Stein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pleasant Dreams you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pleasant Dreams you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pleasant Dreams for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a review of you nomination of Mack 10 discography. May I ask that you make a review of Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Golden Martín Fierro Award winners/archive2 in return? Cambalachero (talk) 22:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Korn project.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subterranean Jungle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude, I don't mean to rush you, but you should be closing the GA nomination on Megadeth. It's been opened for almost a month, and if there are no further issues, I think you can provide a verdict whether the article will be promoted or not. Thanks for the review by the way, you did a hell of a job on the article.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy, one last favour if you will. Can you reduce the audio quality of File:Symphony of Destruction clip.ogg and trim it down to 28 seconds, so I can incorporate it into the band's page? Thanks a bunch.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course man, i'll try to do that asap. CrowzRSA 00:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ramones discography page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gravity bong you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gravity bong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You will be happy to know that Gravity bong passed the GAR! I left all the comments on its review page and have to say well done on addressing all of those problems so quickly. The whole article now complies per the GA criteria. My writing skills have improved since I left school too! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 17:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gravity bong you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gravity bong for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend. I opened a peer review as you suggested. An editor said it would be better if the audios used there have lower quality (64kbps to be precise). The rest of the notes (images and fair-use rationales) are my obligations and I will do them as soon as I can. So sorry for bothering you with this issue again! All the best.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'll try to do it soon. Just been busy lately. CrowzRSA 04:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a fellow Ramones fan, I was often disappointed at the quality of their album articles. Thank you for fixing this. Your additions (while needing a slight bit of polishing here and there) are very informative and detailed. Keep up the good work! Twyfan714 (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove Category:Gangsta rap albums from Eazy-Duz-It because it is not gangsta rap. In my edit summary, I said see Category:Eazy-E albums. If you look there, you'll see that a parent category for that is Category:Gangsta rap albums, which means every album in Category:Eazy-E albums is automatically categorized as a gangsta rap album. That's how categorization works. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Center Cap.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nine fortythree logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article Marquee Moon, an article about a rock music album? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 22:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course man, I'd be happy to. It'll have to wait 'til the end of the week though so I can finish up finals. CrowzRSA 00:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Too Tough to Die you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 03:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Too Tough to Die you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Too Tough to Die for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Too Tough to Die you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Too Tough to Die for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 02:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Subterranean Jungle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Subterranean Jungle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Subterranean Jungle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 20:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Rice Irwin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Rice Irwin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Rice Irwin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Rice Irwin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John Rice Irwin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy, how's work going? I see you haven't been very active lately, but wanted to ask if you are able to do a review on Rust in Peace? It's been nominated for GAR four months ago, but no one has shown desire to open the review. Me and L1A1 FAL would be very grateful if you can take the task. Thanks for everything.--Retrohead (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah been taking summer classes at college so i haven't been on here much. if it still hasn't been reviewed by the 9th lemme know. CrowzRSA 04:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crowz. I'm the nominator for Rust, I understand that you're busy, but if you could find a few extra minutes I would really appreciate if you could give an opinion or some advice on Hidden Treasures (EP). Retrohead and I have been sporadically working on that one hoping to get it up to GA status, but I'm not sure it's near that standard yet. I've seen that you got some of the smaller Slayer pages (Eternal Pyre, Live Undead, Haunting the Chapel) to GA status, so your input on the matter would be valuable. Thanks again.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

check Talk:Hidden Treasures (EP). CrowzRSA 20:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll work on some of that then. Thanks for the suggestions. Take care--L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Great work on getting Megadeth to FA status. This is the first heavy metal-related article to be promoted in five years. This accomplishment wouldn't have been possible without your assistance. Retrohead (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rust in Peace may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• where otherwise cited, all listed accolades attributed to ''Rust in Peace'' are adapted from [[Acclaimed Music].<ref name="Acclaimed Music">{{cite web|title=Megadeth: Rust in Peace|url=http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for reviewing Rust in Peace. Take care!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With the fifth album just weeks away and loads of information is being released concerning the album, singles, tours etc. I would like as many people as possible to join in to help get some more of Slipknot's articles in the Good Article section and even help push the main page as a featured article. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list. If you do not add your name to the list by September 25, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! If you are interested in continuing helping sign your name here Kevon100 ^Talk! _Mail 20:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Crowz, do you know how to activate the citation bot? I need it to go through And Justice for All. Thanks a bunch.--Retrohead (talk) 10:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. For the record, just went to this URL: https://tools.wmflabs.org/citations/doibot.php?edit=toolbar&slow=1&page=...And_Justice_for_All_(album)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Got the Life 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Crowz, are you still active on Wiki? If so, can you check my FA nomination on Master of Puppets? I'm struggling to fine reviewers, so your input is more than welcomed.--Retrohead (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Cannabis! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 559 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in the subject of cannabis.

• Browse the new WikiProject page
• Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Snappy Tomato Pizza logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikpedia Page.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Worthington College. Since you had some involvement with the Worthington College redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was in contact with PJ Sparks 8 years ago regarding the Eleanor Roosevelt Short Snorter (SS). I see the SS.org web page is down now. I have a copy of information in a Feb 1943 Margaret Bourke-White Life Magazine article specific to her use of a SS. Do you have updated contact information for PJ Sparks? 2601:5CC:C800:88BF:1592:47DC:5E41:8531 (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC) David Michel, USDragoons@aol.com.[reply]

Hi,

I think I've done everything you told me to with the article. Could you take a look and see if there's anything else I should do? Thanks! -Anotheronewiki (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Left Behind Alternate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Animal Boy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halfway to Sanity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Animal Boy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Animal Boy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Halfway to Sanity you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Halfway to Sanity for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:CrowzRSA.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:CrowzRSA2.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:CrowzRSA3.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Crowz RSA.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Up to Our Necks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up to Our Necks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemonpasta (talk) 22:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Korn - Digital EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Logo wcmasthead en.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 13:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Korn Project2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slayer - Christ Illusion (Deluxe Edition.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lust of The Beatles Songs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17#Lust of The Beatles Songs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CurrentWPKornAoF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Korn - Predictable (demo).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ramones - Hey Ho Let's Go Greatest Hits cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Ramones(album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 2 § Ramones(album) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]