User talk:Cracker-Kun

Thanks for uploading File:20th Century Boys Volume 5 special edition.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rokudenashi Blues Volume 33.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Minami no Teio Volume 109.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Oshi no Ko Volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phantom Seer Volume 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shoot! Volume 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Crows Volume 17.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page: List of best-selling manga is protected and I can't edit it. Dragon Ball Super has sold 260 million copies according to the Toei Animation news of May 9, 2021 (Source: https://corp.toei-anim.co.jp/en/press/press-6953497287618550869.html). Can you change that information and put those numbers? And also update the information on the page: Dragon Ball (manga), I can't edit it either. --Dark PikaDex (talk) 13:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that there is no general consensus about DB sales. A lot of sources say that it has 260M, while others say that it has 280M and others that it has over 300M, that is why in the manga list there is the margin of 250-300. And btw those 260M correspond to DB not DBS, the latter has only sold about 3M copies. Cracker-Kun (talk) 13:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But the official information is what Toei Animation says, so it would be necessary to update and put that 260 million copies of Dragon Ball have been sold. In fact, in 2018 there were 250 million copies sold (Source: https://twitter.com/MyutakuFR/status/1058503745804230656). --Dark PikaDex (talk) 14:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the Dragon Ball manga article, you'll see that only overseas it has sold 120M, and in Japan in has sold about 160M, so the most accurate amount is 280M, Oricon says an amount, Toei says another amount, it is difficult to measure it, that is why we use the interval. Cracker-Kun (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But Toei Animation has direct contact with Shueisha, they have done a lot of anime from their manga. That makes it official, the other sources invent the amount. Wikipedia in Japanese and French has already put 260 million copies. --Dark PikaDex (talk) 11:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cracker-Kun (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Spirit Warrior a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Peacock King. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Link20XX (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I could not move it because Peacock King was already a redirect. Cracker-Kun (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could have listed it at WP:RM or made a request at WP:RMT. Link20XX (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cracker-Kun (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too late now since you did it. Best to wait for an admin to delete the page then move it now. Link20XX (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please stop re-adding medals to footballer articles. The removal of medals for football-only events was recently agreed upon by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football community. The fact that these medals have not yet been removed from certain articles does not mean we should re-add them elsewhere. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like @Robby.is.on: said, please stop adding medals to footballer articles while the RFC on the matter is ongoing. GiantSnowman 17:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 17:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The topic may have been brought up recently, but during several years what it is done here is to put every international honour in the infobox. You can check literally any article and you will see that it has the medals on. Cracker-Kun (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, that does not make it right - and no, not every article has it, hence you adding it to them. GiantSnowman 17:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go check the history of any well-known player, and you will see that the medals have been there for a long time. Yesterday I just added some of them. Cracker-Kun (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are contradicting yourself. What you are saying is "every article has the medals, except the ones that don't". GiantSnowman 18:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Man stop trolling, you know perfectly what I mean when I say "all". Just check it yourself and you will see that most of them have it. Cracker-Kun (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dismissing my comments as "trolling" rather than dealing with the issues raised shows the weakness/futility of your position. GiantSnowman 18:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Man the fact that even though most articles have medals (check the WC winners of Euro's for example, or players like Maradona, Pele, Messi, Ronaldo, etc), and you just keep with your idea makes me think you are a troll, sorry if you are not. The topic has been brought up recently, so you should wait the resolution before reverting those edits, but whatever. The ones I added were less known players, that is why some of them did not have it. Cracker-Kun (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman is an admin. I suspect I'm closer to being a troll than GS, but I'm not even that. Just because articles have something or do not have something does not mean that there is consensus from the project that is supposed to maintain those articles agrees with the current state. For the record, the current consensus is no medals, but there is some debate if Olympic medals should be permitted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Blaise Nkufo article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 19:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all the info im using for youth teams is on transfermarkt, which is a pretty good source for this type of info. Cracker-Kun (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source - but even if it was, you need to include the source as a reference. GiantSnowman 19:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since when TM is not a good source for transfers of players? And most articles don't have a reference for youth teams in the reference section if that is what you mean. Cracker-Kun (talk) 19:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Luis Suárez, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaká, without citing a reliable source. As is evident from previous warnings, this falls into a repeated string of adding youth clubs to articles without providing a source. As GiantSnowman mentioned previously, Transfermarkt is not recognized as a valid source, and substantive additions to articles must have a reference included. Again, as mentioned previously, please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Anwegmann (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source of Kaka is literally on the article in the "Early life" section. Cracker-Kun (talk) 16:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "early life" section discusses a makeshift local youth squad in which the team's name is in italics—hardly an official youth team that deserves to be listed in the infobox. If you have a source proving that it was the latter, that would be required to include it therein. Anwegmann (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronald Koeman. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? Mattythewhite (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material? Have you been dead the past half an hour? Have you even checked the official Twitter account? The one who should be ban is you for an unprecedent ban warning and undone edit. Trolls like you should not be in Wikipedia. Cracker-Kun (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some reading material for you, to help you to understand how an encyclopaedia works: WP:BURDEN, WP:CIVIL. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You dont have to add a source for everything, I've been editing for a while and the destitutions are never sourced, in order to not fill the page with unnecessary sources. Maybe you are the one that does not know how Wikipedia Football is edited.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Quique Setién, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gaki Deka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 19:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gaki Deka Volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jordi Alba, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Phil Foden, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaki Deka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gaki Deka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cracker-Kun! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mason Greenwood. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that we do not add the youth club appearances in the career statistics, you have been editing here for a while. Cracker-Kun (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chances are Mattythewhite won't see the reply unless you ping them: @Mattythewhite: Robby.is.on (talk) 11:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The EFL Trophy is a senior, first-team competition, even though the appearances were made for an U21 team. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per your source:

"Concerning the situation in Ukraine, in order to provide players and coaches with the opportunity to work and receive a salary, and to protect Ukrainian clubs, unless the parties to the relevant contract explicitly agree otherwise, all employment contracts of foreign players and coaches with clubs affiliated to the Ukrainian Association of Football (UAF) will be deemed automatically suspended until the end of the season in Ukraine (30 June 2022)', without the need for any action from the parties to this effect."

Nobody has been made a free agent, quite the opposite - their contractual rights are frozen to the Ukrainian clubs for the future, but they can get a new club until June. I have corrected this error at Nélson Monte and Marc Gual, if you have put it on any other page please correct it. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:D837:B014:57B4:5252 (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have not changed it in any other article, thank you for the clarification. Cracker-Kun (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Sánchez. GiantSnowman 18:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Edinson Cavani, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has no use to put the reference on the article if you are just gonna remove it after checking the page just like what they did in the Robert Sanchez article. Cracker-Kun (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phil Foden, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to accept that you do have to add your source to the article at the same time as you add content. This is an absolute basic of how Wikipedia works, especially where biographies of living people are concerned, you've been here plenty long enough to know that. Wikipedia's readers shouldn't have to guess where the content comes from, and other editors shouldn't have to go round finding and adding your sources for you. Straight off a block for doing the exact same thing, I'd have thought you might have more sense. See competence is required. Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As to BeSoccer, I have checked it myself for Bellingham's under-age stats. I had to, to add it to the international career section to verify the figures you added and update the figures previously given in that section. The point is that if you are going to add or change content, then you are supposed to add the source that verifies your changes. Struway2 (talk) 08:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Govvy (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing to add unsourced or inadequately sourced information. In view of the number of warnings you have received, the two shorter blocks that have been imposed, the fact that none of those have had any effect on your editing, and your responses to messages, in which you have in effect openly refused to follow policy, I seriously considered making the block indefinite. I have instead blocked for just one month, to give you another chance to comply. However, it is highly likely that you will be blocked indefinitely if after this block is over you continue in the same way. Whatever your personal opinions are as to what Wikipedia policy on sources should be, you have to edit according to what they are. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

where did you get the info in this edit from ? i am talking about the youth career 2601:6C5:8100:6D80:3C0B:8446:39F2:4373 (talk)

Hello, Cracker-Kun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaki Deka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]