User talk:Pakelectrical

My name is Pakelectrical(full Pakelectrical engineer)

Dear Sir:

|} |}

The

Adventure

Hi Pakelectrical!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pakelectrical,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged We.R.play for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Atomic Game Engine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no notability demonstrated

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Atomic Game Engine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Atomic Game Engine, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Peppy Paneer (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pakelectrical! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:04, Monday, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Portal:Pakistani Technologies, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 12:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Portal:Pakistani Technologies. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 12:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Portal:Pakistani Technologies, you may be blocked from editing. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is your only purpose here to write promotional content? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pakelectrical,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mobile frachises of Pakistan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LavaBaron (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You cannot claim "all right reserved" (for yourself or others) for work done at Mobile franchises of Pakistan‎ on Talk:Mobile franchises of Pakistan‎. All contributions to Wikipedia are released under CC BY-SA. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mobile franchises of Pakistan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mobile franchises of Pakistan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Likes engineers more than Scientists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 10:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 10:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note you have been blocked for spamming, advertising, creating useless categories (and treating them like your personal home pages), and generally editing like Wikipedia is your personal platform to promote your pet topics. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Science and Technology in Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pakistan-Technology-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pakelectrical ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

1. Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
2. Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
3. The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
4. There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits at Spike1478: You're not an admin and, therefore, cannot accept unblock requests. Please allow administrators to handle requests like this. only (talk) 14:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know what you thought you would achieve by that, but the effect of what you did was to remove the unblock request from the list of unblock requests which are on on hold. If Only had not seen what you did and reverted it, that could have meant that no administrator would ever have seen that the request was still pending, and so no administrator would ever have come back and dealt with the request. That means that what you did could well have prevented the editor from ever getting unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Shahzad Town, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. In addition, please maintain a neutral tone of voice as required per our Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Pakelectrical. Thank you so much for joining the Editor Retention project and the Editor of the Week program. As time goes on I'll share a little of the history of the project and the program and we can discuss the importance of "pats on the back". Briefly, Administrator @Dennis Brown: started WER in January of 2013, @Go Phightins!: and I joined soon after and the Editor of the Week award followed soon after that. The project has hit a bit of a lull right now but the Editor of the Week Award is still a major tool in retaining editors. Sometime on Sunday next I'll give out the next award. Who it is will show up on the Project page and the Editor of the Week page. Then, one of the simplest ways of working toward retaining an editor happens; various editors stop by and offer congratulations. Some are editors that know the awardee, but some are strangers. I hope you will take a minute to join in on the "Patting of the Back" ceremony. Anyway, Welcome Aboard. Buster Seven Talk 13:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding my welcome as well ... thanks for joining us! And to echo Buster, thanking EotW recipients is a great way to get started. Go Phightins! 03:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Science and Technology in Pakistan stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your work at Portal:Pakistan and Portal:Technology in Pakistan often shows up in my recent changes patrol - it all looks good! But I've just undone a couple of your edits, since Portal:Pakistan is not a "featured portal", since it hasn't passed an independent review. The process for gaining that status is described at Portal:Featured portals. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Voice over IP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Processor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from We.R.Play. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The company's own press kit is an inherently unreliable source. Largoplazo (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see this is far from the first time you've been warned about the improper removal of maintenance or deletion tags. Largoplazo (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From http://press.werplay.com/

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:We.R.play Official Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 22:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grammar School Dubai Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rivo Mobile Official Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I appreciate you all Admins towards improving Wikipedia, I am really sorry but I did not knew about this copyright rule, I thought this was apply to only images, Please forgive me, I will try my best that this problem does not comes again. Please Apologies me.
kindest Regards;
Pakelectrical Pakelectrical (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not the only issue that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am sorry Yamla but as an editor I am trying to improve myself and I do not know all wikipedia rules, I am Sorry. Those Unfree images used to had their articles but they all got deleted.
Kindest Regards;
Pakelectrical 27^th March.

unblock | 1=I appreciate you all Admins towards improving Wikipedia, I am really sorry but I did not knew about this copyright rule, I thought this was apply to only images, Please forgive me, I will try my best that this problem does not comes again. Please Apologies me.
kindest Regards;
Pakelectrical PakelectricalPakelectrical (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is exactly, word for word, the same unblock request which was just denied. Please do not abuse the unblock process in this manner. I've told you copyright issues were not the only concern with your edits. You are welcome to make another unblock request, but you must address the other concerns with your edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #15871 was submitted on May 31, 2016 11:52:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dear, We intends to arrange Wikipedia awareness workshops in Pakistan, search in Facebook Sindhi Wikipedia page and see the details of the event or contact me at email jogiasad.sdwiki(at)gmail.com.

We need cooperation from Pakistani Wikipedians, Wikimedians of Pakistan, to get more users for our mother lanuages Wikipedias, Urdu Wikipedia, Punjabi wiki, Sindhi wiki, Kashmiri wiki, Pashto wiki etc. Come join us, we also intends to activate Wikimedia Pakistan chapter. Thanks, expecting you to contact us...Jogi 007 (talk) 06:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17661 was submitted on Mar 02, 2017 17:57:02. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17669 was submitted on Mar 03, 2017 10:44:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17958 was submitted on Apr 04, 2017 08:26:46. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are cordially invited to one day workshop "Wikipedia & Sindhi Wikipedia awareness workshop and meetup in Karachi", starting in May 2017, you may contact JogiAsad....سنڌي وڪيپيڊيا (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Technology in Pakistan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Technology in Pakistan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Technology in Pakistan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 21:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pakelectrical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello to you. It's been a few years. I grew up, and now I want to come back and work here according to all the rules. I of course undertake to avoid copyright problems and to work here only according to the accepted rules. I know that it is not allowed to open another user. That's why I'm asking here, give me a chance.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

someone???? Pakelectrical (talk) 11:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]