Template talk:Islamic philosophy

Islam Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Philosophy Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The Chinese and Indian philosophy templates now both have sections for important concepts. I think it would be helpful if this template had one too. However, I know next to nothing of Islamic philosophy, so I would feel less than up-to the task for devising a list. Who wants to brainstorm? Dan Cottrell (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary list: ‘Ilm, Ijtihad, I'jaz, Ummah, Qiyas, Maslaha, Haal, Nafs, Irfan, Qadar, Shura, Ijma, Tawhid, and Asabiyyah. Again, I'm not an expert, I just consulted a few glossaries in some books I have and some wikipedia pages to come up with the list. I'd love some input. Dan Cottrell (talk) 18:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm going to add it as is. I'd love for feedback, though. Dan Cottrell (talk) 18:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This template is about Islamic philosophy. As such, I think the theologians should have a separate template. Looking forward to any comments, but lumping theologians and philosophers together is incorrect, as many times, the theologians themselves were opposed to the philosophers. --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 12:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ibn Taymiyyah oppose every kind of philosophical thinking, then how can we include him in this template! He would not agree if he were alive now. In the other word, if the template include Ibn Taymiyyah, then why it does not include Ibn Hanbal, Abu Hanifah, etc?--Seyyed(t-c) 15:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]