User talk:Noopur28

Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings and feline sounds? Say it all here! Please post new topic at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic with ~~~~. And remember, Assume good faith! Click here to start a new topic.

Archives

/Archive 1

Next time you leave a Talback notice, don't archive the thread. Also, just because something exists, there is no reason for something else to exist in the same way. We had a debate about adding Indic scripts and we reached a consensus to not have them as far as possible with a few exceptions. The archived debate is on Archive 48 of the India notice board. As for notability, it does not come from marriage, and in the case of Kiran Nadar, both the foundation and art gallery don't have articles, perhaps you could've created it first. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you know articles need to be created WP:BE BOLD and fix it. My only problem with your comments is that you seem to be constantly checking the stuff I do and tagging it for maintenance while you could use the same amount of time to correct or expand the article. However, if you have issues with the article's notability, please go ahead and nominate it and we'll discuss it there. Be constructive and help expand. Wikipedia needs us on articles, not talk pages. Noopur28 (talk) 04:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have better things to do. I'm not a stalker of sorts. I have other interests. I've improved the article to a certain level and leave it up to you to edit. Also, do remember, what happens, happens due to consensus. That can happen only on the talk page. Over and out. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two refs to Kiran Nadar, removed the tag as it seems to satisfy WP:GNG. I'm on the lookout for more refs as well as data, and hope to see you on the talk page as well. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesomesauce! Will expand the article tonight. thanks :) Noopur28 (talk) 10:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Errr, what is, Awesomesauce ??? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi, saw your response on my talk, you said I can't ask them to activate stuff in preferences or i would ve done so. From this i concluded that you have not completely understood me or it seems I was unable to convey my thoughts last time. I will try again .No , No you dont need to ask them anything to install or activate. these things are already there in the edit box for every user please check yourself, if you have not noticed so far. . you can use this to add a help message for the new users who use bare URLs as refs. I frequently come across such neew users so it would be good if some one can tell them in a better way how to do it. Hence I decided to make this template.

• Now neither you nor they need to install anything. To tell the users how to add refs to wiki articles (copy paste below code)

{{subst:User:DBigXray/ref|sig=~~~~}}

using the code will add all the instructions (as seen below) along with your sign . as an example for you I am using this to add a this new sign. you can test this code on your Special:MyPage/sandbox as well. please ask if i am still not clear enough-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 04:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Noopur28! Please do not forget to add references for the content you add to Wikipedia. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
2. Then click on "templates",
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill as many details as you can,

This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time. thanks and regards -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 04:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is exactly what I am talking about. This cite button does not show up in all of their text boxes. Often, it doesn't even show up in mine. So, if I direct them to use this, what happens when it doesn't show? Noopur28 (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Often ? ? I always get the above toolbar whenever I am editing wiki. Even now as well. if sometimes you dont see it. it might be due to the fact that the page was not loaded properly and a refresh or page reload would certainly show it. see this tool bar is a standard feature of wiki page and is shown to all, irrespective of the fact that they have installed something or not.-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 05:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, not just me, User:Psubhashish faces similar issues when the 'Cite' button just disappears for a long time. We thought it might be a cache issue but, even after purging it does not reappear for him. I am attaching a screenshot for your perusal. So, in this situation we don't want to confuse the newbie especially if we are explaining referencing on chat/text/voice. However, we found a useful [reftag.appspot.com tool] suggested by User:AshLin for Google books and will use it in the future. Noopur28 (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for giving the screenshot, although I had not doubted your statement above but i will take this issue of cite not shown with the mediawiki developers at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Cite_not_shown_on_the_toolbar_on_top_of_the_editbox. This toolbar is a standard feature that shows up even for non registered users, if not visible then this certainly is a bug. the reftag.appspot is also useful but the editbox toolbar is a lot more handy (if it shows up :) ). Was just trying to help, continue with what you feel is better, cheers. -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 05:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot man! :) Never doubted your intentions, of course. Personally, that 'Cite' button is my favorite way of referencing. Do keep me posted on what happens! Happy editing!!! Noopur28 (talk) 06:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• finally I had a relaxed deep breath. I was actually feeling myself to have committed a crime before the last comment of yours :), cheers-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But, now you deserve a punishment for scaring me :P Please come and help me expand the article on Kanchipuram Sari? Noopur28 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• how can a scared kitten, scare others. marching off to Kanchipuram Sari, cheers-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 09:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ajit Chandila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ryan Vesey Review me! 07:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC) What an interesting comment...thank you for your contributions to the Society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fath1209 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noopur! Thanks for creating Ajit Chandila. I hope you understand that as an American who doesn't watch cricket, I had no way of understanding the potential the article had. Generally, it is advisable to create an article in your userspace if you can't create a claim of significance in your first edit. You are completely free to remove the CSD notice from your talk page if you desire. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have to give someone at least a minute to add a reference to an article that is just created. Or, perhaps just google it to see if the term is notable enough? Nominating for speedy deletion is a little harsh, no? I've made 27 articles so far, so I am fairly acquainted with the userspace idea however I prefer editing on articlespace. Thanks :) Noopur28 (talk) 18:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hey Ryan Vesey, that is quite a frequent problem here. Noopur, I suggest you create a few more articles. Once you cross 50, I'll nominate you for Autopatrolled. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the generous offer to resolve the frequent problem but, I suggest you read this once more: Wikipedia:HOUND#Wikihounding. I will not hesitate to contact you when I need help but, from my end this is the last message conversation I will entertain on my talk page which is not constructive or related to editing. Noopur28 (talk) 10:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank You
	With the help of contributors like you, the Tag and Assess 2012 project has achieved the planned objectives. Close to 65,000 articles have been assessed and 19,000 articles have been added to the scope of the project. Please do watch out for the post tag and assess activities. Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an article in userspace for a Bollywood film : User:AnshumanF/Abdullah (1980 film). Feedback would be much appreciated. :) AnshumanF (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Real Life Barnstar
	For constantly encouraging more and more people to join and edit in Wikipedia......continue the good work(I know you would)......... ƬheⱾtrikeҾagle ™ 10:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awww, thanks buddy! Let's make it a joint effort and get more enthusiastic new editors on board! Cheers! Noopur28 (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Indian service award
		Noticed you crossed 400 edits in the drive...hence this Indian Service Award-Silver.. ƬheⱾtrikeҾagle ™ 10:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Good job girl. Joset 19:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Noopur, I assume you're currently working on this article. A piece of advice, always start article with prose first not with infobox. This type of articles can be tagged by new page patroller, like me, for having no content. — Bill william compton^Talk 15:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopar,
I am obliged on having received the Delhi meet invitation:) But, right now I am stuck up in Hyderabad. Could you please post the dates for the same. I hope I may make it to the meet:)

Thanks & Regards,
Vaibhavgupta1989
Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 20:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopar, Thank you for the invite but I am not in India at the moment. So it is not possible for me to meet you all. And yes I did meet a few Wikipedians. Kiruba Shankar is a good friend of mine.

Regards Dinesh Cyanam (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopur, Thanks for the invite.. unfortunately i was busy in some real life commitments & wasnt accessing wikipedia. Checked your message today & although belated, its only appropriate to at least thank you for the invitation. Hoping there can be a next time

regards

 Đõc §aмέέЯ  11:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for inviting me, but it won't be possible for me to go for a meet because of my busy college schedules!

Regards ChitranshGaurav 12:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noopur28, sorry, i was away on a fieldtrip, couldn't track wiki there. missed the meeting. when are we meeting next. i will definitely make it a point to join. plz inform me. PS:- i am a JNU student. Sakalyan (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Some Vada Pav's for you
	For your contributions on the article of Indian Cuisine, which was the collaboration of the month during June 2012, for taking upto GA status under WikiProject India. Thanks for your contributions and see you at the next month's collaborations - Clothing in India and Mumbai. Happy editing, happy collaborating! :-) BPositive (talk) 07:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noopur, a minor thing i wanted to point out, in clothing of india, uve added an image of a kutchi costume, but finds no mention in the article, could u please add wht u knw of it Écrivain (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want any articles, just give the details and I'll send them to you. Best, Fanzine999 (talk) 22:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am an administrator on English Wikipedia. I saw your stalking accusation at User talk:Rsrikanth05‎, and that is a very serious accusation, thus I am investigating. I briefly looked into the edit history of you two as editors on Wikipedia, and the only article that I can see coinciding edits where you disagreed was during the writing of 2012 Guwahati molestation case which can be seen in the edit history for that page. I can't find any other pages you have editing with changes by User:Rsrikanth05, thus do not understand why you are accusing him of stalking. I would like to help resolve whatever problem there is, but I would like to see further evidence to support the accusation. Can you please point to any other locations where he has stalked your edits? Thank you very much, Sadads (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating this 2012 Guwahati molestation case. Thanks! — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 09:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to meet you in Wikimania 2012. The GLAM project is very interesting. Can you interact with Salarjung Museum people to participate in the GLAM project. I can organize locally in their training and act as mediator.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 08:47, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Noopur! I noticed you placed an autobiography tag on Shammi Kapoor. Some editors are wondering what this was made as a result of at Talk:Shammi Kapoor#What is Shammiji's Wikipedia account?. Could you clarify why you placed it and state if you still believe it is necessary? Ryan Vesey 18:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For your contributions on the article of Clothing in India, which was the collaboration of the month under WikiProject India for the month of July 2012. Your work is appreciated. Thanks BPositive (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noopur! I'd love your input on the project I am in the process of starting. Feel free to take a look if you can, and see the talk page for some specific questions I have. Thank you :) SarahStierch (talk) 21:32, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopur,

I added more images from the Crafts Museum. And I like your cat! ;o) Yann (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Hi, I just want to know if there is any procedure in Wikipedia to report a habitual and regular vandal?? if possible,kindly advise me in this( the subject is User talk:Nb20078....thanks--Adamstraw99 (talk) 04:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Hello, i did my hw i guess :P Zenith1997 (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my edit on Rajkot, there is much more in wikipedia than I thought.

• I like electronics it would be great if you could send a list of articles on electronics. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmaiv (talk • contribs) 09:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For your special contribution in Rajkot program and Ahmedabad Program(include competition) Harsh Kothari (Talk/Contribution) 09:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dear This Is Madhura. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.140.227.67 (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dear This is madhura from PAI International learning solutions.

)

14.140.227.67 (talk) 07:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!!! This Priyanka Nag (talk) 07:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC) from the Wikipedia session, Pune.[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Hello....sending a Barnstar!!!! Priyanka Nag (talk) 07:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello noopur rawal i m very much inspired by u i want ji join seriously this session. i m b tech student from ACEM (Harayana) my qus is that is there any session for online applicants also? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.102.46.98 (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Noopur28! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i am Jeevanantham Karunanithi 19:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jeevanatham Karunanithi! Good to see you are editing. Noopur28 (talk)

Thank you :) Check the list of articles created by me in my user page. Jeevanantham Karunanithi (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noopur28, Your constant edits on Nirmal Baba are act of Vandalism. There were special wikipedia Admins invloved in editing this BLP. ALL the consequent edits are with proper references and discussion and and as per BLP guidelines. Please follow the talk and you will find all the proof. Please open a Talk on your concerns. If this act of your continues, it will be reported as Vandalism. Please raise your concerns on talk page before making such reverts.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rastongi (talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Noopur28, sorry that you feel that way. Please point out the specifics of my edits and if they are not approppriate, I shall be open for discussion. Also, every bit of Edit has been brought on talk section of the page and properly discussed. Despite my continuous requests, It is very unfortunate that you did not browse through the edit history. Also, I would like to make a significant note that Wikpedia admins have edited this page from the version you have trying to revert back to with out any valid reason. There on every bit of edit has been scrutinzed before it went into the article. Also, peacock words that you mentioned are being being edited by other editor as well. I hope you will make a note my points.

Thanks for your time. Raj9272 (talk) 02:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopur28, my name is Lord Roem, and I help out with the Arbitration Committee. From your short statement there, it seems you're having a content dispute with another editor. If that's the case, have you tried opening a Request for Comment to gain broader community comments on the issue? If you have, or you're concerned this is just between a few editors, maybe following the instructions in filing a request at the dispute resolution noticeboard will be fruitful.

If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask; just leave a note on my talk page. Best, Lord Roem (talk) 03:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I warned the other editors about this as well - you need to be more precise in how you use the term vandalism on Wikipedia. Rastaogni's edits were not vandalism but an editorial disagreement. You terming them as such in your edit summaries does NOT help things at all. Please read through WP:NOTVAND. Also, your blind revert did get rid of the useful edits I've done. I'm not very pleased that you did that, rather than try to merge the material from your preferred version into the article. I would greatly appreciate you taking the time to remake some of the changes. Honestly, I'm seriously considering reverting back as some of the sections in your preferred version do not belong in the article. I'm hoping you'll consider this. 76.205.1.40 (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse the last part - frustrations from day taking over a bit. The part of vandalism is something I think you need to consider though. Basically, if the other person is making a good-faith effort (from their view) to improve the article, it's not vandalism even if you disagree with the material. Even if they push and push, it's still not vandalism by Wikipedia standards. Calling it such, on Wikipedia, can be considered a personal attack which can draw unwanted attention to you. Here are some of the dispute resolution processes that can help you when you're in a dispute. For this article, the BLP Noticeboard and NPOV Noticeboard will probably be quite helpful. There is already a BLPN post about this article. 76.205.1.40 (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ponty Chadha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Home Ministry and Punjab Police (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Noopur28! Wishing you a very Happy Merry Christmas :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am, if only I had the time, I could have agreed to the offer u gave me... I'm a college boy, with exams :-( ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi....Nice to hear from you...What type of help do u want from me? I would be glad to help you in anyway to the best of my ability. There are a lot of Indian Wikipedians out there. You can refer here [1] for Indians in Wikipedia. Naveed (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to collabrate.. How can I help? Reply on my talk page.. Thanks.. --Nizil (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion here regarding one of your addition to the article. Would you kindly comment there. Thanks! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 13:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports injuries to specific organs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 03:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Noopor, I noticed some pov ips are blanking the sections from above article. i had just reverted the version to the last version edited by you [2] but within three minuted the ip reverted it again.

can we ask for page protection and some admin to look over the page to fight the vandalism and also block this IP permanantly? Jethwarp (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend. Swarupboserkl (talk) 09:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Anti-Doping Agency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Doping

Vijender Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NRI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Instamojo Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountainview (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasuben Pizza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasuben Pizza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jethwarp (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What did you mean by this edit (February 2012)? Nearly every single sentence has references, and the translated verse extracts are also with citation. What does "This article needs additional citations for verification" mean? And what is the original research you saw? Shreevatsa (talk) 19:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LogX (talk • contribs) 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meenakshi Lekhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindu College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For creating the article of Nirmal Baba. That too in March 2012!!!! Thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consider checking Talk:Asaram Bapu first before making changes. The changes you are making were being discussed at talk page simultaneously. --Tito☸Dutta 19:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I edited after reading the discussions there. I don't have an issue with 'rape' as a term. My problem was that the quote on molestation versus rape wasn't attributed so it seemed like 'police' (Delhi or Jodhpur?) first booked him under rape then molestation. I removed the vivid graphic details of touching and caressing because I don't see why they are relevant to the developments in this case. The case is about sexual harassment largely and those details seemed unnecessary. Noopur28 (talk)

• Discuss first. We can't read mind. And what you have said above, you could tell the same thing at the talk page. I personally agree to your edit, but, there was not any consensus there still and we were waiting for Writ's reply. -- Tito☸Dutta 19:13, 2 September 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Be Nice. There is no reason to discuss my edits because I am not disputing what you guys are discussing. I am simply rewriting the information in a more encyclopedic manner. If I feel unsure about why something should stay or go, I will definitely put it up for discussion. Thanks Noopur28 (talk)

• Unnecessary link to be nice essay. Your edits may or may not be disruptive, but, at least the last edit has directly hampered the discussion of the talk page. You neither commented not waited so that we could finish our discussion. In other words, when someone starts making changes which is being discussed, the discussion gets distracted. In case, you have read the recent discussions, Writ was questioned for the edit and his reply is more or less satisfactory. But, the removal has already been done. Thankfully, your edit was over all constructive. --Tito☸Dutta 19:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am tired of dealing with protectionist guardians of Wikipedia. I make edits in good faith and have a coherent logic informing why I write something or remove it. This discussion seems futile and more in the direction of correcting my behavior. I choose to engage the least over talk pages and I also believe that you are exaggerating my "disruptive behavior". Moreover, there is no rule stating that all editors should engage with existing discussions on the article and only then edit.Noopur28 (talk)

• Who has told your edits were disruptive? Those were constructive. The point with which I started: Consider checking Talk:Asaram Bapu first before making changes. The changes you are making were being discussed at talk page simultaneously. Read that I did not say "you must participate in the discussions. But, if you do so, it'll be helpful. --Tito☸Dutta 19:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Refer your comments above: "Discuss first" <-- hardly sounds like a suggestion. I believe it is called an assertive statement. Also, "Your edits may or may not be disruptive, but, at least the last edit has directly hampered the discussion of the talk page" <--ummm WP:WHOCARES. I choose to close this here. Noopur28 (talk)

• An unwanted misunderstanding. Your edit has hampered the discussion (but, the edit was constructive, in other words, for the article it might be fine, but, may not be same for the discussion, one is article and another is talk page). It is expected (and what I suggested) that when editors are discussing an issue, allow them to finish the discussion first. When you make an edit which is being discussed the discussion becomes irrelevant.
  Last line (which was also the first line: Consider checking Talk:Asaram Bapu first before making changes. The changes you are making were being discussed at talk page simultaneously. --Tito☸Dutta 20:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• And just for information, the reaction I expected after giving the suggestions is like this: Yes, I am following and will follow the discussion. And you have also agreed that my edits were constructive. So, there should not be any trouble at this moment. Thanks for pointing to the discussion. [sign], not this unexpected misunderstanding. --Tito☸Dutta 20:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have not read the article. I have not read the talk page of the article as well. But by reading the discussion here, I too think that it is over protection attitude. Writing that I expect following reply ---- is also a kind of instruction. If an action needs to be taken, it should be taken with the rules assuming good faiths. Rationalising the actions with over protective attitude is surely not the solution in my opinion. I may be wrong. Kindly correct me if I am wrong. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Kindly correct me if I am wrong. — I am not going to spend anymore time. Yes, you don't need to read before commenting. Reading is a waste of time. Anyway, enough misunderstanding already. So, let's stop here. --Tito☸Dutta 05:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		A plate of Papad/Papadum for you
		Here is a plate of Papad for you. Papad is a thin, crisp disc-shaped Indian food typically based on a seasoned dough made from black gram (urad flour), fried or cooked with dry heat. Flours made from other sources such as lentils, chickpeas, rice, or potato, can be used. In South India it is called Papadum. Asaram Bapu article has been a headache for me for last one year or so. Unnecessary disputes/misunderstanding isnot expected. Thank you. Tito☸Dutta 20:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KHOJ, international artists' association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malviya Nagar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S. Sreesanth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BCCI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Campa Cola Compound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vina Mazumdar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• organise a meeting to support the recommendations of the Rama Rao Committee on Hindu Law Reform (to expand the inheritance rights of daughters. <ref>{{cite news|last=SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT|title=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Purple Barnstar
		For efforts in the face of toxicity. --Reagle (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopur, I just heard of your work on writing about more women in India. So, I thought I would begin with my mother, Padma Shri receiver, educator, and much more. It was rejected immediately & account blocked. So, then I proceeded unblocking the account & going about contributing a different way.

Would you take a look at this & let me know what I am missing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Geeta_Dharmarajan

I will contribute more if am able & I can.

Many thanks! Tulsid (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sunny Gupta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melody Concerto^talk 05:15, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page Rinku d'das (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hasmukh Patel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEPT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DPS MMS Scandal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ronsblo.blogspot.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 19:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delta Meghwal Rape Case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Delta Meghwal rape case. Since you had some involvement with the Delta Meghwal rape case redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Instamojo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instamojo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Folk dance in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folk dance in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MT Train^Discuss 17:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for making a page on Delta Meghwal Rape Case. Can you please make a page for Nenu Devi Meghwal rape and suicide case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:1385:2B9E:6540:7952:C0E5:5A6B (talk) 07:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article DPS MMS scandal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No lasting significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Systems and Infrastructures

ExLibris420 (talk) 19:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good cat. <3 Amstyles2022 (talk) 19:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Amanda :D Noopur28 (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Faculty for Justice in Palestine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Clearfrienda ^💬 23:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Hi Noopur28, you may well already be aware of this, or most of this; I'll shortly reply to your protection-lowering request at WP:RFPP which made me provide this information. Feel free to simply remove this message.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noopur28. Thank you for your work on UAW Local 4811. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noopur28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faculty for Justice in Palestine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]