User talk:Luciapop

Hello, Luciapop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Why you reverted my recent edit made to the article Prithviraj Sukumaran ?. As you can see there is no article on Wikipedia mentioning Sukumaran as Sukumaran Nair. It is a well-known fact as well as referenced that he was simply known by the name Sukumaran rather than Sukumaran Nair. Outlander^07@talk 09:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert referenced edits blatantly as you did here. Outlander^07@talk 10:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop -- Welcome! I've declined your speedy request on ABZY Cool because A7 only applies in a very limited set of circumstances -- mainly people, companies/organisations (but not schools), web content, and organised events -- and can't be applied to other classes of article, including television channels or products. Additionally the article must make no credible claims of significance at all (even if completely unsourced); in this case, producing two shows with articles would count as a claim. The details are at WP:A7. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you’re creating some great new articles. Thank you and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help with anything. Mccapra (talk) 14:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:HedgeFundJohn, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I do not see how this is promotional in nature. It is perfectly acceptable to have a short introduction about oneself on one's user page. . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JavaHurricane 13:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:TCU9999/Planet Plus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatant promotion or advertising. Please review WP:G11, WP:SPAM and WP:PROMOTION to see what constitutes spam and what doesn't. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JavaHurricane 13:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:KatarinaSuur/ACE Logistics Group AS, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Empty page that nowhere is promoting anything. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JavaHurricane 13:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Anfenee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Luciapop (talk) 12:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Women in Red Barnstar
	I present this award to you in recognition of your exceptional hard work and tireless effort in helping WP:WOMRED. Victuallers (talk) 16:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lucia!

I found this article you accepted and loved it, I think it would be great to see more articles like it. It seems like a lot of the wiki-editors are quite biased against younger people, I've written an article about a really nice human who went to my school. I'm from a disadvantaged background, so it really means a lot to some of us from Weston-Super-Mare to have an example we can look at and feel included. I've worked really hard to get it accepted, but feel like a lot of editors are just ignoring me. It would make me so happy to get this accepted. I even added a bunch of references since last input from an editor. I really hope you could accept this article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:William_Beauchamp_(entrepreneur) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trialan (talk • contribs) 10:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		I saw the many articles you've created recently. Thank you for adding to Wikipedia's richness and covering African women, who are so often overlooked in our coverage. Ganesha811 (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luciapop, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Go Phightins! 02:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I really like your new page for Tall Fatou Souko, but it needs a little bit of tidying - in particular the final paragraph, where the first sentence needs clarification. Plus that paragraph needs some references! Thanks for creating the page, if know of any further sources than the three you list, please do add them too. Any questions, please message me Lajmmoore (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Spicy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Biased Pluralism and Fossil Fuel Production, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Spicy (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spicy, can you kindly explain the reasons for the action so I can learn from it. Thanks. Luciapop (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's an unencyclopedic essay that repeatedly cites Wikipedia. Spicy (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I saw Wikipedia in the list of sources cited but wasn't sure of editorial guideline on that to guide my action on the page. Thanks. Luciapop (talk) 14:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Miami Magic FC Academy, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TAXIDICAE💰 17:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

A tag has been placed on Parsiq, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hi,

I created this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aditya_Tiwari with more references. The earlier version of this page was approved. However, it was speedily deleted as a recreation of the article that was up at AFD.

I request you to kindly look into it and help me revive the page.

This writer, author, and activist has brought about significant change in the queer space in a country like India, where “queer rights” are a lot more necessary and required. This page qualifies and should be included on Wikipedia because this person has sufficient notability to be here. Tiwari is now far more notable as of February 2021.

- - -  

https://www.thequint.com/neon/gender/narendra-modi-government-on-same-sex-marriage-activists-lgbtqia-reaction https://www.gqindia.com/get-smart/content/instagram-poets-weigh-in-on-the-pandemic https://www.grazia.co.in/lifestyle/culture/this-is-how-queer-people-find-comfort-in-friendships-during-the-pandemic-7617.html https://gal-dem.com/was-2020-the-beginning-of-the-end-of-gender/ https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2021/07/10547113/queer-coming-of-age — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plushwiki21 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luciapop, Plushwiki21, I'm trying to pool discussion at Talk:Wiki Loves Pride, so you can show your sources there. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop, thank you for reviewing Draft:Vecteezy. Can you help me understand why this was denied for lack of notability? To clarify, Inc and Forbes are cited with dedicated press on this topic. These are major bonafide publishers. Additionally, local newspapers and an educational institution have published about it. One source quantifies that 70 people earn a living as employees of this business. All of these are legitimate, unbiased sources with significant reach. I want to make sure I understand why this was denied so I can fix the issue moving forward. Thank you in advance! Expressive101 (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Epressive101, It was declined because sources cited are not reliable. The source from Forbes is considered unreliable because it was written by a contributor not a staff. Other sources are PR spin for the company. To establish notability you need to cite reliable independent secondary sources. Luciapop (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for clarifying that user:Luciapop. I'm still not sure I understand though. Looking at similar topics, the majority of sources cited for articles like Shutterstock and 123RF for example are not "reliable independent secondary sources." They appear to be PR or owned channels (for example, the website of the topic itself). Why is it permissible in those cases? I appreciate the feedback - this is helpful. Expressive101 (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Expressive101, each page or article created is treated on its own individual merit. Luciapop (talk) 05:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multumesc tare mult pentru feedback. Este primul meu articol, si nu imi este foarte clar, nici dupa ce am citit despre realiable sources si citare, ce alte surse as putea sa bag la articolul cu Marian Preda. El este intr-adevar o persoana importanta care merita un articol pe Wiki prin prisma functiei pe care o detine la cea mai vizibila universitate din Romania. Ai vreo idee vis-a-vis de ce alte surse mai realiable as putea sa folosesc? Multumesc tare mult, o zi insorita!

AdelinaStoica (talk) 08:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SoftTalk Messenger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftTalk Messenger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarioGom (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.86.98.200.220 (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victory Obasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Obasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iseoluwa Abidemi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iseoluwa Abidemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Balcazar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Balcazar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luciapop. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Luciapop. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Luciapop|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ikenna Ikeme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikenna Ikeme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omasan Ogisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omasan Ogisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khamis Chuwal Lom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khamis Chuwal Lom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 22:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saeed Lom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeed Lom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farida Benyahia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farida Benyahia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exalgina Gambôa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exalgina Gambôa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ugbedeg per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugbedeg. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MarioGom. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Iseoluwa Abidemi, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MarioGom (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Simple Azenabor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 22:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luciapop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henriette Lagou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luciapop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victory Obasi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]