Benutzer Diskussion:Huon

Hallo Huon, willkommen in der Wikipedia!
Danke für dein Interesse an unserem Projekt, ich freue mich schon auf deine weiteren Beiträge. Die folgenden Seiten sollten dir die ersten Schritte erleichtern, bitte nimm dir daher etwas Zeit, sie zu lesen.
	Hilfe:Neu bei Wikipedia Zugang zu allen wichtigen Informationen.		Wikipedia:Tutorial Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung für Einsteiger.
	Wikipedia:Grundprinzipien Die grundlegende Philosophie unseres Projekts.		Wikipedia:Mentorenprogramm Persönliche Einführung in die Beteiligung bei Wikipedia.
Bitte beachte, was Wikipedia nicht ist, und unterschreibe deine Diskussionsbeiträge durch Eingabe von --~~~~ oder durch Drücken der Schaltfläche über dem Bearbeitungsfeld. Artikel werden jedoch nicht unterschrieben, und wofür die Zusammenfassungszeile da ist, erfährst du unter Hilfe:Zusammenfassung und Quellen.    Hast du Fragen an mich? Schreib mir auf meiner Diskussionsseite! Viele Grüße, Astrofreund Lebe lang und in Frieden! 16:00, 18. Mai 2014 (CEST)[Beantworten]

Continuing discussion from en-wiki because I've been indisposed to editing my talk page in an act of blatant censorship. This is admins' typical way of dealing with things; block and censor the editor, while condoning the outrageous behaviour of WP:SPAs with an peculiar interest in one particular schoolboy.

• I have continually talked about the problems with the article on en:Aryton Cable. There are clear child protection issues with this article that need to be dealt with. I can only hope that someone else has the clear sense to deal with it, though I stongly suspect they will get the same jackbooted strong-armed mistreatment if they try. Maybe Master Cable's parents would intervene.

• I have continually been stalked and maliciously provoked by people ignoring me and complaining wrongly about. I'm not saying I've never attakced anyone, but only have done once or twice so in the face of clear provokation, wiki-stalking, attempts at petty war-winning, etc, while I was asking totally reasonable questions about policy and how this is implemented by admins concerned. It is hard to see those "attacked" as being anything other than deserving of complete and utter contempt for their behaviours. Most of the claimed "attacks" were not attacks at all but fair and legitimate commentary - those that weren't were provoked.

Now let's get onto the main point: Play the ball not the man

The aim and effect of such accusations of personal attacks is to take the discussion away from the important point - a ridiculous article on a nobody, and turn it onto away from the problematic material. You don't want to talk about it because you can't justify its existence. Let's talk about that. How can we have an article on an obscure 13 year old schoolboy whose WP:SPAs have to overinflate his massively mediocre career? How can an admin close an WP:AFD with consensus to delete with non-arguments? And then ignore reasonable request that he reviews his own decision all because some "editor" comes in and starts whining about how much his "feeling are hurt" because I pointed out he had made a bad argument?

You really don't comprehend how much of a problem you have here. Claudebone (Diskussion) 11:50, 2. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

I think I'll continue to maliciously provoke you by ignoring you. I'm far less familiar with the German Wikipedia's guidelines and policies than the English Wikipedia's, but I cannot imagine the German admins like indef-blocked editors from the English Wikipedia coming here to continue the conduct that got them blocked over there. If you leave another message on a talk page of mine that isn't related to my activities on the wiki in question, I'll have to look into getting your account globally locked for cross-wiki disruption. Huon (Diskussion) 21:20, 2. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Thanks for your reply. I am thankful for the assistance of the German Wikipedia and its reasonableness and openness that permits discussion of ideas. Well I say discussion. I mean that I make reasonable points, while others shout irrelevant objections and refuse to discuss the points made. Now, I wouldn't be surprised if you did have me further blocked because it's the sort of petty war-winning that players of the Wikipedia game engage in. And to play that game, one makes Nazis look nice and cuddly but I guess you should know all about the Nazis though maybe not so much about the war-winning aspect.

My understanding is that the German Wikipedia has thorough standards of notability and are therefore unlikely to suffer fools who write about the overhyped achievements of a 13 year old nobody who happens to be their acquaintance/their son/themselves/whatever (I don't give a shit what the exact relationship is). No doubt it takes child protection seriously as well, unlike on the English Wikipedia, where anything goes apparently. Claudebone (Diskussion) 06:43, 4. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Your silence, and your infantile, inept, disgusting, filthy, bullying, fascistic, moronic and ultimately pathetic and entirely contemptible attempts to censor an editor asking important questions are absolutely damning, Benutzer:Huon. Absolutely damning. It's about time you reconsidered yourself. Claudebone (Diskussion) 17:56, 7. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Huon: please, can you help me with the block on en.wikipedia? What's that block for??? What have been done with this range to deserve such a heavy block? It's 3 months for 65536 IPs! If I had wanted to disrupt Wikis I would have used other ways, and there's no real need for me to create an account following the way you said because I could use my key or mobile with different IPs... My request is just to reconsider the block itself, it's really too much and it damages too many innocent people. And I haven't understood yet what was that block for, has someone repeatedly vandalised admins' pages? I really can't imagine what somebody has done to cause such a huge block! Please, I'm begging you not just for me but also for all the unguilty Italians who'll be affected by this block for months and discouraged to contribute! Please, whatever you can do, even just talking to the blocker admin or somebody else to review the block, do it. These are the words of another admin or user about this block: "The fact that a checkuser levied this block is a lot more damning than you think - Large numbers of innocent editors specifically contraindicate a rangeblock." 151.20.56.134 10:20, 12. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

This is not my "talk page for editors blocked on the English Wikipedia". I will not answer queries unrelated to the German Wikipedia on this page. Huon (Diskussion) 10:36, 12. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Thanks so much for your indiference... I read your reply, and you should know I have no way to talk with anyone in en.wikipedia, I came here for this... The range block is inconveniencing for 65535 potential users, because I can do my edits in the ways I told you already... 151.20.56.146 14:42, 12. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

You can still edit your user talk page on the English Wikipedia or, as you just confirmed, do edits in other ways. Thus there is no need for you to edit my talk page on the German Wikipedia. The next reply will be in German. Huon (Diskussion) 14:46, 12. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Danke schön... Pfff 151.20.59.137 14:55, 12. Feb. 2016 (CET)[Beantworten]

Guten Tag Eltomas2003 (Diskussion) 04:43, 13. Mär. 2018 (CET)[Beantworten]