User talk:61x62x61

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

61x62x61

Userpage User Talk Contributions Sandbox



Welcome!

Hello, 61x62x61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 20:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dinosaur classification[edit]

Hello, 61x62x61;

Thank you for your edits, but on Dinosaur classification I reverted to an earlier version because you had added original research (including Avimimoidea and Ceracephalosauria, two groups that have not been coined elsewhere) to a section that was tied to Michael Benton's classification scheme (available on this page). For reference, Wikipedia does not include original research, and it's never a good idea to change something that has a reference or footnote (unless the cited material is misquoted, of course). J. Spencer (talk) 23:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Avicephala and Reptile. Some of your edits constitute original research and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark t young (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Atrociraptor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 20:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Nuvola apps important.svg

As per previous warnings, your continuing edits to Abelisaur, Velocisaurus, Masiakasaurus, Dinosaur classification, and Thecocoelurus are violating wikipedia's stance on original research. Please provide references if you are going to make extensive changes to dinosaur classification to support your edits, please see WP:verification. Mark t young (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks[edit]

thanks for changing that for me on my page. i dont mind, however for others, i would ask before editing user pages. thanks again!the juggresurection IstKrieg! 03:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changes to sourced information[edit]

Please stop changing information that is taken from published sources, as you recently did on Oviraptorosauria. By changing the order of the cladogram, you are misrepresenting the contents of the published paper Senter 2007. Senter did not place Hagryphus at the base of Caenagnathoidea, he placed it in a clade with Elmisaurus etc. If you feel you have a better or more current source, please discuss on Talk and if everyone agrees, we can change the whole ting and change the citation from Senter to someone else. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jurassic timeline[edit]

Hi, I noticed you editing the Jurassic graphical timeline. It may save you time to know that Wikipedia has a policy saying something along the lines of "don't fix redirects that aren't broken". The user ends up at the same page, and the edits involved place unnecessary strain on the servers - as well as being a poor use of editors' time! Thanks for getting involved, though. Best wishes, Smith609 Talk 15:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Ah, I see now that you have only just created the redirect page. Ignore me! Smith609 Talk 15:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[edit]

Hi. I removed the logo you added to Nirvana's info box. Logos and such are no longer wanted in infoboxes, all band names are just spelled with the normal WP font. This style rule was introduced a few months ago. (I think it's a shame, but anyway...)  Channel ®   09:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, thanks for mentioning. 61x62x61 (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Randomguy24-MyPage[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Randomguy24-MyPage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!Talk 02:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC) ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!Talk 02:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I moved the template to User:61x62x61/MyPage. Is that OK? --61x62x61 (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]