User talk:Damian Yerrick

Hi, this is Sunil, a new wikipedia user. I came to knew that you have an interest in Computer and related topics. Recently i am Using Ubuntu Os and want to download audio and video codecs so if you know any codec website for Ubuntu kindly inform me the web link.
You may also drop your valuable suggestions on my talk page. Sunil.Kumar.G.U. (talk • contribs)Sunil.Kumar.G.U. 07:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.12.202 (talk) [reply]

• 2001–2004
• 2005–2007
• Non-free JPEG to PNG conversion issues

Hi, Damian! My reason for removing those images wasn't because of their size, but because it was a non-free gallery, which is strongly frowned upon. I won't be taking any further action though. :-) east.718 at 05:47, February 27, 2008

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoop logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Motherfucker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Wsvlqc (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what your intent was with this edit to the {{Future video game}} template. It apparently broke the template and put it up for speedy deletion; I undid your edit. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was that {{future video game}} and {{future game}} were recursively transcluding each other. At the time I made the edit (2008-04-04T20:45:15), the template {{future game}} had just been moved to {{future video game ambox}}, and my edit appeared to fix things. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 17:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The salt page was on my watchlist, but I don't regularly look over recent changes to the pages on the list. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 00:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Also cocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 15:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see answer to your question at Talk:Evolution of sex Big Question (?): HermaphroditesSashag (talk) 16:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So specialization into food-gathering and reproduction was more energy-efficient than having both genders carry around organs for both. I understand now. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:49, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary on Dyslexia could be viewed as quite offensive, especially as vandals repeatedly introduce errors such as the one corrected. Please keep this in mind. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 16:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for posting the apology. I know it may seem petty but it goes to the credibility of wikipedia in a minor way. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 08:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to User talk:Cagado --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 04:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wikitruth, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (6th nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos (talk) 00:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL at the speedy keep. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:2girls1cup.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A page that you have been involved in editing, Fuck face, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brougham96 (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And five minutes later, PhilKnight (talk · contribs) declined the speedy deletion until the RFD finishes. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFD was closed as keep. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 02:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To keep this in one place, I've taken the discussion to User talk:Antodav2007. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have another question: how do I get self-identifying tags like the ones that you have on the right side of your user page? There are several of those that I'd like to add. --Antodav2007 (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Userboxes. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 04:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Emulator fur has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I must say I'm not really happy with your example wording of "To illustrate the appearance of this game under emulation in the context of critical commentary on the game or emulator." You see, this is still not a concrete statement about an individual image in an individual article. It's again something that people will just be copying in as boilerplate. Exactly what issue is the topic of critical commentary? We need an example of what it means to say something concrete about a particular case. Something that is so special no reader will even be tempted to just copy it over. Because that's just the point, you see? Do we have a case where this template has been used and somebody has really given a concrete description? Something on the level of concreteness of (silly invented example): "To demonstrate the special visual effect of the fireworks that are shown when a player has won, an effect that this game became famous for and which served as a model for many later ones." I'm sure you can think of a more concrete and less silly example... Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That Other Template ({{logo fur}}) has a choice of six boilerplate purposes in the Use argument. Do we have a case where {{logo fur}} has been used and somebody has really given a concrete description? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, OtherFURsExist is not really the best thing to argue here. I mean, what do these game screenshot images do? Is it really so difficult to pick one of them and describe in a few words what it does, I mean, real simple words and without all that "critical commentary" stuff? Or, asked differently, if some evil deletionist picked one of them and proposed it for deletion as failing NFCC8 ("doesn't make any substantial contribution to understanding the article"), what would you answer them in an IfD discussion? That answer should already be anticipated in the rationale. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the time, an emulator-sourced screenshot is used to identify a video game or video game element in an article about said video game or video game element. For example, see the screenshots in the article Super Mario Bros. I just created {{emulator fur}} to provide reasonable defaults for emulator-sourced images. The whole "critical commentary" bit is in the other rationale templates such as {{logo fur}}; if you find it inappropriate, fork {{logo fur}} in your user space. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Gay Luigi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Do not want. Since you had some involvement with the Do not want redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mjf3719 (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making 2008 an interesting and enlightening year for me; at some point, our paths have crossed and I've found your comments amusing, helpful or thought-provoking—I'll let you guess which!

Wishing you and yours a joyous holiday season, and happiness, health and hopefulness in 2009. I trust you'll enjoy this little token, a favourite performance of Baby, it's Cold Outside, for your holiday amusement.
Best, Risker (talk) 03:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Noddy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GJC 03:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acento sobre la "appear". I've started a BRD for this: Talk:Noddy#Mr. Wobbly Man revert --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 05:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good job on the roly-poly article!! I think that's an ideal solution...GJC 23:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Do not want, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not encyclopedic

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. man with one red shoe 17:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed someone reverted this. 1. Redirects can't be prodded (only articles), and 2. pages that have already been discussed for deletion can't be prodded either. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 17:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever considered standing for WP:RFA? I am interested in nomming you. MBisanz ^talk 06:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested, seeing as how I've been confused with an admin before on WP:EDITS. But what would I do with the mop? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 14:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I daresay it's been five years too late for you to have an easy chance. :) bibliomaniac15 03:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you have been here long enough to dig yourself deep into Wikipedia. Still, it's never too late to say this:

-BlueCaper (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize that I am violating WP:NOTFORUM, but I don't know any other (reasonable) way to contact you; the contact form on your website doesn't seem to be working, and I am not sure whether "tepples at spamcop dot net" is still your preferred email address. Please feel free to archive or remove this message once you have dealt with the issue appropriately.

Anyway, the symptom is that when I press Send, the form simply goes blank instead of displaying a confirmation message. Further discussion is at uncyclopedia:User talk:Tepples#Problem with contact form on your website.

By the way, thank you for all your great work on Wikipedia, especially reverting vandalism. 131.215.159.229 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not paying more attention here. Anyway, it seems that I need to clarify my question: Should I email you at the address I mentioned above, email you at some other address, or just try the contact form again? (Or register a Wikipedia account and use Special:Emailuser? By "reasonable" above, I meant that the issue doesn't deserve snail mail.) 131.215.159.229 (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tepples[at]spamcop[dot]net should work, but I don't check it very often. And thanks for pointing out the problem on /contact/; I forgot to upgrade it from PHP 4 to PHP 5 when I upgraded the rest of my site. But it'd still be wise to register here if you plan to contribute to Wikipedia. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Emulator fur has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 19:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Compaq Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MSG Network logo 2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was board I won't be doing that anymore. Also nice website --Isthisthelongestusernameeverihopeso (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Weather Channel logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damian Yerrick. You have new messages at Talk:3M computer.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Cybercobra (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FPLP Eddie.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The same applies to File:FPLP Maggie.png, File:FPLP Michael.png, File:FPLP Sarah Lynn.png, and File:FPLP Sonya Lee.png. —teb728 t c 00:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here, you've said that the article abuts wp:own. But your edit to the article contradicts the application of the rule (essay).

In wp:own, all wikipedia content (this includes templates, categories, and others, not just articles) ruled. But the only edit you've made to wp:don't revert limits it's application to only articles. So, it can't really abut wp:own, unless wp:own is changed.

Also, please read the section on the talk page I started. I say wp:brd applies, so those changes (except for you addition of the internal link (wp:brd) are not needed. (I support your inclusion of the internal link, btw.)

Could you please comment.174.3.111.148 (talk) 20:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point. I reverted myself in part. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 21:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pingas was deleted several times because it was created as a redirect to Dr. Eggman (aka Ivo Robotnik), because of a silly Internet meme where Robotnik says "Snooping as usual, I see" on an episode of Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog. That's why it was salted, and even if it were re-created and locked, I think there would be a great deal of vandalism on the talk page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog and YouTube Poop. (In fact, the video in which this word-trim debuted actually used "he's g[etting aw]ay" as the main gag, and "[snoo]ping as" was a side gag.) But I am also aware of the pornographic film Las Chupa Pingas, whose title uses "pingas" in the sense of the plural of the Spanish slang term. Perhaps a protected soft redirect to wikt:pinga might be warranted instead. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 16:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but it would have to be locked of course, and would probably need a lock on the talkpage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting the talk page to Talk:Pinga (disambiguation) and protecting that would be fine by me. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 18:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damian Yerrick. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Sound recordings.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jafeluv (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hana Zagorová discography. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Zagorová discography. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Motherfucker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It ended up declined. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 14:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tetris-o.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chicane. Calvin was not the best match, so removing that reference was probably a good idea anyway. ⇔ ChristTrekker 17:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Chicane found here looks nothing like Chicago. So how do we disambiguate these? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflation of "third tier" fonts based on name is a real problem. No one's going to come out with something called "Times New Roman" that looks like anything other than Times New Roman. But something like Chicane that few have ever heard of? Another designer likes the name and makes his own, totally different, face. I don't know if there is a good solution. You could link to the one you're referring to, but that's likely a temporary measure at best, because those free font sites come and go, and often the designer doesn't host them himself. If the designer is known (e.g. Bitstream) you could use that for disambiguation, but for obscure fonts like this it can be hard to track down. I'd love to see a good (i.e. long-term stable) typography wiki that could document this sort of thing. ⇔ ChristTrekker 14:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article following a request on the talk page. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Toki Pona/GA2. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Puyo-whatisagroup.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 17:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jc iindyysgvxc (my contributions) 00:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Damian Yerrick. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that RfA, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete it for you in about a week or so from today. Regards, FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have unintentionally added "ditch mitch" to the "Suggested solutions" section here (reverted here). Was this perhaps a mistake in copying and pasting? 131.215.159.169 (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was trying to type this political epithet into my web browser's search bar to gauge opinion on the Internets against Mitch Daniels or Mitch McConnell, but the confusing focus-stealing JavaScript in Wikipedia's new Vector skin screwed me up. My bad. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A while back, you contributed an audio file to the missing fundamental article. There are concerns about what it's demonstrating and whether it's effective, so I moved it out of the main article and onto the discussion page, at least until we can get something put together that's easy to understand and effective for all listeners. It might be a matter of rewriting the explanation, or maybe "the illusion of rich bass" just isn't something that can be demonstrated consistently enough to be worthwhile. —mjb (talk) 23:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz ^talk 02:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Traumatic incident reduction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yoenit (talk) 18:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this was not intended for you, but for the person who remade the page Yoenit (talk) 18:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amanita muscaria (green).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kufat (talk) 14:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lois-cinderella.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NES Tetris Box Front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 18:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it listed there. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NES Tetris Box Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything in edit summary or talk about actually removing the image from the article's infobox. It turned out that one IP user had vandalized the infobox, and another made a good-faith yet incorrect attempt to fix it. I fixed it better. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 16:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantic Records fan logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logo appears superseded. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Western Union money transfer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 06:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Miscarriage. Since you had some involvement with the David Miscarriage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Karppinen (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on David Miscarriage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 18:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Puyo-combos.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 00:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Talk:Pat_Tillman#Hew_to_the_source and chime in on the discussion as to how the "Offensive material" guidelines apply. The disagreement is whether the word fucking is germane to the section in question or whether it is gratuitous and therefore in opposition to this guideline. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:12Move logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new section to the discussion for this article.

Talk:LZ77_and_LZ78#This_article_needs_some_corrections

Rcgldr (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am kindly enough to give you a free sample of our delicious brownies :D how about it? Chamalani (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Damian Yerrick! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The article Hana Zagorová discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Artist (if notable at all) does not warrant such a list of works containing her songs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hana Zagorová discography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Zagorová discography (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pseudoword , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Allens (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shooter on Яails. Since you had some involvement with the Shooter on Яails redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Axem Titanium (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this per WP:CSD#G7, but there are a dozen articles that linked to it which now have resulting redlinks. Is there a more appropriate place for those links to point to? JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd point them at Rail shooter. (Do we have a bot to do this?) --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 21:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Whoops. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Whoops redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just a friendly reminder that links such as the one you added here can (should?) be made protocol-relative: //toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/rdcheck.py?page=Template:Edit_protected. SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A link in this section of your user page was broken when the uncyclopedia: interwiki prefix was removed. It should be fixed if you change the target to wikia:uncyclopedia:User:Tepples. SoledadKabocha (talk) 22:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding bug 5984 et al., see User:Js/ajaxPreview and User:Anomie/ajaxpreview.js for some user scripts that allow previewing of references. Note that the latter does a lot of tricky "manual" parsing of wikitext, and I haven't tested it, so I can't vouch for its reliability for this particular task. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 20:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Damian Yerrick,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, MBisanz ^talk 20:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Posted a response to your comment from last year here. Be interested to hear your thoughts! JEB215 (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to remind you that {{r from Unicode}} exists. Also, I'm a little bit in doubt on the usefulness of the specific redirect 🍂. How likely of a search term do you think it is? Is there some policy or guideline I should study further? (Yes, I did look over WP:Redirect.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that template; thank you. Anyway, I found U+1F342 🍂 as a red link in {{Unicode chart Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs}}. The name of the code point is "FALLEN LEAF". I created this redirect on the pattern that U+2603 ☃ goes to snowman, U+1F337 🌷 goes to tulip, U+1F4A3 💣 goes to bomb, and when you type the logo of MediaWiki ([[🌻]]) using U+1F33B 🌻, you get a link to sunflower. Is there a better article about fallen leaves than Abscission, or perhaps Deciduous#Botany? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of yet. Admittedly, I'm aware that a lot of {{r from Unicode}} redirects end up going to RFD ... where most are kept (and that's the point that I failed to make clear). --SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ObL. Since you had some involvement with the ObL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jawadreventon (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damian Yerrick. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads-up that your edit was reverted. (The reversion was factually justified in that the only previous target of WP:WCW was WP:Wikipedia can wait.)

I would have liked to turn this into a more general discussion about disambiguation/hatnote standards and how verifiability ties in, but I don't have enough material in mind yet. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Damian, I found your user and talk pages while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of their earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 09:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Damaged good, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the approved way to say "I intend to provide citations before the day's over"? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Damaged good is not a list of products that some Wikipedia editor thinks should use a different pricing strategy. If you have an independent source, who is in a position to know, who says that the product meets the defintion of a "damaged good", then cite it. Because a company decides to charge more for electronics with more features is not enough. They might want to avoid the considerable expense of customer support for development platforms. Selling the development version to consumers at a low price and telling them development capability is unsupported leads to angry customers and damaged reputation. There are any number of other reasons for such pricing strategies.

You don't get to decide what is a damaged good. Sources tell us that. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One could make the same argument about the other examples used in the article, especially the Casio, so long as the cited sources happen not to use the phrase "damaged good". --Damian Yerrick (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Damaged good. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i wanted to know if you can unlock the pokemon wikipedia page that you created so i can edit some things in the Generations section. if it is okay with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokemon Master Mason (talk • contribs) 04:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember having created any Pokémon pages, and I am not an administrator. You could try posting your changes for discussion on the article's talk page and then using the {{sudo}} template once discussion has reached a consensus. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some experienced Wikipedians have lost interest in WP:Categorizing redirects, but not all — I see no consensus not to do it either. It's probably worth reading up on the redirect templates before you try this. Example --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, my point was that you should attempt to categorize any main-namespace redirects you create, despite the lack of a perfect consensus on the recommendation level of WP:Categorizing redirects. If the creator of a redirect doesn't categorize it, someone else (like me) eventually will, and it's best to save them the effort.

When I saw this, it took me a while to realize that you meant #Contested deletion 23. In such cases, I'd normally change the section-title part of the edit summary manually, but I'm not aware of a consensus on this either. I probably ought to search Bugzilla to find any existing ticket about this behavior. But I digress... --SoledadKabocha (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the guideline was new to me. But now that I've reread the guideline, I understand the point: it's for choosing redirects to exclude from printed copies of Wikipedia subsets. I'll try to read over the most commonly used printworthy and unprintworthy categories. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 15:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's also important to track merges and moves for attribution reasons. In fact, I think this MediaWiki installation is configured to add the latter automatically when a page is moved. Anyway, I'll let you decide what you feel is worth categorizing. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just noticed I apparently put commons:File:Puyo-guide-1.svg, commons:File:Puyo-guide-2.svg and commons:File:Puyo-guide-3.svg as PD-self, even though the originals were CC/GFDL, and you corrected the source and author on the first image. Just wanted to let you know I've done the same thing for the second and third. ~ Keiji (iNVERTED) (Talk) 17:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Vt4278 reverted your edits about carrier cramming, calling them "misinformation." Just letting you know in case you wish to discuss the matter further; I am neutral.

Sorry for not noticing earlier. I wasn't sure whether to post here or on the article's talk page first. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 03:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware. You can usually at least check the talk page to see whether I've noticed the revert on my "poor-man's watchlist" (as you called it) and started BRD. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed that talkpage post but failed to compare its date against that of the edit in question, mainly because it was a reply to a different user. Sorry for any inconvenience. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that might happen if the reverter preemptively begins the discussion, sort of a hybrid between BRD and BDRD. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aholic to the article Addiction. Since you had some involvement with the Aholic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. (OOPS.) If you look at the next -Aholic nomination, you'll see why I found this redirect. No offense intended. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oholic to the article Addiction. Since you had some involvement with the Oholic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 03:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

I think your change at CompactFlash is didactic; everyone knows what a "Microdrive" is, and that two are "Microdrives." However, if you wish to restrict a trademark to the uses its owners prefer, that's fine, except that you didn't do so consistently, for instance to the title of the next section down from the one that you edited. If you insist, please start over and edit the entire page. Spike-from-NH (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done in part. I've reworded much of the article to use a generic term. But changing a heading requires a bit more consensus than changing section body text, as anchors are generated from headings. I'll wait to see if my change sticks and then use {{anchor}}. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 04:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's better; thanks. Indeed it's wise to wait for any cataclysm from the first round of edits before changing section headings. Spike-from-NH (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]