User talk:Ritwikbmca

Archives

Archive 1

{{helpme}} Can Charter airlines be included in airports destinations list as a seperate section? never stop flying (talk) 01:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may add any facts you like, as long as you supply an appropriate reliable source for the fact, for example a newspaper/book that states it is a specific destination. In that case, sure, go for it.  Chzz  ►  01:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>  He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref> 

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References == {{reflist}} 

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Ritwikbmca/reftest and try it out.

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009.  </ref>   Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>  

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation  | last = Smith  | first = John  | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century  | publication-date = 2001  | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]  | page = 125  | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref> 

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Look at other airport articles.....carriers do not need to be linked twice as it is already linked onced. Snoozlepet (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

If an airline carrier is listed twice in an airport destination list (as in Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport) should it be wiki linked twice or just only once inside airport-dest-list? never stop flying (talk) 02:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the helpme template and not adminhelp unless your question actually requires administrator intervention. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Repeating links is fine in that circumstance as per WP:REPEATLINK.from what I can tell, anyway. TheRasIsBack! 03:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Agreed. (marking -helped, strikethrough partial section title). --Lexein (talk) 04:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that while the guideline that you have been pointing to is certainly valid, there is a whole set of other guidelines governing all aviation and airline articles and these have been established by longstanding editor consensus. All related articles follow said consensus, without exception. The Calcutta Airport article cannot be the some exception, just because. If you feel there is a different way of doing things, by all means feel welcome to discuss it at the appropriate forum, obtain consensus, and then go ahead and make the change (across the board, and not just in select, "pet" articles). To that end, I am reverting the multiple linking of airlines you have recently re-instated (its very purpose is to avoid a pointless sea of blue. A quick glance at your edit history shows you haven't ventured too far from Bengal-related articles, so you may not be aware of this. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Kolkata, India

(view · edit · changes)

Thanks for uploading File:Etvbangla.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article IHP Airpistol 0.177 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable orphaned article, not clear how this might meet notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 01:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Airteldth1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 21:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airtellivescrn.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SCktHD.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Etv-bangla-news2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Etv-bangla-news1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kalibanerjee bangla.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aadmin mbm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MBMCU PLACEMENTS PIE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airportbusindigo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airportbusindigo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of HD channels in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Company channel lineups are not encyclopdic. Fails WP:NOTDIR. See AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List_of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels on Sky, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd bundle of channel lineups, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd bundle of channel lineups.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Banerjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vidyasagar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:User Computer Science. Since you had some involvement with the Template:User Computer Science redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CUMBM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CCUtarmac.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:MBMCU-Classroom.JPG
• File:MBMupstairs.JPG

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of HD channels in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No evidence (references) supporting that the topic passes WP:NLIST

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 1292simon (talk) 23:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Airteldthhome.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused and low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]