Template talk:Hollyoaks

Television: Hollyoaks Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by the Hollyoaks task force.

I have updated this to be in chronological order to follow soaps such as Coronation Street, Emmerdale and Eastenders. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.47.112 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 8 July 2008

Personally I would prefer it in alphabetical order. I believe the list of characters is in chronological order, so I don't see why the template has to be. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 18:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more used to the chronlogical format, although I can see the point of the alphabetical format. The only thing I wonder about with the chronological format is about the placement of people who leave for some time and return (like Mandy and Cindy) although I guess putting them as some of the earliest characters is probably the usual format. --JamesB3 (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Has John Paul already been removed from the template? Or am I missing his name? --JamesB3 (talk) 21:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He seems to be missing. Hmm, considering there seem to have been a number of issues with this, I'm considering switching it back to alphabetical for the time being. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 21:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the template I changed the name to Hollyoaks Later, then saw through the history it had been changed earlier by an anon and then was reverted for being unsourced. Just thought I'd add some kinda link to show that Late Night Hollyoaks has now been renamed to Hollyoaks Later. Plus it's been sourced within the article itself. londonsista | ^Prod 03:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the time, it had been changed across the board without any kind of sourcing for the new name. However, I later confirmed it had been changed and updated the relevant pages, but missed the template. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 08:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]