User talk:DeadEyeSmile

Hello,

Sorry, just now read your message. Yes, to your question I can provide Maggie's Volga German ancestry. Please let me know how to proceed, if an email is easier, my email is xxxxx.

Thanks in advance !

Dan

This is ironic since you are the one edit warring here. As I mentioned during the multiple rvs you performed, there has been ample debate on the talk page about my change over the last couple of weeks and you have had a chance to participate. Now you mischaracterize my change and try to claim that "no one agrees with me" when the other person in the debate has failed to prove his point or to disprove mine.DeadEyeSmile (talk) 18:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Whataboutism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.