User talk:Freshacconci

Freshacconci is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

On 7 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flight Stop, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that each of the sixty geese in Michael Snow's Flight Stop (pictured) is wearing a costume made from photographs of a dead Canada goose culled from Toronto Island? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flight Stop. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Flight Stop), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

On 22 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Picture for Women, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Picture for Women by Canadian artist Jeff Wall is a photographic response to Édouard Manet's last major painting, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Picture for Women. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Please note: I am no longer archiving this talk page. Only serious comments will be acknowledged. All others will be erased.

This user is one of the 2000 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

	The Original Barnstar
	I went through your contributions. How can I connect with you? Thanks for your earlier guidance on wiki edit policy. SriSriChinmaya (talk) 07:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source I provided is reliable and from a peer-reviewed art historical journal, The Burlington Magazine. This is valid new information about Hopper's earliest oils and corrects the existing outdated information. Please revert to my updated text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljs90 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked to discuss this on the article talk page. freshacconci (✉) 14:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have done so. Ljs90 (talk —Preceding undated comment added 15:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I have to disagree with you regarding the photograph which you believe to be Nico, performing with the Velvet Underground in Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1966.

Nico never wore dresses onstage with the Velvets, certainly not flowery patterns! She wore trouser suits. We can verify this was the case for the Ann Arbor show specifically, thanks to a news article covering the actual event: Velvet Underground Live at the Ann Arbor Film Festival, Detroit, Michigan, on the 12th of March 1966. The concert was reviewed by the Detroit Free Press on Tuesday 15 March 1966. The reviewer describes the show as, "a combination of film and live music and dance. While a beautiful blond girl sang, her image was projected on three separate 'screens,' including her own white jacket." The review is accessible online via Newspapers.com - https://www.newspapers.com/image/97864650/?terms=%22Festival%2C%2Band%2Bfilms%2Bby%2BWarhol%22

See also: https://dangerousminds.net/comments/amazing_mod_wedding_with_andy_warhol_the_velvet_underground_nico_1966?fbclid=IwAR0wCIQ03KWf2Pn3D2mH4n3hxeKciq0gC1_Ydb9PEa7xvAYRtmn-gJ2ZLsg

I have another image of Nico onstage with the Velvet Underground in Michigan, November 1966, with Catherine James also in the same shot (in a similar cut of dress and physical posture). In the pic, Nico is wearing her white trouser suit. It's from the same event covered in the Dangerous Minds article, but wasn't included. I can't find the picture online anywhere so can't link to it. I'm afraid I don't have copyright clearance for this picture, but I can upload it here if that's okay?

Essentially, though, the proof is in the Detroit Free Press article I've quoted.

I hope you'll agree that this is not actually Nico after all, and I hope you find the materials interesting!

All the best,

Jvernon123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernon123 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

How do you expect me to cite sources for a conspiracy theorist section? Considering this, there are no "credible" resources that I would be able to site.

I spent hours writing this section. Everything that I wrote is true. Would you want me to site sources from all internet sources?

I find this highly disrespectful. I went out of my way to do research and actually write something that I have actually have knowledge of.

Do you want me to site articles? If so I will gladly do so.

Thanks. PolitiFactUSA (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at I Am the Walrus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 14:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...in regards to "She's A Woman" I do believe I have provided links/references (e.g. Official Charts Company, Record Collector^[1][2] etc) that are reliable sources and are from a neutral point of view, with no original research. The fact that "She's A Woman" was a Top 20 hit in the UK and not for the Beatles, is a fact...and I cannot see why it wouldn't be a fact - look if Candy Flip's rubbish version of Strawberry Fields Forever is allowed in that article then surely Scritti should be mentioned under She's A Woman, Suggs under I'm Only Sleeping and Oasis' cover of I am The Walrus too in that article. Oasis should be mentioned in the I Am The Walrus article too, because they are mentioned under I'm Only Sleeping and thats only because someone found a YouTube clip of Stereophonics with Oasis. However, when it comes to Beatles tunes Oasis are probably better known for their version of I am The Walrus^[3] seeing that Oasis are one of the most important bands in the last 30 years (in the United Kingdom anyway)...much more than Candy Flip ever were, who might just get a mention in some quarters of the press these days thanks to Robbie's Rudebox)...could be infobox worthy).

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi (Jan Mostaert) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Season's greetings!
	I hope this holiday season is festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2021 will be safe, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 12:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stan Douglas Abbott and Cordova.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

European American is not an ethnic group that includes all immigrants from Europe. Europe is diverse genetically and culturally.

Officially there is 87 ethnic groups recognized as Native peoples of Europe.

I am a Russian minority American of European Russia and if you think I’m going to say my ethnicity is European American you’re dead wrong. Cause it isn’t. And you will never get me to say otherwise. I’m closer to a few Siberian groups than I am to some Europeans both genetically and culturally.

And on my forms it says “Russian/Udmurt” as ethnicity. And you can take me to court if you want to change that. EurasianCultures (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are 87 ethnic groups officially recognized as native to Europe*

-Grammatical error “There is 87” EurasianCultures (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think the Standard of Ur is made between 1600 and 1400 BC? For what I know it is about 1000 years older. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.132.122.131 (talk) 20:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for commenting on my additions, really light touches, to my own website. I know I shouldn`t have done it, but I was in a correcting mood. I have seen your corrections as I work and know you are a serious student of Canadian art! Glad to meet you!Joan arden murray (talk) 16:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Freshacconci:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Season's greetings!
	I hope this holiday season is safe, festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2022 will be safe, healthy, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 16:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was the editor who originally added Kellner, I believe. I did so after reading Best and Kellner. I'm rethinking this, as I read more material on the subject. At a minimum, the length of the text on Kellner seems disproportionate. Perhaps you are correct that he deserves inclusion, but with less (somewhat too detailed) exposition. Thoughts? sbelknap (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Has this LTA been active recently? I have just noticed that on their SPI casepage, there have been no reports of activity since 2018, and was wondering if I could archive the WP:LTA page. Thank you, Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Season's greetings!
	I hope this holiday season is safe, festive and fulfilling and filled with love and kindness, and that 2023 will be safe, healthy, successful and rewarding...keep hope alive....Modernist (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my talk page in 2014.

I have returned 9 years later.

Please disregard my prior contributions.

Joey7898 (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Freshacconci,

My interests are topics such as the Visual Arts and specifically Contemporary Art. And I have been an avid reader of Wikipedia and a silent observer(and appreciator) of it's growth as a community since the last 15 years. I officially joined over 12 years ago. So my contribution as an article, on this topic I found, that I created all that while back; I'd like to genuinely contribute and build towards: hoping it would be part of the Featured Article column someday. Taking this opportunity to share how I sincerely look up to how you've channeled your thoughts on your talk page, and it's perhaps my reading experience that tells me you'd be of great help.

Which bring me to my request of seeking your help and guidance. I'd like you to perhaps contribute your time and effort in helping me build this further. Article: Manav Gupta

As you're perhaps more experienced on due process. I wanted to add the following images to Wikipedia and consequently the article: Section Paintings: sold by Christies, Bonhams: Umbilical Cords of Earth, Air, Water, Fire, Space, Non Limiting Horizons, Public Art Installations and Projects: River Waterfront, Beehives, Rain, Rainforest and the Beehive GardenAnd would be grateful if you could help upload these.

The following banner template was added over 9 years ago by you on the page of Manav Gupta.

This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

As one can note, the article has had significant improvements following and adhering to Wikipedia: Manual of Style/Biography and Wikipedia: Biography dos and don'ts in the edit of 2023.

In adherence to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, I have done no original research on this subject. This is simply my contribution towards doing justice to topics such as biographies of living persons and adding to Wikipedia: WikiProject Visual arts. I'd like to believe that I have been thorough in citing notable references to any text placed in the article. The text used in the article does use facts and attribution to demonstrate it's existence.

Having stated all of this, I would like to humbly request you to please remove any wordings that do not meet the criteria of existing at all, in the article. I would sincerely appreciate if you could take some time out and provide me with some feedback on what I should do to better report and formalise my thoughts. But above all for you to perhaps show me how one can address such issues by your kind contribution towards solving this and taking it a step closer to featured article criteria status.

Warm Regards,

Max roosevelt (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Terry Kirkman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 12:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

curious why you reverted this violation of bio?

thanks in advance, 98.247.164.220 (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, on Penny Lane, you reverted my addition of the {{Jargon}} tag on a section. It's complete jargon! It's got nonsense about pitches and vocals that no one who isn't an experienced musician would understand without further context! 92.40.212.153 (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Half Barnstar
	Gonna find someone called “Stub” (cuz ur User:FA) and give them the other half 48JCL (talk • contribs) 21:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Michael snow wavelength.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]