Template talk:DNA antivirals

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconPharmacology Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

TfD debate[edit]

This template survived a discussion at TfD. Several editors said it should be 'flattened' in some way. The debate can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Arcadian 19:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should viricides be added to this template? -- stillnotelf has a talk page 02:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, but I'd reckon not. This template seems to be for drugs taken internally. Perhaps ask Ben.c.roberts, the user who originated it ..?  Best wishes, David Kernow 18:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also tend towards no, I just thought it should be brought up. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 23:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

I propose this template be split into HIV and non-HIV antivirals. It's getting very big. User:Hopping T 04:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can see what I created at Template:HIVpharm.User:Hopping T 22:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a pretty good idea. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOV-002 is currently in Phase III under Fast Track Special Protocol Assessment. why are you saying Never to Phase III?

http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00347412

Fully enrolled Phase III trial link supplied.

Bixbyte (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Bixbyte[reply]