User talk:Chidgk1

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Your GA nomination of Climate change in Turkey[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Climate change in Turkey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Note to self[edit]

Consider starting and dyk energy trilemma - is it still relevant? Maybe not https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/energy/renewable-energy/opinion/house-lords/110085/lord-teverson-reach-net-zero-and-end-fuel

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST[edit]

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!
Environmental impact of Wikipedia logo.jpg

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

Climate Change in Austria[edit]


World Weather Attribution[edit]

This has been deleted. You may perform your move now. UtherSRG (talk) 16:27, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Text-source integrity[edit]

Good afternoon. Could you please be more careful about WP:text-source integrity? It's concerning to see an experienced editor like you say in an edit summary that the added text is not supported by the cited source.

You seem to be making quite general statements with news articles unsuited for that kind of statement, something I also saw at solar power. If you want to make general statements, you really need to use different sources such as academic textbooks, the IPCC reports or other high quality reports. I think one of the best source easy to understand by lay people is the United Nations emission gap report.

Correcting errors with text source integrity is an extremely time intensive process. And vital to keeping trusting Wikipedia high. Remember, quality is better than quantity. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK - I accept your second warning and will try to avoid reoffending in case you strike me out now you are an admin Chidgk1 (talk) 14:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you mean "block" when you say "strike me out", there is nothing to worry about here. I think your net positive to the project (I appreciate how much old cruft you delete) and even if I didn't, I'm WP:INVOLVED, as we work together a lot, which means I'm not allowed to use the admin tools regarding you. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]