User talk:Anas1712

Welcome!

Hello, Anas1712, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The article Oulfa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No substantive content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daniela Mercury has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. I am a violinist ♫ talk to me here! 11:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Greece. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Greece redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 13:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Greece, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 03:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your edits on the Azad Hind page. This is because the edits replicate a number of previous edits on the page we have been deemed and/or discussed as baised and PoV. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 12:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha! Anas1712 (talk) 18:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Meaghan Blanchard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of European Merit
		For you
		this WikiAward was given to Anas1712 by 109.128.136.92 (talk) on 08:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Swiss Barnstar of National Merit
		For you
		this WikiAward was given to Anas1712 by 109.128.136.92 (talk) on 08:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Excellent User Page Award
		For you 109.128.136.92 (talk) 08:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Userpage Shield
		For you 109.128.136.92 (talk) 08:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When tagging a page witgh {{copyvio}} please remember to also list it at WP:CP as described in the instructions in the template. The copyvio at Episkopi, Limassol has only jsut be dealt with as those that deal with copyvios at WP:CP were unaware of it. A bot would normally automatically list anything that was not listed but this was down for several months and it's best it is not relied upon. Dpmuk (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum of the First National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huangpu District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of federations of trade unions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |)
• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

myself from SPAL desk...--80.14.251.162 (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Neihu Line (Taipei Metro) page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anas1712. Thanks for your recent updates at Mexican Drug War. Can you please start using edit summaries for your updates? It's hard to know why you've deleted large chunk of material, and it's also hard to know what kind of information you're adding. Unexplained removals of large material becomes harder for everyone to assume good faith, which means your edits are likely to be reverted per WP:FIES. I'd appreciate if you can explain your updates at the Mexican Drug War page so far as well since I'm a page watcher. Thanks, MX (✉ • ✎) 13:54, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Most of the info removed is sourced with recent references. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MX: As I've indicated in the top of the section, I'm working on the references (mostly, journal references) and as I've worked yesterday late in the night, I've saved it unfinished, to be sure that I can continue to edit it today. So, today in the morning, I've match the multiples references in one per article, but as I didn't know the FIES policy, I didn't write a summary because I've placed the template in the begin of the section.

Sorry for some errors I've made, but as my mother wiki is the french wiki (my mother language is French too, so if I've done vocabulary or grammar faults, my excuses) and thanks for having helped me. --Anas1712 (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anas1712. Don't worry. I didn't think your edits were vandalism. I just didn't know what you were trying to do and figured it would be easier for everyone if you provided an explanation in your edit summaries (the templates in the section are usually meant for readers only since they are the ones who are not viewing your changes through a Watchlist). Both practices are good, so thank you for adding a template. I'm still a bit confused as far as why you deleted sources, but I'll wait for an explantion here or in the edit summaries. Please feel free to proceed with your contributions now that you know this. MX (✉ • ✎) 14:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MX: I've just added too much reformulated cite journal templates for already journal article references (with the autofill function in the toolbar), so i just try to wikify journal references who were already in the text. The others contributions are not of me. I should have done offline or in my userspace, but I've done it in the article itself. Here is what I've done in article, I haven't add info in the rext, just tried to wikify the references. Thanks, --Anas1712 (talk) 15:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: You can see in this history link that, except in the top of the article, where I haven't personnaly worked, nothing have been added in the cleaned references (I've wikified it, of course). [16:05, 4 August 2018 (UTC)]

 Note: Removing {{underconstruction}} tag as Mexican Drug War#Effects in Mexico has not been edited for 3 days – Waddie96 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Waddie96: Sorry, I've not returned to the page since i've finished editing 4h of august in the afternoon and i didn't remove the template.--Anas1712 (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you could ask the bot to do large categories late at night, rather than the middle of the day, that would be great. See here for why. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok --Anas1712 (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Central South Slavic, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Central South Slavic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Central South Slavic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Antichrist of Khorasan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Nikrad2020, Mccapra: The article has been translated in English from Persian on this diff, on a wrong page. So, I forked the translation on a different page, and restored the original page. So, the author and responsible of the draft is User:Nikrad2020 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). --Anas1712 (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FYI for the future, re: this edit, BBC News is a publisher, not a work (not a title). SarahSV ^(talk) 20:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patti Mayor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antichrist of Khorasan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

for your work on espionage/intelligence

please note that the talk pages require

project tags - wherever possible. Hope that makes sense.

JarrahTree 14:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to any page on Wikipedia. According to policy, WP:REDNO, red link categories must be removed or a category created. Adding red link categories to an article just means that another editor has to later follow up after you and remove them, creating work for other people. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anas1712. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antichrist of Khorasan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of assets owned by 21st Century Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Sports.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anas1712: how is it that you have over 10,000 edit cout but you are only an extended confirmed user? How does that work?

Thanks in advance

Motlatlaneo (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Motlatlaneo:,

As you can see in my edit counts (here for French and English WP) that I most edits page(in maintenance almost). I try to understand how English WP community works but I've still my old French WP habits. More than that, I'm not very fluent in writing. So, that's why I'm not trying to have a post.

Thanks for asking, Anas1712 (talk) 16:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

.

Please don't run Citation bot to change "work" to "newspaper" in citation templates. It's a pointless cosmetic edit and has so far been applied inconsistent to the existing citation style (which must be retained per WP:CITEVAR). For the record, "work" is universal across most CS1 templates, while "newspaper" is not. SounderBruce 03:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am reverting your addition of a date of birth to Kym Karath because of two concerns. 1) If a date is shown, it needs a visible citation associated with it, rather than a comment in the edit summary. 2) Wikidata and IMDb, both of which you mentioned in the edit summary, have problems with regard to reliability. IMDb is unreliable. (See WP:IMDB.) Wikidata has its own problems, as summarized in the statement, "Wikidata content is of variable reliability. By its nature (scooping data from multiple wiki-projects) it cannot be treated as a reliable source given the differing standards across all wiki-projects (and wiki-data's own requirements)." (Wikipedia:Wikidata/2018 State of affairs).

WP:BLPPRIVACY calls for use of "... dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public." We need better sources than Wikidata and IMDb to meet that standard. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistake, I would take more precosions for adding dates. But I've found the dates in other wikis, maybe inserted via Wikidata in infobox. In all case, if someone would find the info, it's on Wikipedia, he must just change the language.

Anas Anas1712 (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anas1712: Please explain the 19 March 2022 edit of Dixie Highway. What is the date December 15, 2020 in these citations supposed to represent? Fabrickator (talk) 03:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fabrickator,

This was an edit of Citation Bot on a page I've added on my list of articles to work on. The |date= parameter is about the publication date of the weblink, and with info found via Firefox, I've checked that it's true that the page has been added the 15 december 2020.

Anas1712 (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anas1712. While Tiruvallur is indeed a satellite city of Chennai, both Avadi and Tambaram are suburbs of Chennai, lying within the CMA. For administrative reasons, they both have been upgraded to corporations from being municipalities. Nevertheless, they are parts of Chennai, well within the CMDA's administration. Hence, I've changed the categories accordingly (reverting your changes). Please feel free to correct these if you find sources saying otherwise. Thank you. Rasnaboy (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orient Forest Regional Natural Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lac d'Orient.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I notice that you have added "Queen Victoria" navboxes to a number of articles. Please can you take a look at WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. It says "Every article that transcludes a given navbox should normally also be included as a link in the navbox, so that the navigation is bidirectional." So, my understanding is that either you need to include a series of new links in the Queen Victoria navbox or remove the navboxes, as they are not currently bidirectional. Happy to discuss. Dormskirk (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

It's true that I have seen that most articles about monuments named for Victoria's jubileums are not included in her navbox, but as the other monarchs' template are included in articles related to the jubileum, I've added that. The fact is that I've used Transclusion check about the {{Jubilees of British monarchs}} and I've filled the navbox where it isn't present,when I saw many article related to Victoria, I added the template. Here is the explication. Anas1712 (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for that. I take the point that you have added the names to {{Jubilees of British monarchs}} but I don't think that helps with {{Queen Victoria}}. I cannot say I am too bothered about it, so I will leave it to your discretion, but other editors may make the same observation. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:ORDER and move the coordinates in Jubilee Clock Tower, Weymouth and other articles back to their correct place. I don't know why you have decided to put them at the top of these articles, but the coordinates belong near the bottom, after navboxes. Thanks. PamD 20:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When changing categories of templates, please ensure that the <noinclude> tag starts right after the last character of the template's wikitext. Please don't add a line break before <noinclude>, as you did in Special:Diff/1122209241. For details, see WP:CAT#T. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you to observe what Andrybak said above. Nardog (talk) 08:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that what I will do, but putting "<noinclude>" in the line after the last "}}" don't add a space in the pages that use the template. That's why I think it's ok to put the category in the line after. In all cases, as I've seen, the norms are written, so I will omply with it. Anas1712 (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does. If the space doesn't show up in the resulting page, that's only because there's no blank lines between the template and whatever block element follows it. If the source has

{{foo}}  bar 

and {{foo}} has a line break before <noinclude>, the page will be rendered with an extra <br> before "bar". Nardog (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i unterstand. I've already stop doing that with the message of Andrybak, but thanks for the explication. Anas1712 (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my proposal to speedily rename: Hugo999 (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:2022 Africa floods to Category:2022 floods in Africa
• Category:2022 Asia floods to Category:2022 floods in Asia
• Category:2021 Asia floods to Category:2021 floods in Asia
• Category:2020 Asia floods to Category:2020 floods in Asia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Malu, Shanghai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Malu, Shanghai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinopharm (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 19:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No offense. Hello. I think these entries are still worth adding, and I will expand them based on the Chinese Wikipedia or the original language entries. Thanks! Ansony89 (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not me, it's @Fram: who revert your edits. I just restored my edits (link to wikidata, autority control & cats), who are worth it, if there is still a redirect. Anas1712 (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anas1712!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]