User talk:Potapych

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

HURDAT has been updated with the new information for the 1921 to 1925 Atlantic hurricane seasons, several storms have been added and one was upgraded to a Cat:5. Could you update/make the tracks for those seasons, thanks. (link for updated HURDAT) Cyclonebiskit 22:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"One consequence is this really odd date format that can't be customized to one's browser." Could you explain which format you mean? Tony (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The best tracks for the SHem (2007-08), NIO (2008), and WPac (2008), are available here. I'm not sure if there's going to be an issue since they're not in HURDAT format but could you update the tracks? :) Thanks, Cyclonebiskit 14:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are making a table for the season, but I already added in the infoboxes.--Yue ^{of the North} 16:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They look quite good, can I copy them for the other basins and seasons? --Yue ^{of the North} 00:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you see my user page, you will see that I started the table for the Australian region, it is the same, but for the Australian region, can you add in a parameter for the Storm Images because you can find them in the GOES archives?--Yue ^{of the North} 01:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant like this:

Storm name	JTWC number	Active dates	Storm classification at peak intensity	Max. winds (mph)	Min. pressure (hPa)	Storm track map	Storm Image
Lindsay	01S	July 9 – July 13	Category 1 tropical cyclone (BoM)	45 (10-minute)	990
			Tropical storm (SSHS)

--Yue ^{of the North} 02:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

any for the storms that didn't have images on my user page, it was because I did not add them in. --Yue ^{of the North} 02:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like the table that has been done for the AUS 96 Season. Though i have some concerns - BoM Perth will have reports on the TCs in their AOR so are we going to write a summuary on them and include the infobox or wat. Also having done a quick search ive discovered that Harold is a Category 2 Cyclone by BoM. Also is this how we are going to do any season before Nadi became an RSMC as it looks good. Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your idea sounds good so im happy to support it, however i will leave it up to you to code it in as i do not really know how to do that - im currently planning to try and get some of the SPAC seasons up to at least C-Class (if not GA) once the current season has offically ended. Also nice work with the trackmap updating you did recently - is that it now or are their more too come Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From Irdicent:

Can you make track maps for the IMD storms that the JTWC did not warn on, I copied the IMD data into pictures and saved them and webcited them, here they are:

• BOB 02
• ARB 01
• BOB 03
• ARB 02
• BOB 08

Irdicent 23 21:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ive noticed a bug with it. Cyclone Gabrielle has been downgraded to a Tropical low by BoM and has the same windspeeds but the infobox is cutting off the JTWC data when i add in Type =. Would you be able to find a solution to this? Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

err scratch that Cyclonebiskit has managed to find a solution using Type1= Thanks anyway Jason Rees (talk) 00:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Potapych. I replied on my talk page, because I prefer to keep discussions in one location. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 11:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a track map for Tropical Depression Hilary of 1967, here is the data.

• EP0967 HILARY 081000 1967 17.5 110.6 30 0 -99 -99 -99 -99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
• EP0967 HILARY 081006 1967 17.7 111.7 30 0 -99 -99 -99 -99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
• EP0967 HILARY 081012 1967 18.2 112.8 30 0 -99 -99 -99 -99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
• EP0967 HILARY 081018 1967 19.0 114.0 30 0 -99 -99 -99 -99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
• EP0967 HILARY 081100 1967 19.8 114.8 30 0 -99 -99 -99 -99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *

• Note:User:Ramisses already make the file, but it stopped working.

Irdicent 23 14:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From the HPC link that was on the project talk, I found tracking data for the tropical depressions 1965-69. Can you make track maps out of them? the headers are the tropical depression number and the year (ex. Twenty-Two 66)

Irdicent 23 14:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hid them, but how do you make it into HURDAT format? (sorry) ----Irdicent 23 15:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an e-mail to the ones most involved in the EPAC HURDAT track book, which comes out soon. The one who responded mentioned that you caught an error which they had not noticed, relating to a conversion error from the TCR to HURDAT. =) I e-mailed them about Kika as well, just in case it isn't a CPHC/JTWC delay like what was seen during Ioke a few years ago. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've downloaded Mac Ports but now I'm lost. (I'm incapable of doing this kind of technical stuff on my own) Can you tell me step by step exactly what I'm supposed to do and how to do it? Sorry if this is a pain but I really want to get this program running and help out :) Thanks, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've recently gotten the track map program up and running and I have two questions about it for you. I've seen in your maps, that you're able to get the Extratropical points in the map, I'm unable to do that for some reason. Is there something I need to do for that to work? The second thing is how do I make tracks for southern hemisphere storms? Thanks, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does it make it more confusing that I'm putting into the official data? All the JTWC is unofficial and therefore shouldn't be used as the main intensity. If need be, we should restart that discussion if you want to continue to hold your ground with the JTWC. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the middle of rewriting that article. Please, don't badger me about my edits unless they are obviously incorrect. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Welcome back - Just wondering what was the error you found in the Infobox Hurricane Small?.Jason Rees (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you around again! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i can understand why you think it is annoying. Anyway can you see why when i tried to add conversions for hpa to inches it didnt work? thanks.Jason Rees (talk) 22:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Post-2009 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons. Since you had some involvement with the Post-2009 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Post–2010 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons. Since you had some involvement with the Post–2010 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyclone Hamish (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone Hamish (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 07:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]