User talk:Movses

I have the same problem in ukrainian wiki. When I'm clear the versions section, I can't use AWB. --Movses 10:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's very strange. You can keep the old versions enabled if you need to, but you don't need to add new versions because they will be enabled centrally. —METS501 (talk) 15:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

((unblock-auto|1=85.90.206.104|2=openproxy|3=Eagle 101))

• Eagle 101 (talk · contribs) did not block you. It appears you were trying to access your account through an open proxy and you were autoblocked as a result. You cannot log into Wikipedia through an open proxy.--Isotope23 19:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Movses. Please try again from another location and all should be well. If you continue to experience any problems, please let us know. Thanks, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't use other IP for wikipedia editing. Yes, this IP using several people (around 5). We have NAT. BUT! Other people are not editing wikipedia (only I am) and I'm not vandal. Can you explain me, why this IP was blocked ? Why you think, that this IP is open proxy or zombie comp ??? This IP using only our people and nobody more ! Yes, we use something like google spider, but we use this program not in wikipedia. --Movses 08:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to edit now, while the address remains blocked to unregistered users (and accounts cannot be registered from it, either). Please contact the administrator of your system, because there seems to be a vulnerability that allows outside users to connect from it. The Wikipedia admin who blocked your IP address may provide more details. - Mike Rosoft 08:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I can edit from this IP, I will be happy 8) --Movses 09:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot read or speak Russian or Ukrainian. You'll have to repeat your query in English. Best regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two photos of the Borges' memorial in Lisbon were added to the Commons: Borges_Lisboa_1.JPG Borges_Lisboa_2.JPG --CorreiaPM (talk) 21:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition to Zaporizhia State Medical University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://abroaduniversity.org/univer/zsmu/index.htm Whpq (talk) 17:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Доброго дня, к сожелению Я не знаю про Азербайджанские словари в интернете. Сорри но ни с чем не могу помочь на счёт этого вопроса.--NovaSkola (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ошибки нет. I am most of the time in Ukraine (when I am not in England or Slovakia). Всего доброго = --Smerus (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Movses, unfortunately I don't know enough about the subject to comment. Serouj (talk) 00:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. --Movses (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I understand that it is disconcerting to see articles blanked, but I have restored the template on Roman Volod'kov. Please read the directions and, if you do not understand the purpose of the blanking, Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo/Task explanation. The articles do need to be reviewed by contributors with no history of copyright infringement before they are restored. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Movses! You have replies about the mentioned topics on your huwiki discussion page. Bye, HoremWeb (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I think it will be good idea to continue the discussion on the page hu:Szerkesztővita:Movses.--Movses (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Movses-bot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 17:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Dobrydien!

Here is my logic for the iw links on these pages:

• The original person after which are named all the oter items on these pages is called Saint Elmo in English, San Telmo in Spanish, Saint Elme in French, Sant'Elmo in Italian, so it is only logic that the disambiguating pages with these names link to each other.
• Pages de:San Telmo and ru:Сан-Тельмо are the only disambiguation pages in their languages listing items with these names, people/places/movies/phenomenons, so they should be linked to the previous list. ca:Saint Elmo has the same role (places & movies)
• In addition to these pages, .en and .fr Wikipedias have specific pages for places/movies/younameit with the Spanish name of the saints, they should be linked together rather than the main list.
• It's harder to classify ca:Sant Elm (desambiguació), but as the items listed are about the same as en:San Telmo and fr:San Telmo it makes sense to link them together.

So in order to avoid incoherent interwiki cross-links, that makes a "generic" list of pages for all languages and a "specific" one for the 3 languages having split disambiguated items in 2 pages. I agree it's far from perfect, maybe the Russian page could be listed to the second list rather than the first (in the absence of a ru:Святой Эльм disambig page) seen its content, but then it would no longer be linked to es:San Telmo to avoid scrambling links, and that does not seem logic. Same for de:San Telmo. I'll wait your opinion before doing any more changes. What do you think? Place Clichy (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it's hard to me to understand your message :-( Can you write two (three ?) separate lists ? Something likes

1. link1 <> link2 <> link3
2. link4 <> link5 <> link6
3. link7

--Movses (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The idea is that we must keep en:Saint Elmo <> es:San Telmo <> fr:Saint Elme <> it:Sant'Elmo. So I propose:

1. en:Saint Elmo <> es:San Telmo <> fr:Saint Elme <> it:Sant'Elmo <> de:San Telmo <> ru:Сан-Тельмо <> ca:Saint Elmo
2. en:San Telmo (disambiguation) <> fr:San Telmo <> ca:Sant Elm (desambiguació)

Place Clichy (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understood what you mean. Please, give me one day (until 27-jan-2011 14:30), because I want to look more deeply. --Movses (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. You wrote The original person after which are named all the oter items on these pages is called Saint Elmo in English, San Telmo in Spanish, Saint Elme in French, Sant'Elmo in Italian. But it's incorrect ! Please see appropriate articles:

   es:Erasmo de Formia — San Erasmo de Formia, muerto hacia 303 también conocido como San Elmo

   fr:Érasme de Formia — Saint Érasme de Formia, mort vers 303, aussi connu sous le nom de saint Elme

   it:Erasmo di Formia — Sant'Erasmo, conosciuto anche come Sant'Elmo

   en:Erasmus of Formiae — Saint Erasmus of Formiae is a Christian saint and martyr who died ca. 303, also known as Saint Elmo.

   ca:Sant Erasme — Sant Erasme, també anomenat Sant Elm o Sant Erm, va ser bisbe...

   de:Erasmus von Antiochia — war ein Bischof und ist ein heiliger Märtyrer der katholischen Kirche; er ist auch unter dem Namen Elmo bzw. Ermo bekannt.

2. While your first assumption is wrong we can't use other assumptions, that were builded on first, isn't it ? And I think you know, that exist two different saints - Saint Erasmus of Formiae and Peter González.
3. I think that it's incorrect to see to some person, but it will be easier, when we will see to the letters only (Elmo in one side, Telmo in other side)
4. So, I propose these clusters:
   • en:Saint Elmo <> fr:Saint Elme <> it:Sant'Elmo <> ca:Saint Elmo
   • en:San Telmo (disambiguation) <> fr:San Telmo <> es:San Telmo<> de:San Telmo <> ru:Сан-Тельмо
   • ca:Sant Elm (desambiguació)

--Movses (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work at Oleksandr Sin. I used file.liga.net for articles about Ukrainian politicians before. But I forgot to look it up today..., thanks for the reminder! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(in Ukrainian) Нема за що (means "it's nothing") :-) --Movses (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Titanium Institute, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.timag.org/histor_e.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Movses, I removed most of the text from this article as it was mostly copied and pasted from two sources. I saw your edit summary when you removed the bot notice. Just because a website does not cite a copyright doesn't mean it isn't copyrighted. You must assume it is. Anyway, the second source had a copyright. Do not re-add the same text and use your own words. I see you have had problems with copyrights in the past. See WP:COPYPASTE for guidance on pasting text into articles even whether you change it up a little. Persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Any questions, let me know.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's trivial information. TRIVIAL ! Can you understand this ? --Movses (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it was just a typo. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 23:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the talk page of the 'Children' song. I explained this issue there. Specific citations are not to be found in the internet, but they are not quite necessary in this context.--Mdphddr (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you say the link "looks good", but revert the sentence anyway? Do you mean it ironically?--Mdphddr (talk) 22:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no irony. Just look to timestamps. Firstly I reverted your edit, because I had saw huge number of edits, claiming Sukachov's authorship. Secondly I watched your link "Dostoyanie Respubliki" and after then wrote about "looks good". --Movses (talk) 07:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see, I did not pay attention to the timestamps first. Thanks. --Mdphddr (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need to change\delete image ([1]) ! Image with Bob Dylan doesn't belong to Xu Caihou --Movses (talk) 12:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that they look enough alike that it wouldn't matter. Bob Dylan, Xu Caihou - small difference. (fixed). Thue (talk) 13:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 † is not a cross it is a dagger. Legacypac (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dagger definitely has cross shape. Legacypac, you know about it. It is really strange to use cross-shaped dagger for muslims, isn't it ? Anyway, I am fine with {{KIA2}} as  (KIA). Hope, you too. --Movses (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Movses. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Movses. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I discussed your deletions on Talk:List of language self-study programs Kim9988 (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Movses. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a long-time consensus that there no redlinks in these templates. They are navigation boxes after all and where is there to navigate without an article. Articles deleted at AFD are removed from the templates. See here[2], here[3], and here[4] for just three examples. Here's an ANI discussion[5] touching on this. @Ahunt: would you like to chime in?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what you have written is quite true. There is official guidence at WP:EXISTING, which explains: Red links and redirects should normally be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles. Red links can be retained in navigation templates that represent a well-defined and complete set of data (geographic divisions, annual events, filmographies, etc.), where deleting red links would leave an incomplete and misleading result. Even then, editors are encouraged to write the article first. A list of aviation accidents is obviously not "a well-defined and complete set of data", but more of an open ended list, given that there are many thousands of aviation accidents each year and we only have articles on a few of them. Hope that helps. - Ahunt (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]