User talk:Anamyd

Hi Anamyd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

See above. Your understanding of this is appreciated.

TONY MAY,

It was your idea, so you do it yourself. Or, if you want someone else to create it, mention it in the talk page of the 158 article. I didn't "add" the information; it was there for a very long time. You were messing / interfering with long-established information in that article through its destructive removal, and after I've done actual things in my day I shall be once again reinstating the information which, unbelievably, you've removed yet again. Any third removal of it by yourself will be reported, and I'll mention you on the talk page of the 158 article. You "long term established users" think you have some right to nonsensically make destructive edits involving removal of content which other users have taken varying portions of their day to add. Never mind "nonsense about Thailand", it's your removal of the content that's nonsense. I had to revert an edit revertal by someone in America on another article containing information relating to Wales - I had spent hours of my day on it so I wasn't having any of it. Unlike you though, that user left it alone after reading my edit reason. I hope you'll do the same once I've reinstated the information to the 158 article later. Oh yeah, please don't give me any of that "your understanding of this is appreciated" rubbish. It would only be possible for my understanding of your nonsense to be appreciated if I did in fact understand it, which I don't. Yet more nonsense from Tony. "Thank you for not smoking" comes to mind. Leave me alone.

ANAMYD

It was your idea to add text to the Class 158 article that was completely WP:OFFTOPIC. Now, I'm not an expert on the Thai machines - (perhaps you are? I bow to your superior knowledge) - so I'd be reluctant to create an article on them. Tony May (talk) 15:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You also might want to read WP:INTRODUCTION particularly the bit where it says "if you don't want people to change your work, don't add it" (or wise words to that effect)Tony May (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anamyd. I noticed your edit on British Rail Class 170 had the summary previous sourced turned out to be wrong and not actually what I saw happen. I just wanted to caution you that Wikipedia frowns upon original research: we prefer verifiabile, reliable sources. If you believe something is wrong then you need to be able to back it up with more than just "I saw it". Of course we also don't want incorrect information! Anyway, thankyou for your edits, it's good to see people supporting articles relating to transport! -mattbuck (Talk) 20:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've learned from this now. Anamyd (talk) 11:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Anamyd, we seem to have got into a dispute over British Rail Class 142. Please be aware that the standard of Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. I understand that you believe the information contained in this article to be incorrect, and that you find RAIL to not be an authoritative source. But RAIL is generally a good source for rail industry information, and if you believe it is incorrect it is upon you to provide evidence for your claims. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Midlands Trains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at West Midlands Trains, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not accuse me of "vandalism". West Midlands Trains now has 350401, 350404, 350405 and 350410. It's not like the fleet details table of the Class 350 article says that ot anything (!) Anamyd (talk) 00:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• or Anamyd (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Surprised you didn't change the 81 to 79 and the 4 to 6 Anamyd (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transport for Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Rail Class 170, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardiff Central (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Rail Class 153, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dispensation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Rail Class 153, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 175, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 09:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have on a number of occasions now made edits that have changed "British Rail Class nnn" to "Class nnn" in articles that you consider to post-date BR, as in this diff, and you have on a number of occasions been told in response that the change is inconsistent with established style. Please start a discussion either on the talk page of the relevant article, or ideally at the WikiProject UK Railways page, to seek consensus before continuing. XAM2175 ^(T) 19:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to do this, therefore, Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to British Rail Class 197, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 197, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maurice Oly (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 97, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Rail Class 97, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 08:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]