User talk:Thomediter

Hi Thomediter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, Thomediter! Thank you for your contributions. I am Beeblebrox and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Denmark Series

added links pointing to AaB and GVI

Denmark Series 2016-17

added a link pointing to GVI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomediter: Greetings, I'm Exemplo347. I have just moved an article you created, OGAE Poll 2017, to Draft:OGAE Poll 2017. The reason I have done this is to enable you to work on it, without it being nominated for deletion as a test page. When you have finished, please submit it for review through the Articles for Creation process. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OGAE Poll 2017, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomediter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OGAE Poll 2017".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 15:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:A game cover for an upcoming game called AO Tennis that is developed and published by Big Ant Studios.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please add your source(s) to Lystrup IF? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I explained in my edit summary why I removed that information. We do not include lists of players, tournaments or arenas on video game articles. WP:GAMECRUFT explains this. This is an encyclopedia written for a general reader, not a game guide or a manual or an indiscriminate collection of information. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But why don't you do that, how does is hurt? I have sources, so why is it a problem, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomediter (talk • contribs)

It has nothing to do with sources. The content is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia has guidelines on what we include in articles and the overwhelming is to not include stuff like this. If you check other well-written video game articles, you will not see lists of levels, characters, weapons and other in-game items/concepts there. These things are not important to the general reader. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of tennis video games wikipedias have that information, it's just it's not an opinion to have included, it's for information, which a genereal reader, would like to know. --thomediter (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?. Why are you so mean to me. I did what you said, and again you added notability, to my page. Why???? --thomediter (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating AO Tennis, Thomediter!

Wikipedia editor Lee Vilenski just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Article may not meet WP:GNG, because WP:CRYSTALBALL may be in effect.

To reply, leave a comment on Lee Vilenski's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Lee Vilenski(talk) 20:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of licensed players and tournaments in AO Tennis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of licensed players and tournaments in AO Tennis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The1337gamer (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you wrote a message saying that you wanted to leave wikipedia because nobody tells you why they reverted your edits or scheduled your article for deletion so I thought I might point you towards WP:CRYSTAL ^{[Username Needed]} 14:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm Serge, and Admin here at Wikipedia. I saw your edit where you expressed confusion and frustration on why your content and articles keep getting deleted from Wikipedia. I apologize for the bad experience. However, there is a bit of a learning curve with editing Wikipedia. It's not just like blogging or messageboards like Gamefaqs where you can write whatever you want. There are a lot of policies and guidelines to consider. It's often good to start slow when starting to edit.

1. As to why the list of characters/players/teams keeps getting removed from articles - please read WP:GAMECRUFT. The short version is, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a game guide website. Wikipedia documents things from more of a historical perspective, documenting things like development history, how it was reviewed by critics, and a brief explanation of what sort of gameplay it has. It's not a gameguide that lists out all the characters, game options, weapons, tournaments, etc. It's just fundamentally not what we do here. If that's what you aim to write about, that's fine, but it's better added to fan wikias or places like Gamefaqs.

1. As to why your articles may have been deleted, please read this essay, where I try to break it down for newcomers.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me

It's not worth my time, if a silly rule about player list being irrelevant, when they clearly are one of the most important things in Tennis video games, so I don't want spend time on that dumb thing. Delete the articles if you want. --thomediter (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just a "silly rule", its some of the very foundations of how to write Wikipedia articles. We don't need to argue any further if you're dropping this particular issue, but if you decide to keep editing Wikipedia, I strongly recommend that you to take the time to learn these basic concepts. Otherwise, you'll see that you'll just continue to have your articles deleted and your content removed. Sergecross73 msg me 22:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's disagree, it is a strange silly rule, that dosen't make sense. Player lists is very important information for tennis video games. --thomediter (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Try thinking of it this way: Let's say you wanted to order a pizza from a place like Pizza Hut or Little Cesars. Wouldn't it be useful to have a list of locations and addresses on their Wikipedia articles? Or a menu for toppings and prices? Or a list of phone numbers to call for delivery? Of course it would. But do you see that on any of their articles? No. Why is that? Because of our policy of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Lists like that are outside of the scope of what an encyclopedia covers. It's fundamentally not what they do. Just because something is useful, does not mean it belongs in an article. Player lists fall into the same situation. Sergecross73 msg me 17:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Almost every single tennis wikipedia page had a list of players, until an user deleted it of almost every tennis video game wikpedia. I still think it's important enough to be on wikipedia. --thomediter (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but just because it was there, doesn't make it right. A user rightfully deleted it because it violated policy and guidelines. While you're free to start discussions to change them or create "exceptions", if you're going to repeat subjective claims of "its important" and ""its useful" over and over again, you're not going to convince anyone. Which leads me back to my earlier point - you'd be better off if you either tried to learn the basics of what's appropriate on Wikiedia, or move on to a website that allows for this sort of content. How're you're currently acting isn't going to work out. Sergecross73 msg me 18:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I really want the lists, because I really think they are relevant, and it seems I am not changing my opinion about that --thomediter (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AO Tennis (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AO Tennis (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please do not reverse the edits i made. Users only update those facts, when tournaments are finished. Thanks. Kleyw (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But always when a player reach a final Most Tournaments Finals gets updated, dosen't that rule count for the others?

We update players as the tournament advance. But not points or money stats. Only is updated, when the tournaments are finished.Kleyw (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

happy belated new years, maybe we can work on together Eliskuya2 (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Thomediter, thanks for creating 2018 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters – Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references for the information you have added so far.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thomediter (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to look into it. Thanks, thomediter (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2017 French Open into 2018 French Open. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :). First I wanna apologize for copying without giving contribution, I wasn't sure how I should do it or if it was required when a lot dag was changed. But I understand now, and I know what to do when I copy in the future. I see you added the contribution to the site, so I would like to know if there is anything that I then should do now. And Thanks for telling me :) thomediter (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving it and take part in the discussion on the talk page. Spike 'em (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that you shouldn't be making null edits (or close to null) such as these ([1], [2]) to continue a discussion. If you have a point to make, you should put it on the article talk page, not in edit summaries. – PeeJay 07:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Financial Fair Play Regulations, you may be blocked from editing. William Avery (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There are many sources that say Setién is coming to the end of his time at Barcelona. There is nothing that I can find on FCB's website or social media that says he has gone. He is still listed as coach on the website.

The English Wikipedia relies on reliable published sources that verify the facts, particularly facts about living people. If you can supply a source published by FCB that states clearly that Setién has left the club, please add it to the article. Without such a source, Wikipedia can't claim he has. Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ 23:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Australian Open – Women's singles final, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Australian Open – Women's singles final until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Opinion polling for the 2021 Danish local elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 04:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean I needed sources. I had one for each pollingthomediter 04:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomediter. Thank you for your work on 2021 Ringkøbing-Skjern Municipal election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. Hopefully you will write more in the future!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomediter. Thank you for your work on 2021 Silkeborg municipal election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I sincerely hope that you will write more articles in the future! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Module:Political party/R, you may be blocked from editing. Either the colour-code remains the official colour, or you remove it from the party infobox! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomediter,

Please stop your cut and paste edits. If you disagree with an article of yours being moved to Draft space, please move the original article back to main space. Do not create a second version of the article. This is considered disruptive. It's fine if you object to a draftification but please stick to working with the article you originally created. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Thanks guys I am still learning. Yusrashafiqjutt (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2021 Horsens Municipal election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I restored the orange that used to be used on the module for the colour, while acknowledging the turquoise as the customary colour. In addition, you edit makes it so that the colour doesn't match the graph image for the next election. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I reverted your reversion of the Christian Democrats as the party used to be orange and the colour is used on diagrams, graphs and images prior to 2022. See previous elections. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add, the image and maps used orange for "Christian Democrats" before 2022. See previous election pages. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes are deeply unhelpful and controversial, hence why they have been reverted. When changes you make are reverted, you are expected to gain consensus for them via a discussion, not try and force them back in via edit warring. If you continue to do this, I will be requesting you are blocked from editing the modules. Number 57 19:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I discuss this Thomediter (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The party colors needs to be improved Thomediter (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your comments on the main module talk page. Number 57 19:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you :) I've answered some things and have a few questions, so I hope you will return to me :) Thomediter (talk) 19:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thomediter reported by User:IceWelder (Result: ). Thank you. IceWelder [✉] 13:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We may not be in agreement on a few things at the moment, but I would still welcome you to join our WikiProject to work together moving forward. Grk1011 (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for that :) It's nice that we can keep it friendly despite not having complete agreements :) Thomediter (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022–23 UEFA Champions League into Draft:2024–25 UEFA Europa League. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, if you don't stop changing the module without gaining consensus, either I'll be requesting you're blocked, or the template will be locked to prevent you editing it. Stop it. Number 57 20:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you have added to WT:E&R is far too detailed and isn't going to encourage contributions. Can I suggest a huge simplification and changing it to an WP:RfC with the simple question: "How should party colours on Wikipedia be determined" – by the dominant colour of their logo or by usage in the media. Number 57 10:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will re-write it then Thomediter (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea what you are doing with this, but when I said start an RfC, this is what you should have done. This is how RfCs work. Number 57 10:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you want it to be a discussion just about Green–Left / Red–Green alliance rather than a wider question about all parties? Number 57 10:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in chancing the color of those 2 parties because I like spending my times on Danish election articles, but feel frustrated to see the wrong colors. There are too many parties on wikipedia who don't use their logo color for us to say that "logo colors are a rule". I'm not super interested in the wider question, as I'm mostly interested in dealing with the parties I find interesting myself, and hope that I can be allowed to change the 2 colors.

I've recived agreements for Red-Green Alliance, and I therefore I think I should be allowed to change that color.

Cheers, thomediter. Thomediter (talk) 10:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For me I can agree to go with the now improved with arguments third opinion on Green Left if you can agree to go with the third and fourth opinion on Red-Green Alliance. I can live with saying that we keep Green Left as it is, but change Red-Green Alliance to orange. I don't know if this may sound like a compromise and has no place on wikipedia, but to be honest I don't think so. Mulitple parties have their colors on media association and not one of their logo's association, so to have Red-Green Alliance on orange is fine. We've recieved opinions on both our cases, and I can agree to conclude that can you've won consensus on Green Left, if you can agree that I won consensus on Red-Green Alliance.

I hope this will be okay with you, as I don't want to still keep these discussions.

Cheers, thomediter Thomediter (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folketing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonalignment. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomediter. Thank you for your work on Slagelse (Nomination district). User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

You should consider creating a navigation template for all these nomination districts.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Venstre (Denmark) light color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Aalborg municipal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hals.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision News Desk Shortcut WP:ESC/N Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag . Content and design updates are taking place daily. The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week. To receive a daily or weekly Eurovision news update please click on the appropriate button. Cordially, News Desk Editor-in-Chief Ktkvtsh (talk)

Eurovision Daily News Update 16 August 2023 Happy birthday to... Marc Moulin who would be 81 today. He represented Belgium 1980 as part of Telex, placing (17th) Happy birthday to... Jari Sillanpää who is 58 today. He represented Finland 2004 placing (14th in the Semi Final) Recently in the news... Patricia Bredin, the first representative to Eurovision from the United Kingdom, has died aged 88. Recently in the news... EasyJet is launching a new route from the United Kingdom to the Icelandic city of Akureyri, near Húsavík. Did you know... The largest number of nations to take part was 43 in 2008, 2011 and 2018. Eurovision entrant... Dave Benton (born 31 January 1951, birth name Efrén Eugene Benita) is a pop musician from Aruba who lives in Estonia. He is one of the winners of the Eurovision Song Contest 2001. At the age of 50 years and 101 days at the time of his victory, Benton is the oldest singer ever to win Eurovision, as well as the first Black winner. Born Efrén Eugene Benita in 1951 on the Caribbean island of Aruba, he was fluent in English, Dutch, Spanish and Papiamento, the creole language of the island. As a drummer and a backing vocalist, he worked with The Drifters, Tom Jones, Billy Ocean, José Feliciano and The Platters. Benton's daughter Sissi participated in Eesti Laul in 2021 with the song "Time", attempting to follow in her father's footsteps and represent Estonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021. She qualified to the superfinal, where she placed second.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 49 ← Headlines Loreen won the 2023 Eurovision Song Contest in Liverpool. Eurovision Choir canceled indefinitely. Junior Eurovision 2023 to be in Nice, France.
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles	Unassessed articles	Good articles	A-class articles	Featured articles	Number of members
7263	0	171	0	4	105
• HOME • TALK • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 50 ← Headlines Three countries announce representative. Junior Eurovision 2023 won by France.
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles	Unassessed articles	Good articles	A-class articles	Featured articles	Number of members
7263	0	178	0	4	108
• HOME • TALK • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I moved back the page considering all other pages are under “Czech Republic”. If you wish to change the present consensus I invite you to open a discussion. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me here :)

I understand your move back, and decided to try and re-open the general discussion surrounding the page name of Czech Republic instead.

Have a nice day :) Thomediter (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I’ll join you there :) Have a great evening! ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, nevermind, I just noticed you referred to all Czechia-related pages, on which I find very hard a different consensus can be reached; I was only focusing on the Eurovision pages, since there may be good arguments to move those specifically. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to TopSpin 2K25. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 00:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Knight of Fortune has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. asilvering (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Dario Faini, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Esc-nq, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- At least three editors, including myself, have reverted the links you had been adding to the participation sections of Eurovision articles. It appears to be an WP:EASTER issue, but also if you want to make a large change to dozens of articles, you should really discuss it first at WT:ESC. Grk1011 (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to TopSpin 2K25. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thomediter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Top Spin 2K25 for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Top Spin 2K25 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah apologies for this, I wanted to create a draft link to the draft page, and screwed up. I'm currently trying to figure out how do it properly like Eurovision Song Contest 2025, but haven't learned how yet. Thomediter (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just figured out it was a spacing issue, whoosh, my bad. Can I do anything to speed up the deletion of my mistakenly created page? Thomediter (talk) 11:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TopSpin 2K25, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wimbledon and Indian Wells.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thomediter. Thank you for your work on Knight of Fortune. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Needs more content. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Danish Social Liberal Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Next United Kingdom general election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stifle (talk) 15:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, if you are adding information about the election date, you need to cite your source in the normal way (not by vaguely pointing at media outlets in edit summary). Stifle (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Christian Democrats (Denmark) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Liberal Alliance (Denmark) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/Schleswig Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to TopSpin 2K25, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 51 ← Headlines Nemo wins for Switzerland. Junior Eurovision 2024 will be hosted in Madrid..
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles	Unassessed articles	Good articles	Featured articles	Number of members
8,668	0	199	4	116
• HOME • TALK • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:2024–25 UEFA Champions League, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KyleRGiggs (talk) 16:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thomediter! I noticed that you are still reverting edits on Eurovision Song Contest 2025, but not engaging in the talk page discussion you started. Of course you are not obliged to as Wikipedia is completely voluntary, but it seems like you are in the minority in your stance, and several people are awaiting your response. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :)

You have a point, and I've now started a vote, to get a proper picture and see if there is a clear consensus, or we are very split.

Have a nice evening :) Thomediter (talk) 22:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit, note that in the parenthetical disambiguation, no need to capitalize (nomination district). I fixed. Dicklyon (talk) 15:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]