User talk:Keithbob

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Keithbob is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hi, Keithbob! Hope you are well and don't mind my reaching out to you. I see that you've been offline a bit recently, so am dropping a note here in the hopes it reaches you. Previously, you'd a series of constructive edits to HubSpot and I'm wondering if you could give three edit HubSpot-related edit requests of mine a second review? All three were declined recently by an editor going through the edit request queue, but that editor has not responded to my responses to him.

The requests include:

• Talk:HubSpot#Proposed_addition: Requesting the addition of a subsection HubSpot CRM Free
• Talk:Comparison_of_CRM_systems#Addition_of_HubSpot: Requesting the addition of HubSpot CRM Free to the tables
• Talk:Comparison_of_Mobile_CRM_systems#Addition_of_HubSpot: Requesting the addition of HubSpot CRM Free to the table

I have a conflict of interest as I'm here on behalf of HubSpot through my work with Beutler Ink, so I'm seeking editors to review my requests. I appreciate any input. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've commented on the talk page -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like its been resolved! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda but I started on Wikipedia 9 1/2 years ago!!  :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I noticed that you are precious only four years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then it is my 4th anniversary of being precious!! Thank you!  :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 22:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Last year you tagged Michael Mamas for proposed deletion. Just a courtesy note that the deletion was contested at WP:REFUND today, and the article has been restored. Obviously, it is eligible to be nominated for the AfD process. —C.Fred (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Keithbob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	Have a WikiChristmas and a PediaNewYear
	Be well. Keep well. Have a lovely Christmas. SilkTork (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:European window.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Journal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC discussion might interest you based on your past discussion on this subject: Talk:Elon_Musk#Rfc:_Musk_as_an_engineer --David Tornheim (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you haven't been around in quite a while Keithbob. I hope you are well and are just busy with life. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eckhart Tolle, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hipal (talk) 23:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Péter Fülöp (ceramist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Fülöp (ceramist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Bacchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Bacchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mottezen (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keithbob, I am reaching out to you because I noticed your active participation in WP:Business and your involvement in other private equity and hedge fund entries on Wikipedia. I work for Tetragon Financial Group and have declared my COI in accordance with Wikipedia policy. I recently posted an edit request to update and clarify some of the details currently in the article. I'd be grateful for your review of my request and the opportunity to collaborate with you in improving this article. Thank you! CC for Tetragon (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]