User talk:Urban Versis 32

Welcome to my user talk page! I won't bother to archive or delete anything from the page (for now), so it's all here.

Message me for anything including but not limited to:

• Messages and updates regarding status of pages I've created or contributed to
• A userbox or signature request
• Questions about AfC submissions / pending changes reviews I've made
• Anything in general!

I'll try to get back to any messages or requests posted on my user talk page in less than 48 hours.

Hi Urban Versis 32! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samsung SVI Format, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sony NWZ-E383, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, SVI (file format), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I will check the information and add more sources, thank you for the feedback! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:SVI (file format), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urban Versis 32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samsung SVI Format".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urban Versis 32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sony NWZ-E383".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was the aircraft ever constructed? if so how many were built? when was its test flight? All this information would assist in having amore complete article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will try to improve my article! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating an article on the Do 417. I'll be checking my university's library for more sources to expand the article. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found a source and have expanded the article. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 02:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good to know who designed the originals, since Hewlett & Blondeau were not designers. But the real reason I'm leaving the note is that one of the references you gave is a site devoted to copyright violation, and so not acceptable. it would have been better to cite the book that it rips off. I have this at home (I edit from a public library) & will try to remeber to bring it along next time.TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Urban Versis 32! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delete my user Sandbox, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,804 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply at Teahouse about referencing election results was wrong. David notMD (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aereon VectoRotor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject, cancelled, not-built project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sony NWZ-E383, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dornier Do 235 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable aircraft, apparently a proposed design that was never built. Single source is just an SPS with extremely limited information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilCat (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dornier Do 235 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dornier Do 235 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilCat (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for saving my article from being deleted Sides-Daren? (talk) 16:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 01:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 01:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kamov AK, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for adding to my Kennametal edit. Gregwire13 (talk) 03:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 03:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I know that the Guild of Copy Editors will give you a fancier barnstar anyway, but I think you deserve this barnstar now for copyediting that 38k word article. Zippybonzo | talk 16:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your contributions to the April GOCE blitz. I'm going to review some of your copy-edits and provide feedback; please receive this constructively.

Some of the things I'm noting are referred to in Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS). This is our house style guide, which is specialized for the needs of an international online encyclopedia and may differ from the styles you're used to. Copy editors should be better informed of the MOS than the average Wikipedia editor. That doesn't mean you have to memorize it, just be aware of it and refer to it as needed.

• from January 14, 2011, to June 29, 2012. You removed the underlined comma. We actually need this comma because with month-day-year dates, the year is a parenthetical. See MOS:DATECOMMA. On the other hand, with from September 7, to December 14, 2012 the underlined comma should be removed. bigger issue next bullet
• There is a mix of date formats in the article (mdy and dmy). Copy editors should apply one style consistently throughout the article. There is a template at the top of the article's wikicode, {{use dmy dates}}. Assuming that was applied correctly, the dates should be changed to dmy format. The nice thing about dmy dates is that you don't have to worry about those commas.
• Note that the titles of major works of art (TV shows, films, music albums, books, plays, major paintings and statues) are styled in italics. The titles of minor works of art (TV episodes, skits, songs, book chapters, minor paintings and statues) are styled in double quotes. (See MOS:MAJORWORKS)
• The plot summaries for the seasons one and two describe what is happening within the context of the series, which is how plot summaries are generally handled. The third season describes it from outside of narrative (referring to "season 3" and "the story") which is a bit jarring. These should be consistent.
• I did a fair amount of additional copyediting and cleanup which you can see in this diff.

Will add more as I get to other articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me to be a better copy editor! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There may be some notability issues with this article so I'm not sure it's worth putting a lot of effort into it (as articles on non-notable subjects may be deleted).

Longer articles tend to be more complex and face more issues for copy-editors. In addition, the size of the article can pose problems for maintaining the level of concentration to take note of fine distinctions and apply consistent style. I generally discourage newer copy editors from working on long articles, but let's see how you did.

• This list article is arranged like a glossary. If I felt the article was notable and worthwhile, I might apply MOS:GLOSS to it, which is a bit of work. I wouldn't consider this a must-do for copyediting, however.
• As I mentioned above, there are special stylings for titles of major and minor works of art. A segment or sketch is a fairly minor work of art, and would be styled with double quotes (or perhaps single quotes) rather than italics (MOS:MAJORWORKS). So It is a special segment that has a similar concept to I Object, Your Honor should be: It is a special segment that has a similar concept to "I Object, Your Honor". (This differentiates from the major work, Eat Bulaga!, which is styled in italics.) These styles should be applied consistently throughout the list article.
• This list article is very, very long. The maximum recommended article size is 10,000 words (WP:LENGTH), and this is more than three times that. Frankly, its bloated and possibly full of trivia. The list entries which are uncited may be removed as trivia, though you might get pushback from the article's authors for doing so. It might be better to mark these with {{citation needed}} or {{trivia-inline}}. That is optional but not a bad idea if you are making a thorough check of a problematic article. What I would expect you to do as a copy-editor is to make the language as concise as possible. A few examples:
  • It is a special segment that has a similar concept to I Object, Your Honor and I Object #NasaanAngHustisya?, that tests the cleverness and originality of the Eat Bulaga! hosts. The hosts are divided into two teams. In each round, both teams are given one specific object. Each group will take turns thinking of and acting out a clever use for that object by realizing what other objects it might resemble. For instance, a closed umbrella roughly resembles a sword or a walking cane. The team must then act out its new function. At the end of each round, the judges decide which team had the cleverest ideas. The only difference between ACTually and I Object is the theme and the setting, and that both teams must now require to mention the use and function of the object. → The hosts are divided into two teams and given an object to improvise a scene, which is judged on cleverness. It differs from "I Object" as the use and function of the object must be mentioned.‹The template Fake citation needed is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}
  • It is a Facebook promo for the entire month of August 2019 that is part of the 40th-anniversary celebration of Eat Bulaga!. Certain requirements will be met during the show. Participants watching on television must comment on the correct answer, along with a code that will be given by the program, on the designated Facebook post from the official Facebook page of Eat Bulaga! under a certain time limit. A total of 40 participants will be chosen, for the entire month of August 2019. 3 winners will be chosen, who will each win a monthly allowance of ten thousand pesos for one year. → An August 2019 viewer contest with three top prizes of 120,000 pesos.‹The template Fake citation needed is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}
  • After appearing as a three-year-old contestant in the segment Little Miss Philippines in 1987, Aiza Seguerra became a child wonder and subsequently joined the show to become the youngest host at that time.^[2] She received her own segment, Aiza's Kiddie Korner, to feature her funny antics and comic sketches with her co-hosts, and to headline her charisma and many talents, including her famous "duck walk" dance.^[3] Later, this segment was renamed Kiddie Korner together with Lady Lee. → A showcase for the talents of Aiza Seguerra,^[3] the youngest host at the time, who had previously appeared in "Little Miss Philippines" in 1987 at age 3.^[2]
  • It is a segment where the hosts of the Juan for All, All for Juan: Bayanihan of d'Pipol segment search for a sari-sari store that sells multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products on a certain barangay. The spotted sari-sari store will win a cash prize and gift packs from Alaska. The segment is sponsored by the milk brand Alaska. → A segment in the "Juan for All" theme, where the hosts search a particular neighbourhood for a sari-sari store which carries the line of their sponsor's products; the first store found receives a cash prize and merchandise from the sponsor.
• Like other proper names, brand names and companies are styled with word capitalization but not italics. multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products → multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products
• ATM with the BAE'S is a segment of Eat Bulaga! that aired since Sept 2015 - Jan 2016. Alden Richards and Sam Y.G are the Hosts of this EB! segment Acronyms should be defined on first use (MOS:ACRO). If you can't determine its meaning, tag it with {{expand acronym}}.
• 5 contestants are chosen from the studio audience In general use, numbers from 0–9 should be spelled out (though there are exceptions such as dates). It's particularly expected for such a number to be spelled out when it is at the beginning of a sentence (MOS:SPELL09).
• when the Music Stops to pick a BAE, so that they could join Jackpot Round that they called ATM Ang Tenga Mo!. All the contestants are willing to answer the Questions that they prepared in the Jackpot Round looks like a lot of overcapitalization (MOS:CAPS)

You made some good edits, but I don't feel it was nearly thorough enough to count as a completed copyedit. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• It appears that you addressed the {{lead too short}} tag by moving the article's History section up into the lead. This is not a good editing practice. The lead should summarize the body of the article, and generally there shouldn't be anything in the lead which isn't also in the body of the article. (see WP:Lead dos and don'ts, MOS:LEAD.) A better edit would have been to retain the History section and summarize the key points of the History section and the other sections in the lead.
• A quotation was styled in italics; it should be styled in double quotation marks. (MOS:QUOTE)
• The court and government asked them to pay for 3 crore property damages. You removed the word crore, which is part of the Indian numeric system. What we should do here is to give the figure in Indian units, then Western units in parenthesis. i.e.: ₹3 crore (30 million rupees).
• The organisation had earlier protested programs You changed organisation → organization. However, Indian English uses the British spelling with an s. (see Indian English#Spelling and MOS:ENGVAR.)
• The section Relief and charity work is in reverse chronological order, which is a little weird.
• The section Advocacy and protests was disorganized, and could have used layout work as part of the copy edit. I organized it topically: protests which turned violent, protests against women's rights, protests against portrayals of Mohammad, and protests of things outside of India.

With the problems introduced, I wouldn't consider this a complete copy edit.

Copy editing requires thoroughness, attention to detail, and a good understanding of style issues. I'm sure you'd get better results if you took your time and really considered the best way to present the information. – Reidgreg (talk) 01:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your copy edit seems to be limited to rephrasing one sentence and adding a half-dozen wikilinks. Here are some additional changes I made to the article:

• In the list of comparative health advantages, there is overcapitalization. The section also has a forward slash (MOS:SLASH) and some consideration should be given to whether the list should be ordered or unordered (MOS:LISTNUMBERED). If ordered, the list introduction should indicate why.
• There is more overcaptialization in later section headers, which should have sentence case.
• from 1978 - 1998 → from 1978 to 1998 (MOS:RANGE)

Note that the article was tagged with {{essay-like}}. This is an issue that a copy editor can address by applying encyclopedic tone to the article. Check the diff of my edit. While an essay tries to lead the reader through an argument, an encyclopedia article relays the accepted facts. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Urban Versis 32 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit my user page, even though you meant well. In the future, you can just post a note on my talk page. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I will leave a message in the future. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. BilCat (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...please see Template talk:WEmoji. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Urban Versis 32 (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kawasaki Ki-22, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Urban Versis 32 How are you? I noticed you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation and wanted to see if you'd be open to collaborate. The Wikipedia article Urban air mobility is outdated, and I've researched to create a better version in my sandbox. Another Wikipedian has given the proposed new version their thumbs up but has been inactive. Would you be open to review and if you accept it, publish the new content on the article. Please let me know if you have any questions!--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I always like to help review and improve articles that need them! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your user name at adopt user page. I would like for you to adopt me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregwire13 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I would love to mentor you! Feel free to post any questions you have about anything here! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi UV32,

sysbench needs an article. It is used by linux community and there is no article for this software. — Gregwire₁₃ ^(talk!) 22:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregwire, I would like to assist with your article. I need to do some research to see if the article is notable enough for its own page. I also use Linux and am part of the Linux WikiProject, so I know a little bit about the sysbench command. As soon as you publish the first revision of the article, I can help too. I will add it to the list of in-development pages at the Linux WikiProject too. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Urban Versis 32. I read on the Userboxes page you are open to userbox requests. I do actually have a userbox that I want you to make. One that says "This user is grateful for Man-Man he opened up doors" but link the Man-Man to Kendrick Lamar, and in the left container thing an "FT" that links to Family Ties (song). I have no preference on colors or anything like that. Thanks! TheGOATTB12 (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created your custom userbox. I am open to suggestions for tweaking it if you wish.

FT	This user is grateful for Man-Man he opened up doors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This looks great! TheGOATTB12 (talk) 01:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kaman K-700, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 03:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/bot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/clap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/cool has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/determined has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/expressionless has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/eyebrow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/grin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/grin2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/highfive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/monocle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/ok has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/person has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/rolleyes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/sad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/sad2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/smile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/smirk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/speak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/think has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/thumbsdown has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/thumbsup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/wink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/wp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WEmoji/write has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think there was a mistake -- I simply updated the note that was next to my username so that anyone who saw it could see my goals regarding the project. My apologies for the misunderstanding. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:55, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]