User talk:Guest9999

Archive 1 · Archive 2

Chesley Sullenberger was in the news, again, this week. I thought I would to go Talk:Chesley Sullenberger, and review the arguments offered by those who initially argued for redirection or deletion. I was surprised at how adamant some of you were.

Do you still think this article should be deleted or redirected? Geo Swan (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your update. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. About this edit you made: I don't mind you fixing that mistake - actually I am happy that you noticed. So don't feel bad about it :-) Regards SoWhy 20:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the bad image. Since the image has been replaced, would you mind striking that the list fails 5b (assuming all else looks good). Just trying to make sure I have done what needs to be done. Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to upload a pair of Jack Finney's original covers pictures. They belong to defunct publishing companies. Do you know if I can do it? Apologize my English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.137.158.172 (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I'm not sure what this is about, are you sure if it was me you meant to leave the message for? My memory isn't brilliant so it's possible I've just forgotten, sorry if that's the case. I'm not an expert on copyright, depending on their age and if a copyright notice was given it's possible the images are in the public domain. If they are not then they would have to meet all the criteria set out at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria - assuming they haven't been released under a free license. The best thing to do would be to ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions where - if you give some more details - I'm sure someone with the appropriate knowledge would be able to help. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Super Obama World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Game is non-notable. According to WP:VG/GL, "Articles on video games should give an encyclopedic overview of a game and its importance to the industry." This article does not do that.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yekrats (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, in the current state, the article is non-notable. Clearly WP:VG/GL would dictate that the article must state why it is notable as a video game. Is it more notable than any of the other hundreds of flash games about Obama available? -- Yekrats (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I'm out of line with the proposal, but I think I'm proper to renominate this. See Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#If you disagree with the consensus: from "If you think that an article was wrongly kept after the AFD, you could wait to see if the article is improved to overcome your objections; if it isn't, you can renominate it for deletion. If and when you do renominate, be careful to say why you think the reasons proffered for keeping the article are poor, and why you think the article must be deleted." If I made an error of protocol, please let me know... -- Yekrats (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I removed the prod, and put up this. I'm sorry about the inappropriate protocol. -- Yekrats (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky Gervais Show Season 5 Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Throne of blood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Space Viking (pb cover 02).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary schools are excluded from a7, not elementary schools. Woogee (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current consensus is at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Education. Woogee (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would have redirected to a more appropriate page, but there wasn't any. Woogee (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was this edit not worthy of more than a four-word summary? The templates do exactly the same thing and there is no need to have two separate code bases here. I'm going to re-merge unless there's a better reason than "don't see the point". Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelScott.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that this information :("Named structures: When the occupant of a particular house becomes famous the building may take person's name. For example, Chatham House, the current home of the United Kingdom's"..., etc.) has another place on WP? I agree it's not pure disambiguation but it is key to understanding what the word "house" is used for. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 22:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can I ask about your rationale for merging Ursula Vernon with Digger (webcomic), as no discussion has been made about the move on either talk page? I believe the subject of the page meets notability guidelines and if a merger is to occur between the two pages it would make more sense to merge Digger (Webcomic) into the Ursula Vernon page under a 'Significant works' section or similar... Cheers - HelioSmith (talk) 16:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt response. I agree that many of the articles relating to webcomics need work to improve them. Another user has already reversed the merge. I think the Ursular Vernon page certainly needs more work on it, especially in making her other significant works more clear. I'll give the page a work over in the near future. Cheers - HelioSmith (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be advisable to discuss most of the merges before doing so. The fact that you're simultaneously strip mining any webcomic-related links into smaller single pages and petitioning for the deletion of a relevant award page and related sections... well even though I assume good faith, you're not giving off the appearance of it.

Also, you're not gaining any credibility by the fact that you're linking "merge" to "Merge (SQL)". --Human.v2.0 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be short: If you intend to merge an article, post something on the talk page. I have numerous articles that are on my watchlist for "maintenance purposes". Just because a page doesn't have active edits doesn't men that it doesn't have people paying attention or that the article has lost merit. If pages could be deleted based on edit frequency, a good many would be long gone. Just don't do it. And don't simultaneously be nominating pages in a specific small category and be merging articles int hat category. This is akin to editing chunks out of articles and then nominating them for deletion; it's both unfair and disingenuous.

AfD ending in delete are kinda misrepresentive when involving a small number of editors keeping tabs on the page. You can claim all the pages ending in deletion you want, but how many people where aware of the situation? Aside from the few editors with an addition to AfD, the examples you mentioned are not something where you are going to have a lot of active editation involved. This isn't a sign that they should be deleted, though, just that they would almost automatically end in deletion.

With your "merge" edit I had to go with certain assumptions, but you've proven your own though process in your response. I just don't believe that it's correct. For starters, I don't see a need. Anything involving "webcomic" already has enough editors seeking wholesale removal. You can argue against that all you want, but there are very few examples that I haven't seen pages nominated for deletion after vote and vote-some-more with well-reasoned dissent. The merges do not seem to be all in the best interest, for the least of which reason being that they do not all seem to have been merged into the "more notable" category.

In the case of the one I first noticed, involving "Errant Story", the author/artist is notable for the work, not the other way around. Also, you have two works which have conflicting notoriety.

It's late, I'm tired, and I'll respond more in the morning. The fact is that the merges do not accomplish an actual goal, and when combined with AfD activity they only really lead to the possibility of unnecessary and unwarranted deletion.

More at a more reasonable hour. Human.v2.0 (talk) 04:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that Human.v2.0 commented on at least a couple of your recent slew of undiscussed mergers (you commented on his talk page that it would be good to have a central forum for such discussions. There is one: WP:PM). I am concerned that a lot of content and some categorization is being discarded in some of these mergers, though I can appreciate the desire to have topics become more compact if they are not being updated and involve short articles. As you know, I have opposed some of your proposals for deletion in the past, and it frankly bothers me that someone with a history of aiming to quickly destroy content in a topic area (webcomics) without engaging formerly active editors of articles in discussion about it is being so bold in that topic area again. At least with redirects, you're right, people can see what content has not been transferred and revert the merge, unlike with a page deletion. Netmouse (talk) 17:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We may still need a page for that article but I will need to get more info on the compound to evade copyright issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yid (talk • contribs) 17:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted your addition/merger to the David Farley (the travel author/writer/journalist) page because he is not the same person as David Farley of "Doctor Fun" fame. See here: www.dfarley.com

Thanks for uploading File:Kajraare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BabyPac-Man arcadeflyer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BabyPac-Man arcadeflyer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, for things that it is not an obvious case, then I don't speedy delete, but if unsure I suppose we should use {{subst:copyvio}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BabyPac-Man arcadeflyer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The-sorcerer's-apprentice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ConquerorLobbyCard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stark Raving Dad.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion.

— raekyT 00:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thowtf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Die Ärzte - Paul cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Wild Thornberrys has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've processed all of the orphaned images that you list at User:Guest9999/Orphaned images, transferring them all to Commons. I don't know if you want to repopulate the page with new orphaned images, or if you want to have the page deleted (if you want to go the latter way, just nominate it for speedy deletion as U1). But you probably should know that the images on there now have been attended to. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:N64 Diddy Kong Racing taj.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AreYouThereGod.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Super Mario Kart characters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PCHS NJROTC.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NOT-PLOT highlight.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:44, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:How the west was won322.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Guest9999.

I write to you because I need to use that photo File:BystanderEB1926.jpg.

I want to know if I may use it to illustrate the french article about fr:Edmond Blampied ?

I hope I can use it. Thank you for your answer. 2.0.206.26 (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't know about the image use policies on French Wikipedia. Guest9999 (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nikon Coolpix s1000pj projecting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stoogesvol4.jpg copy4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yum! Kitchen and Bakery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1. no indication of notability 2. advert

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Journey into Fear (1943 film) poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying you as I noticed your impressive work on the GA Quality article, Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 22:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spook Who Sat by the Door 1973.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wapsi Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wapsi Square (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yellowsky dvdcover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Music Madness Plus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PTO-LOM.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ivan Drach crop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guest9999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Donovan (film). Since you had some involvement with the Paul Donovan (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lexx has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guest9999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ANightattheOperaStateroom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guest9999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]