User talk:Nigel Ish

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

and don't ping me

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®}is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Dear Nigel Ish,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Would you be so kind to tag specific sections or sentences that are dubious in some way? before removing the tag I read the entire article and made sure that I didn’t see anything suspicious. Of course you might know more about the topic than I do and you might find some things that warrant tagging. Jehochman ^Talk

I can understand removing Aviastar due to copyvio (which sucks since that site is often one of the few in English but it is what it is), but what's wrong with flugzeuginfo.net? Is it on a list of unreliable resources? Tengu99 (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

flugzeuginfo.net is a Self Published site with no evidence that it is written by an established, published expert in the field. See Wikipedia:RS/SPSNigel Ish (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The references for the Aero A.304 were taken directly from the Czech wiki page, as was the rest of the translation. No "fake" references were used that I know of. If they are fakes, then the Czech page is fake also. I've you have an issue with the references or the translation you can either state that on the talk page or correct them yourself. I'm reverting your deletion and ask that you kindly communicate your concerns in a more proper manner. Tengu99 (talk) 03:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to change it because I am not sure if it is a German thing, but in the SMS S51 (1889) article, the caliber is L40 but is says it is 45 times as long as the diameter. Llammakey (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was my mistake. Now changed.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Pre-dreadnought battleship for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 22:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you simply ignore my "Or adjust CL-415 to be in line with this article, but either way there must be more homogenity between the 2 articles" statement??? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canadair_CL-215&oldid=1251719799 D4n2016 (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because your change had the same information in the specifications twice, which is confusing to the reader, and there is no absolute need for all articles to be absolutely consistent.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]