Template talk:World rock

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconRock music Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force Template‑class
WikiProject iconTemplate:World rock is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Surely the header is better linking to Rock music rather than rock and roll ? -- Beardo 04:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point, hadn't noticed that before. I don,t think anybody would have opposed if you'd changed it yourself, though. Circeus 04:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colour[edit]

Red is the colour for rock info boxes. Is there a reason why this template is light blue? If there is no objection in a reasonable time I will change it to fit in with other templates.--SabreBD (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not geology![edit]

I was googling for a concept in geology and one of the things that turned up was "Mexican rock". But that was about rock music, not about geology. I moved it to Mexican rock music. I did the same thing with Icelandic rock music. There's a lot of work to do here, obviously. All the others need to get changed in this template and the articles need to get moved. I mentioned this on the talk page of the rock music Wikiproject more than a month ago. Not much has happened yet, if anything. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]