User talk:KatiePack1

Hello, KatiePack1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi KatiePack1; i just wanted to point out something you may already know, or may not. In this edit (you can click on the word this to see it) you incorrectly formatted White's name, by changing from '''John Henry White''' to ===John Henry White===. The three single quotes is the way WP's software is told to make bold the words enclosed, which is what we do the first time an article's subject is mentioned. The three equals signs tell it to make a new section heading. Anyway, it's been fixed, so no harm done. Welcome, and please let me know if i can help in any way. Cheers, Lindsay^Hi 10:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you Lindsay! I am just starting out and am trying to learn more about the proper WP editing techniques. I appreciate the advice! And actually, I do have just another question if you don't mind my asking. What is the proper format to respond to someone like I am doing now. Do I need to sign my own addition to my talk page if responding to someone? KatiePack1 (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KatiePack1. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for signing on with the new project! Cheers, Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Scott Etzler, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Scott Etzler" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KatiePack1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Scott Etzler should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Etzler .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katie, I've been looking for editors to help with some updates and corrections for the MetLife article and to do that, I was looking around at various similar companies and saw that you've made some helpful edits on the Allstate article both recently, and in the past. I was wondering, given that you're also a member of WikiProject Brands, if you'd be interested to take a look at MetLife. I've been offering some edits there as part of my work (I work for an agency called Beutler Ink and we are providing consulting to MetLife) and have been looking for editors to review my suggestions, rather than making edits myself. There are some small requests that I've made recently about updating existing material to improve the references, chronology and accuracy. If you have a bit of time to look them over, it would be most appreciated. Thanks in advance for your input. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Etzler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Etzler (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]