User talk:Gasparoff

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gasparoff! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Abishe (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Abishe! I'm sure it will be very useful. Gasparoff (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your reversal of my edit and I think the language you used in the new line is much more acceptable. While Russian speakers may have been discriminated against following the passing of the law, the previous claim of massacres being committed against said population was spurious and was parroting popular Kremlin talking points. I'm not for cancelling Russians, but I am for removing stuff like that.

I do still think reference [4] is a bit garbage though because the guy seems a bit off, but if you want to leave it be that's fine. I just get the vibe he is a pro-Corbyn Labour type (aka pro-Russian lefty). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.78.102.16 (talk) 15:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Well, it doesn't really matter if the critics are from "leftists", "pro-Corbin", "communists" or "redheads". The referenced link mentions a man who was a head of UN Peacekeeping operations. To say "he is right" just because of that would be a fallacy of recourse to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam); to say that he or they are invalid just because of "who they are", is an ad-hominem fallacy. The fact is that, in such a long and detailed article, it is legitimate and necessary to state that there are criticisms in this regard, and that is an objective fact. Thank you for your message. Gasparoff (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gasparoff

Thank you for creating Law of Ukraine "to ensure the functioning of the Ukrainian language as the State language".

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you from Galicia! (the one in SW-EU). Gasparoff (talk) 03:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, San Clemente Literary Prize, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Surely if it is existed for 24 years there must be more than 2 news articles about it?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:San Clemente Literary Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gasparoff. Thank you for your work on Os renovadores. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gasparoff. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:San Clemente Literary Prize, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xiao, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gião, Julian and Galician.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, what's the use for the category: Category:Galician films in The Beasts? It is a film co-produced by a Catalan company, a Madrilenian company and a French company by a Madrilenian director. The Galician setting in the film is already contained in Category:Films set in Galicia (Spain) and the Galician dialogue in Category:Galician-language films. The film was not even qualifying for the Mestre Mateo Awards. What kind of arcane criteria are you using for adding the category in other articles?--Asqueladd (talk) 06:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Asqueladd,

Thank you for your concerns. While The Beasts is co-produced by Hispanic (Catalan & Madrilenian) and French companies, and directed by a Basque-origin Madrilenian, there are several reasons to consider it also a Galician film: It is based on real events that happened in Santoalla, Petín, grounding it in the Galician context (it's not only "located in Galicia" as TLOTR is in New Zealand, but it refers to a Galician story that took place there); Key roles (and some secondary ones) are played by Galician actors such as Luís Zahera, Diego Anido, Pepo Suevos, Federico Pérez, Javi Varela, Xavier Estévez, etc. who speak Galician in the original version, as you may know. The title is also in Galician (As bestas), even in the French and Spanish versions; And it is included in Categoría:Filmes de Galicia in Galipedia, indicating its recognition within the Galician context. Despite the diverse production background, the film's significant Galician elements justify its inclusion in the "Galician films" category. However, I understand if there's consensus to exclude it based on production criteria.

Best regards, Gasparoff (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Galician fictional setting is contained in Category:Films set in Galicia (Spain). The Galician shooting location is contained in Category:Films shot in Galicia (Spain) (or any subcategory). The use of the Galician language by actors is cointained in Category:Galician-language films. LOTR is shot in New Zealand but it is not set in New Zealand. Thus The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is categorised in Category:Films shot in New Zealand but it is not categorised in Category:Films set in New Zealand but in Category:Middle-earth (film franchise) films (a subcategory of Category:Films set in Middle-earth). I actually question any utility for the category you have created other than grouping subcategories of films produced by Galician outfits (which this film is not, not by a long measure), because haphazard and ellusive criteria are not a good recipe for categorization, and they do not follow conventional practices in here anyways.--Asqueladd (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I did was transfer to English a category that already existed on Wikipedia in Galician, Portuguese, Basque and Catalan. I have seen that it was also created in Arabic from English, although with a different code than the others. Gasparoff (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you did, but if there is no intent to connect the category to objective production criteria, I don't think that transfer was a particularly useful idea, to be honest. And still I can imagine more useful ways to address the production angle. Arabic-language Wikipedia categories are automatically created from English-language Wikipedia categories by a bot only by requiring a single (shared) categorised article.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also saw what you did by reversing my edit in "The Beasts", and, also to be honest, I didn't undo the reversal either. I understand the criteria of the other wikipedias with that category, I understand your point, and I didn't come here to argue. Best regards Gasparoff (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Galician films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Galician animated films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]