User talk:Gobeirne

Archives

2004-2005, 2006, 2007 –

The above image inspired me to do a little research. After all, we cant have a good pic with no article, can we? Just a note to say I have included it on the newly created Fremantle Town Hall. Thanks! --Ali K 08:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Great stuff! :) Cheers! - Gobeirne 04:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To put up a toast for absent friends at the Perth meetup last night - next one you will deffinitely be on the list! SatuSuro 23:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the kind thoughts! :) Cheers! - Gobeirne 00:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened up an RFC in light of this user's attacks on the Cancer article among others. In light of your contact with this user, could you provide input? Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sunlight001 Mdwyer 04:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote a monorail article in the Norwegian WP (it got recommended), and I am writing more. I like your picture showing how a monorail can go in narrow city streets, but it isn't accessible for the Norwegian WP nor Wikinfo. Would be nice if it were in the Commons. Or could I just copy it to the other wikis? Is it enough that your name is in the filename? I don't know how photographer crediting is done for such copying. OlavN 20:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OlavN. Firstly, congratulations on the monorail article. The pictures I took of the Sydney Monorail are indeed available at Wikimedia Commons.

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:SydneyMonorail1_gobeirne.jpg
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:SydneyMonorail2_gobeirne.jpg

Thanks for wanting to include one of them! :) Cheers - Gobeirne 22:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh. I'm not sure what to add to that. He sure is persistent. I've also reported him at Commons. I'm not sure what advice to give except to intercept and block when found. Anything you can think of that I can do to help I'll be more than glad. I do monitor Child and some other articles where he might lurk. I must say that for your fine detective work you deserve this:

		The Original Barnstar
		To Gobeirne for dogged detective work against the scourge of sockpuppetry Herostratus 04:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't determine a user's IP address, only a checkuser can do that. If that's really his IP, it's blocked now anyway, the system will autoblock any IP addresses recently used by the accounts which were blocked for 24 hours. He's got a pretty obvious vandalism pattern, so if the problem does recur (from an anonymous editor or another sock account), please let me know. The edits from the anonymous editor didn't reveal any names, so that may have been a different editor using the same picture, but I'll keep an eye on it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your message from WP:AIV because it didn't seem like the kind of clear cut vandalism I expected after reading your description, so I thought you were referring to another IP address. I understand it a bit better now, however, I do not think an indefinite block is called for. Those blocks are very, very rarely issued, as an IP almost never stays the same for ever. The IP appears to have gone quiet over the last couple of hours, if he starts again, I'll block. --JoanneB 11:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Joanne - Gobeirne 11:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...from The Netherlands for adding the data about Belginusanl on Wikipedia-en on the pages we keep on this problem. I could identify thanx to you another sockpuppet used on Wiki-nl and add to the general page found here. If new names / clues appear please contact me if you want at my Dutch talk page here. Best wishes, MoiraMoira 13:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC) (sysop Wikipedia-nl)[reply]

• Will do! Thanks - Gobeirne 20:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just came back to review your behaviour about images after several months and I'm wondering why it appears so different now to what it was back then. I thought consistency was important, and my views havent changed much, to me a pic is still worth a thousand words, and just becuase you have a pov about whether a pic is suitable or not is a bit of a lame reason to cut it out with discussion.

"CGI is lightweight and easily transported. It was and still is widely used especially in rural and military buildings such as sheds and water tanks. It's very unique properties were used in the development of countries like Australia from the 1840's, and it is still helping developing countries today."

it seems to me that that pic illustrates at least TWO points in that statement from the article, both added by the same user.

It seems to me that who ever places a pic in an article usually has good intent and for you to mess with that without reference to that person, is inviting an edit conflict. Fortunately i cant be bothered with that, I have a lot more activity an dmy own spaces to fill and share my awesome pics so i'm not giving any more to the wikipedia currently, its mainly cause i cant be bothered with the overhead to do it, and the conflict to keep them in the position that I, as an illustrator, see fit. My view is that if I'm generous enough to gift the image then some consideration could be taken into account when deciding to surgically remove or transplant them.. I wonder how the people who silently vote by never coming back think? I like that pic with the sheets on the bike trailer. I think it adds nice texture to the article. I cant help but wonder why you didnt push ALL the pics down into a 'gallery' that I personally find ugly and non useful, I cant understand why people like that. The other part of this that perplexes me, is why WASTE your editing energy in such ways, given the HUGE tasks out there, the VAST field of articles needing real and urgent work to clean up and add to? thats bugged me for nearly two years now, it seems much more obvious to fix up clearly needful articles, why pick on the articles that are only slightly in need? Its not about you, my pondering is about many editors. I'm also trying to assess how wikipedia may have progressed since i got a bit of bad taste from the surgical processes that i felt were unnecessary and unfair. The purpose of that is to try and ensure that my own contribution is useful and sustainable, I cant bear waste, and i want to add stuff that is likely to stick for a while. another point is that while youre in an article you could fix the other obvious errors for instance the three red links in that article? moza 11:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note you left on my talk page! It's nice to know that the bit of sleuthing I did was appreciated :-) I also saw the note you made and then deleted from that page and I have to admit, I agree on both points... One, that this guy's pattern of vandalism is seriously creepy, and two, that at this point there's really nothing to report. I hope most of all that he's just creepy and not actually doing anything harmful, but if it is worse than that, then I hope that he slips up some time and posts an image that's bad enough that there IS something to report to authorities somewhere. So, for what it's worth, you're not the only one who's picked up on the disturbing nature of this case. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 06:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you follow today's link-spam, you'll find the vandals real-life name. Rklawton 04:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Cheers Robert, I'm well aware of his name :) He's a dodgy character alright! Thanks - Gobeirne 04:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I'm contacting all the members of wikiproject Perth because, I have put in an incomplete bid for Perth to hold Wikimania 2008. Please show your support by adding your name to the list and help contribute by improving our bid which is incomplete and located here - thanks Talk to symode09's or How's my driving? 17:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to collaborate in an ambitious new MediaWiki project.
The LabVIEW Wiki. -- Michael Aivaliotis 06:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant foto now in place - thanks. Is there any way you could find out if that wing was later the the great hall etc. It would fit very neatly into what I'm saying about him if it was a later addition. Sorry to ask, but all my Mountfort books went back to the library years ago, and they were a job to borrow even then. Libraries in England and Italy are abysmal in the NZ architecture section! Giano (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Shields (diarist), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 21:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there; you are welcome. That was, I think, the most offensive image I have come across in wiki. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 15:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thing about svg logos is that they can be stretched without losing quality (which is important for fair use, that image is of high quality which does depict the subject in true manner) but that they are also in their original upload form of low resolution (not like 800px stretch you showed). --Avala (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that I've been doing new pages patrol, and that Fremantle Markets is one of the best-written, best-referenced new articles I've seen in some time. Thanks for being awesome. SaveThePoint (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Wow, cheers! - Gobeirne (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Fremantle Markets, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on December 28, where you can improve it if you see fit. Gnangarra 01:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fremantle Markets, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 14:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
		for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. In Kosovo they have huge problem with the name, they are now teaching in schools that it was Kosova before and then changed to Kosovo by Serbs. Also they are now insisting on new term Dardania (Roman name for the area around today's Kosovo). Of course it makes sense as much as saying New Zealand name is not based on Dutch province but on (insert random fantasy here). Regards, --Avala (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of my own curiosity, where did you find those sister city signs in Phoenix, Arizona? I'm a native and I never knew anything about them. ONEder Boy (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi there. It's at 33°26′51.3″N 112°4′34.5″W / 33.447583°N 112.076250°W / 33.447583; -112.076250. Maybe it's fairly new? Cheers - Gobeirne (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the extra pics - will look at incorporating them into the List of Art Deco buildings in Perth article or if I have the time into their own separate articles. Dan arndt (talk) 09:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Perth.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Perth map.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Perth map.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad you liked it. I really like the way you framed your shot of the church as well. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 08:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion Gobeirne, I'll try it out next time I need to make a location map. There are so many useful tools in Wikipedia that the average editor knows nothing about. Mikenorton (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gobeirne. I've tried it out on 1848 Marlborough earthquake, but it seems to interact with the infobox template that I'm using it in, creating an error, any suggestions? Mikenorton (talk) 17:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi - I altered the earthquake template to allow that kind of map. Use "map2" instead of "map". Cheers - Gobeirne (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Now all I need to know is how to upload svg files from Inkscape so that I can add the 'bullseye' graphic. All previous attempts to upload them to commons have failed, you don't by any chance have any ideas on this do you? Mikenorton (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ear wax has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that this link also does not work? You didn't mention it in the task description, so I thought I'd let you know. Regards, Alan16 (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I'll do that at the same time. AWB seems to be running slowly at the moment, but it shouldn't take too long. Regards, Alan16 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry about that - my computer crashed. I don't think AWB did anything - it appeared to be running but I couldn't click on anything. I have to head out for a while now, but I will finish later today. Regards, Alan16 (talk) 20:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gobeirne,

I hope that you're enjoying your wikibreak. If and when you return, take a look at Nankai megathrust earthquakes, which I've expanded to cover Nankai, Tonankai and Tokai great earthquakes. Let me know if that meets the need that you saw.

On another note, I've made great use of your 'map2' version of the earthquake template (70+ articles), so thanks again for that. Mikenorton (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66 wants you to join WikiProject NZ politics.

When you come back from your wikibreak, you might want to consider joining the New Zealand politics taskforce. To do so, please place the following on your user page:
{{User WikiProject New Zealand/politics}}. Schwede66 22:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greg, thanks for adding the photos to Manchester Courts. I use the flickr upload tool for getting free flickr images onto Commons, and when I came across this set of photos, it told me that the licence isn't suitable. I checked manually and that seemed to be the case (unfortunately). Given that you work with photos a lot, is your understanding of the licensing requirements different? Schwede66 23:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi - the original license was "non-commercial", which isn't suitable. I asked the photographer to change the licences to one of the permissable ones, and she did, which is great. It was only changed this morning, so it probably wasn't suitable when you looked with the upload tool. Cheers - Gobeirne (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Good work! Didn't spot that the licence had changed. Schwede66 00:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was so pleased to see yor name pop up on my watchlist [1]. A terrible terrible thing; I know compared to the loss of life, the buildings pale into insigificance - at least they can be rebuilt. Hope all is as well as it can be.  Giacomo  12:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greg, I hope the ground is steady for you. Given that you have contributed many photos on heritage buildings, I thought I'd draw your attention to the List of historic places in Christchurch. On the article's talk page, you'll find a to do list where your skills would be much appreciated. Schwede66 18:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Loved your habit bro...keep it up...very nice snaps Jinky.ajinkya (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universities in Western Australia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Professorjohnas (talk) 15:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavonarolaPlaque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:JarrahFence gobeirne.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gobeirne,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 3, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-06-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gobeirne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gobeirne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hello, Gobeirne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

good to see youre still in the loop editing a west oz item! happy new year and all JarrahTree 00:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gobeirne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gobeirne,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha - should be that congratulations, or hey there sucker! come back to Perth sometime!! JarrahTree 00:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:SaturnThomasKing18Feb06 crop.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:SaturnRuthCrisp18feb06 crop.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no rush could you please email me! whenever, thanks JarrahTree 07:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gobeirne. Thank you for your work on Te Tiriti. Simongraham, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add redirect categories

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Simongraham}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

simongraham (talk) 22:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]