User talk:Jay D. Easy

I just saw that you are modifying all articles containing Dutch "von", "de" and so on. Just to be clear, and to avoid that mistake in the future, the first letter of these affixes should only go lowercase if the first name precedes it? Or is there another exception?--ReyHahn (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, ReyHahn. That's correct. The first name or an initial. Jay D. Easy (t • c) 20:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to check if the subject is actually Dutch before renaming pages, the latter name in Frank–van der Merwe growth is South African. Although the same capitalizations rules apply here, I suggest checking for the origin of the name manually in each case.Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Pieceofmetalwork. The first tussenvoegsel in a Dutch family name is always capitalized if not preceded by the subject's given name or initial, be they Dutch, Belgian, South African, Surinamese, or any other nationality of Dutch descent. Jay D. Easy (t • c) 20:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted your alphabetic ordering of categories at Guus Til because it violated WP:FOOTY convention. See this recent discussion at WP:FOOTY: [1] The convention is based on MOS:CATORDER which states: "Normally the most essential, significant categories appear first." Please do not change the ordering of categories of football articles to be alphabetical. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, could you explain why you removed the category "Vietnamese people of Dutch descent" from Nguyễn van Bakel's article? Van Bakel was born in the Netherlands and acquired Vietnamese citizenship. Wouldn't that make him a Vietnamese person of Dutch descent? You wrote "tw" in your edit summary which doesn't ring a bell. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, J. - Adding the lifespan to the short description is standard practice, not disambiguation. I understand that his birth year is required for disambiguation, but that doesn't mean the lifespan including year of death should not also be there. Thx for listening. Blainster (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Argumentum ad antiquitatem. WP:SDDATES: "Dates or date ranges are encouraged where they would: (a) enhance the short description as an annotation or (b) improve it as a disambiguation." I don't know any other film directors named Sidney Lumet. Do you? WP:SD40: "no more than 40 characters". Right now without dates it's already at 49 characters. Jay D. Easy (t • c) 00:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your page move is contested. Please seek consensus by starting a page move discussion. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 13:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jay, in a 2019 edit of yours on the page Miniconjou you cited an article by S.B. Doyle as the source for a list of "Other notable Miniconjou". I've checked Doyle's article, p. 66, but I couldn't find either the list or all the names included in it. I wonder if you could take a look at the matter. Cheers. Jeanambr (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW: the list includes both a "Spotted Elk, son of Lone Horn, half-brother of Touches the Clouds" and a "Chief Spotted Elk, later known as "Chief Big Foot", who is claimed, in the related article, to be precisely a son of Lone Horn.

Check the edit again. I think you may be confused. Jay D. Easy (t • c) 20:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 23:58, 10 February 2019 revision as edited by 2601:541:8202:96:f48e:cef1:312f:4f39 (oldid 890479744) reads: "Other noted Miniconjou:" (without notes);

The 16:17, 1 April 2019 revision as edited by you (oldid 882729220) reads: "Other notable Miniconjou::^[1]".

In fact, I am now realizing that you did not enter the footnote yourself, but simply moved it to the wrong place. Cheers.--Jeanambr (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in joining the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy, subjects " Capitalising or omitting words in Dutch surnames and Guidance on amalgmating multiple pages that contain spelling variations of the same name I am especially interested in your opinion because you still seem to be interested in the Tussenvoegsel article, whereas the auctor intellectualis( Rex Germanus) of that article seems to have huffily withdrawn from Wikipedia. I am especially interested in what you could contribute on the alternative "separable family-name affix" (Note the notion "separable affix" is currently noted in the lede of Affix. but the concept itself is a redirect page to Separable verb). Ereunetes (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is a GA, might I suggest using the article talk page? --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you made a mistake while editing the most consecutive wins section because you didn't edit the rowspan. I've corrected the error.

I'm telling you this because you asked 'what are you doing'? Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What rowspan? Only mistakes I see are the ones that you added. Jay D. Easy (t) 15:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

go view the page history. you forgot to edit the page properly and thus the rows and columns were out of place. I changed that Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how the columns and rows were out of place here and here. Jay D. Easy (t) 15:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

seems like there was an intervening edit which confused things a little. no worries, I was working towards the same thing you were anyway Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad that's cleared up. I'm going to do one final edit now to fix your mistakes. Jay D. Easy (t) 15:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what mistakes? the page is now in optimal condition after I corrected your previous edit which coincidentally even you had corrected Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cool just saw your edit and you corrected an errant 5 and Hungarian Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly do get the feeling that you're having some difficulty interpreting a page's revision history. Please see H:DIFF. It explains how to compare page revisions quite well. Jay D. Easy (t) 15:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no i'm not, you just made an edit in the time i was editing is all Becausewhynothuh? (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also: Help:Page history#Using a history page. Specifically the bit about prev, which is what I often rely on to see specific changes. Jay D. Easy (t) 16:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, if you are looking for ideas for new projects, the {{Railway accidents and incidents}} template would greatly benefit from the same improvement in the date format that you developed for the Aviation accidents and incidents template. This should be discussed first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains but I can't imagine the idea facing much opposition. Of all the railway accident templates currently in use, I have already converted half from the old format to the vad format, so the remaining half could be converted directly to the new date format, once it's implemented. -- Deeday-UK (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The idea has crossed my mind, too. Shouldn't be all that difficult to implement. Go ahead and initiate the proposal at WP:WPT and I'll monitor the response. Jay D. Easy (t) 16:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Francis Crozier (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Post-nominals/FJI-cats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of the Central African Republic, Washington, D.C., to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the Central African Republic, Washington, D.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]