Kuyabribri

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Please read this box first!
Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic by placing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the very end, and please remember, assume good faith! You can click here to start a new topic.

Archives

Archive 1 (August 2006–March 2009)
Archive 2 (April–July 2009)
Archive 3 (September 2009–July 2010)
Archive 4 (August–December 2010)
Archive 6 (January–May 2011)
Archive 7 (June 2011–December 2011)
Archive 8 (January 2012–)

Referee (association football)[edit]

Hello. I saw you made a substantial addition to this article regarding the Dual system of control. Could you please provide a reference for where you found this information? Cheers --LukeSurl^{t c} 21:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm not a fan of this system myself and have never actually seen it, but it does exist in the U.S., believe it or not. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 23:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Posted by Richey90211 (talk · contribs)[edit]

My edits are very valid. Being a person who has in depth knowledge of what took place in those islands because I am from there I know that coolie should not be classed as slavery whatsoever. Coolies should be classed as Indentured Labourers. Coolieism took place after Slavery was abolished and that is a fact. Also the word coolie means wages or hireling. I have sources below. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/136194/coolie http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/records/research-guides/indian-indentured-labour.htm http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2013/11/25/247166284/a-history-of-indentured-labor-gives-coolie-its-stinghttp:

Coolies were given wages, land, and houses for their labor. Generally speaking people today are not even given this. I know this for a fact because I am from these island and the people there were indeed paid. This resulted in a lot of jealousy and anger from African slaves towards coolies and perhaps rightfully so. Indian coolies were paid about $45 dollars a day plus food and clothing.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/136194/coolie http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/records/research-guides/indian-indentured-labour.htm http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2013/11/25/247166284/a-history-of-indentured-labor-gives-coolie-its-stinghttp: http://www.sahistory.org.za/politics-and-society/anti-indian-legislation-1800s-1959 First of all the Category must be changed from Slavery to Indentured Laborer. Second the etymology for coolie is hired laborer or wages. And kuli in turkish means hireling. Thank you and I will get back to you with more changes. I am from these islands and the original article so falsely misrepresents coolies. Many people of Indian and Chinese background took exception to this article because they knew that a lot of the subject matter in the original article was false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richey90211 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a specific request for me please state it, otherwise I will not respond further. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the category for the article from Slavery to Indentured Laborer. Please change quli in turkish from slave to hireling. In Cantonese, the term is 咕喱 (Jyutping: Gu lei). Please change the word "Asian slave" to "Laborer" unsigned comment added by Richey90211 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have copied and pasted the comment you posted on Talk:Coolie. I will respond there when I have time, if another editor has not done so already. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 02:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More about Joaquín Santiago[edit]

Hi, again. You may want to know that the probable-hoax status of Joaquín Santiago (that we discussed some days ago) has been raised by another editor in the BLP Noticeboard and has ultimately resulted in an AFD nomitation. One editor that identifies himself as the son of the article's subject has taken it personally, believing people are calling his father (and not the article) an hoax.

I the end, I believe the article's subject is someone that exists, but it's weird how the article is so full of fake references, that do not seem to back up what's said in the article. And, regardless of the truthfulness of these unreferenced claims, the subject's notability is also disputable. Just in case you're still interested. --damiens.rf 17:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Black Socks Proposed Move[edit]

Hi, this may be of interest to you. Bogger (talk) 10:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets![edit]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Kuyabribri, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
!dea4u 09:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

For Unblocking[edit]

Hello, you can go to lt.wikipedia.org login to your account and unblock me, because I was innocent and blocked me by mistake! Or at least that I could submit a request unblocking--Lukas GamingLT (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Lukas_GamingLTLukas GamingLT (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Lukas GamingLT: You'll need to address that with the admins on LTwiki. Nobody on ENwiki has any authority whatsoever to unblock you. Please stop asking. --ElHef (Meep?) 00:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShoWareCenterlogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShoWareCenterlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kuyabribri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at UKER's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Page Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 18,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G6 and disambiguation pages[edit]

Hi Kuyabribri. Thanks for helping clean up unnecessary disambiguation pages! I wanted to let you know that I have declined to delete a few such pages that you nominated for speedy deletion with the {{db-disambig}} tag. According to WP:G6, disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title are generally only eligible for speedy deletion when there is either one or zero blue-linked articles being disambiguated. For several of the pages that you nominated (e.g. Brilliant Corners (disambiguation)), since there was more than one extant article being disambiguated, WP:PROD is the better option for deletion. I know this is a hassle, but it does give more time for other editors to object in case there's something we missed. All the best, Mz7 (talk) 21:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle barfed? Nah. I blame CATS.[edit]

Hi Kuyabribri, and thanks for your message.
I think went something like this. I had the Twinkle dialog box open with the AfD rationale mostly written up, then got distracted.
When I came back, my cat was siting on the keyboard, and the AfD was already submitted. I considered fixing it up. Or possibly creating the account User:Misssy (rescue cat) and asking her to fix it up, but as you can see, her typing skills aren't that great. Either way, I let it slip, as I'm currently pursuing a personal XTREME TURNING UP TO WORK EARLY project. Hey, I was at my desk at <blink> 8:20 am </blink> today!!!1111eleven.
Thanks again. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: Oddly enough right after I left you that message I wondered if it just so happened that a cat wandered across your keyboard. If not made for sits, why is it made of warm, right? —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 819 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

REGARDING Ryan Hurst (UK) Posted by GriffinKemp97 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Thanks for removing both the speedy deletion and proposed deletion tags that were placed on this article by Reddogsix (talk · contribs). Thanks also for the explanation and advice. I will spend the weekend looking for more reliable sources. You can see from videos online that the credits are verifiable, but many of his UK successes were pre internet articles, he is a currently a celebrity in Eastern Europe from a dual language TV series, but many sources are in Polish, is this OK? I will endeavour to spend the time to ensure the articles meet Wikipedia's criteria. Thanks again, your help and advice is really appreciated.

FXCM - Article Slanted Towards Recentism[edit]

Hi there - thanks a lot for adding the note to the FXCM page to state that you think it is slanted towards Wikipedia:recentism. It seems to be the general consensus with this page. How would you recommend this is resolved? I've tried amending the article and fixing some of the factual errors but there's a user User:Smallbones who is rather keen the page maintains this slanted view. Any thoughts on how to approach this would be most welcome. Lenticularphoto (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the tag was actually added by Sargdub (talk · contribs), not me. I don't wish to get involved with the article's issues on the talk page, but if you seem to be at an impasse with other editors I suggest you check dispute resolution. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Kuyabribri - appreciate the feedback Lenticularphoto (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi, I looked for a page on a band because I liked their album. There was no page, so I Googled their info and created a Wikipedia page about them. Why was it immediately deleted. It was factual about a real band. The band don't exist anymore, so no one is profiting from it. Just doesn't make sense. The info is found on Internet just not on Wikipedia.

Advice?

Why delete?

{{JackDaw67 (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)}} JackDaw67 (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not entirely sure which article you are talking about, but in general any article must meet the notability criteria in order to be included on Wikipedia. Bands and musicians have their own notability criteria which are listed here.

If an article you created on a band was speedily deleted, it's likely that the article contained no credible claim of significance. If an article merely says "Joe's band was founded in 2017, its members are Joe, Bob, and Jim, and it has a self-titled album", there is no credible claim of significance because nothing tells me that X isn't just some garage band that plays at open mic night at the local bar. Note that making a credible claim of significance (e.g., that the band is signed to a record label that has a Wikipedia article, has played at a notable venue, or even has a member that is related to a famous person) will not entirely prevent an article from being deleted, and an article that does not meet the notability criteria can still be deleted after a week-long community discussion.

Please take some time to look through the links I've provided above before attempting to create an article on a band. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy Deletion (Canceled)[edit]

I Am Sure, There is nothing wrong. There is PD Self. Ask One of the Wikipedia Staff. Ask them if I may or may not keep it. It is not your choice. I put PD-self. So I assure you, there is nothing wrong.

                                                                             ~Alex AlexWikiIDK (talk) 19:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can't take an image you grabbed from the Internet and claim that you release it into public domain. And the fact that you are currently blocked indicates to me that at least one administrator agrees that you are violating copyrights with your image uploads. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion[edit]

Hi I wrote an article providing information about the person (Terry Daidone) that hired GeoHot (George Hotz) the infamous hacker (hacked Sony and Apple iPhone) because Terry Daidone was highlighted in red on George Hotz Wikipedia page. I posted other articles about the significance of the first jailbroken phone which Daidone bought and was thorough about what was paid. There have been a variety of messages including copywritten material, cutting and pasting, significance, etc. and I'm not sure why. The subject of Hotz and Daidone have been in the news lately because of the tenth anniversary of the release of the iPhone and the first hack to "untether" the phone. The redirect from Hotz website now gives significance to the red (now blue) name. Could you tell me how to get all of the warnings about the 1 paragraph artice I wrote off of the page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Enodiad (talk • contribs) 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, all articles must meet the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. This usually means that the subject of the article must have been significantly covered in reliable, independent sources. The sources you provided on the article Terry Daidone mention Mr. Daidone in passing, but aren't about him, which is why I believe the article does not meet the notability criteria and why I have nominated the article for deletion. If you can find reliable, independent sources that are about Mr. Daidone I recommend you add them to the article, as I could not find any.

The blue links in the above paragraph link to the official Wikipedia policies about those subjects; please feel free to look through them.

As for the copy-paste tag, another editor placed it there and I don't really know why. I'll remove it. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude[edit]

I was the creator of the original page (Buenavista de San Carlos, Costa Rica). I do not know why the duplicate second page appears as if it were created by me. It must be some mistake. So thank you that the second page has been marked for deletion.

--ErickWikiLoco (talk) 17:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Re: Removing a Prod template to Sarah Austin (Internet celebrity)[edit]

Just wanted to let you know that you forgot to add a {{Deprod-reprod}} to the IP's talk page. --w^L^{<speak·check>} 00:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intel Z370[edit]

If the AfD nomination is withdrawn (which I did), a PROD should generally be ok IMO. In this specific case maybe not, because of the merge tag that I put in place instead of my withdrawn AfD nomination.--Pizzahut2 (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you withdrew the AFD less than an hour after you opened it and no other user commented on it, I might have been inclined to leave the PROD tag and let an admin sort it out. But the merge tag you left on the article tells me that there is a viable alternative to deletion, hence deletion is not uncontroversial. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kuyabribri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deprod: Croatian Youth Party[edit]

Thanks - I entirely forgot about the earlier AfD, and then saw the prod message warning me about it. However, the text didn't say whether prodding it now was OK or not, so I was unsure myself. GregorB (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Kuyabribri[edit]

Hello!

Mr. Kuyabribri

Help the page because Louis Aragon Spreading False information on this page it's look like he's doing Propaganda against Hazaras He block me on in fake Sockpuppet case and i'm finding out how i get out of this fake case. view the History of the Hazaras page i'm sharing information with proof and he's changing it. it's smells like Propaganda against Hazaras. if he's not propagandist so why he's so interest on this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.183.153.141 (talk • contribs) 13 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not getting involved here. I suggest discussing with the involved administrator directly. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More WP:EVASION. Really not a smart idea (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Husayn Shah Mirza). - LouisAragon (talk) 03:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Reg page Kuldeep Pai[edit]

Sharan (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aware that the page 'Kuldeep Pai' has been considered as an article for deletion. I would like to mention that Kuldeep Pai is a very popular musician in India and is well-known for his contributions in Hinduism and Spirituality through music.

I have cited references that are available as external links in the main article that are readily available on the internet. However, just so you know, there are media coverages and articles about him covered in various other newspapers and magazines. The printed version of newspapers bearing his articles and awards have been scanned and uploaded in his website under the 'Press' section - http://kuldeepmpai.com/press/ (Infact, the article 'Kuldeeply Passionate' mentions about Kuldeep's gold medal in Indian Music from Madras University which required the citation in the main article).

I am aware that the references from his own resource are deemed invalid and hence was unable to add these as the citation in the main article. Iam trying my earnest to make this an active page in wiki.

Kindly consider the page to be restored and make it an active wiki page.

Link to the article- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuldeep_Pai

Sharan

Sharan (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SHARANYABHARATHWAJ:, leaving me a message here won't help prevent deletion of the article, but commenting on the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuldeep Pai and otherwise improving the article might help. Please see WP:YFA for some guidance on appropriate article content. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Radmin article reviewing[edit]

Hello @Kuyabribri: I'm writing you regarding Draft:Radmin аrticle because some persons decided to remove this article from Wikipedia and I'm trying to give it a second wind. You wrote in comments to my questions to User talk:MatthewVanitas that you are going to edit Teamviewer article. I kindly ask you also help me improve Draft:Radmin as well, is it possible? Happywren 16:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you misread my comments. My only involvement with the TeamViewer article was to comply with the Wikipedia deletion process. I don't care one way or the other on whether that article is deleted. Additionally, I completely agree with the AfC reviews on Draft:Radmin. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:44, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Porter[edit]

That AfD was a completely different version of Jason Porter, what's wrong with PRODDING this version? Govvy (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically it's only "completely different" if the article was deleted at AfD, which it wasn't. Just trying to save the trouble of waiting 7 days only for an admin to say the same thing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth_A._Loparo[edit]

How do we propose this page for deletion? It's clearly a very low quality, self-promoting article.--128.237.132.27 (talk) 22:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AFD. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 12:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After a closer review of the article, I believe that even if you did nominate this article at AfD, it would be kept because the subject meets several of the criteria at WP:NACADEMIC. It was previously nominated at AfD back in 2014 (see here), and at that time the article was kept on the grounds that the person meets WP:NACADEMIC. The issues you cite should be fixed by improving the article, not deleting it. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Soul[edit]

It was rejected from AFD specifically so the only way was a PROD. Please restore it. -- » Shadowowl | talk 14:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadowowl: It was not "rejected" per se; the closure rationale and the closing admin's message on your talk page clearly explain why the discussion was closed and both cite relevant policy and guidance. Please read those before nominating articles for deletion. The TLDR version is that your deletion rationales are valid rationales for improving the article, not deleting. As for the PROD, per policy an article that has been to AfD and kept is permanently ineligible for PROD, so I will not re-add the tag. If you have any further questions I would suggest taking them up with the admin that closed the AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took it to AFD for the 3th time. -- » Shadowowl | talk 15:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadowowl: I don't 100% agree wth the closing admin's previous speedy keep closures (i.e., I wouldn't have done it myself), particularly at the second one. But the closing admin wasn't wrong, either. That said, I took a look at the 3rd nomination and it looks much better, particularly because you cited failing WP:NMUSIC. I don't know if consensus will be to keep or delete (that's what the 7 day discussion is for), but I think and hope that this wouldn't be speedy kept for no deletion rationale. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Babe Ruth[edit]

I added text and a ref to the Personal life section of Babe Ruth. Leaving you a note here as you are clearly one of the keepers-of-the-flame for the article. Question to you: There is no mention of the piano-in-the-pond story. Has that been in and out of the article in the past? David notMD (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js^(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js^(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
User:Primefac/revdel.js^(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js^(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
User:Evad37/rater.js^(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Stop and listen[edit]

The article Bruce McAbee I proded is a special case. You need to read my prod statement carefully. Then think about it. Then check that the facts are as I represent. We do not blindly follow rules for the sake of following rules. If after conducting a more thorough investigation you still disagree with me, let's talk about it and figure out what to do next. AfD is costly: it takes up people's time, and it takes up administrator time. We don't do AfD when a deletion would be unopposed on the merits by good faith users (ie, not sockpuppets or banned users). Thank you. I am sorry if I am stating the obvious, but the lack of a talk message from you leaves me wondering if you knew the circumstances or not. Jehochman ^Talk 13:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Did you just revert me twice without even having the decency to answer my concerns here? That’s not good form. Please explain your actions. Jehochman ^Talk 04:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jehochman: Actually I did look at the history and did consider leaving your prod tag on the article, so thanks for jumping to conclusions. I removed it anyways because the past AfD was closed as keep, not no consensus or something directly related to the presence of sockpuppets or banned users, which indicates that deletion is not uncontroversial. And before you level accusations at me about lacking "decency" and "good form", please learn to read a page history and a user contribution history. Just because I didn't respond as quickly as you would have liked me to doesn't mean bad faith on my part. Please take a look at WP:AGF and WP:VOLUNTEER. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time to remove a prod tag, but don't have time to reply to a talk page message, it shows incorrect priorities. Talk before reverting. We'll go to AfD again and see how it goes. Jehochman ^Talk 14:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Kuyabribri, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018^[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PROD/AfD mistake on San Antonio mayoral election, 2019[edit]

Apologies on the double deletion request, I honestly meant to PROD the article in Twinkle but accidentally used AfD instead, so I just thought I could PROD it and thought the PROD would override. Mea culpa. - SanAnMan (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Kuyabribri,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kuyabribri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Has Vijay (actor) article been compared to any hollywood actors like tom cruise lol why non neutrality tag if it's sourced??[edit]

Why the unnecessary non neutrality tag has been added to this article. I am new to wikipedia but if the sources are correct and mentioned as per the source why neutrality tag. Please explain??? my friend says This guy is biggest current superstar in south india nothing his mentioned about it and this article is still outdated and neutral. This guy has got numerous fans and some haters as well. It should've been added by a hater of him who doesnt like his growth since he has won a Iara international award. Kindly admins please remove unnecessary neutral tag. Many thanks. Weryops (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at Talk:Vijay (actor). —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from vandalism[edit]

Your edit on Disguised Toast was unwarranted and not in keeping with the rules you claim to follow. As an experienced editor I would expect better behavior. By the letter of the rules of notability the substance of an article does not over ride the fact that it is not notable, please read and learn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline Gloern (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloern: It is you who needs to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies, specifically the deletion policy. Speedy deletion under A7 is intentionally a very low bar, and an article only needs to claim significance to meet that bar; it doesn't actually need to meet the notability criteria. Proposed deletion and articles for deletion are the proper venues for deletion of articles that claim but do not meet notability criteria.

You would also do well to avoid calling edits "vandalism" simply because you don't agree with them. Please see WP:VAND for the definition of what vandalism actually is. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right to undo the edit if you wanted to keep it, but it is kind of a moot point. My removal of it was in absense of any need to respond because you were right. I had even already changed the deletion type, my use of it was because that was how the only article I have ever dealt with a deletion attempt was first handled (including a link to what I linked, with 0 reference at any point to the lower standard it actually required), so I copy and pasted it.Gloern (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

News

The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
{{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeast article edit[edit]

Previously you did not approve the addition of the following text to the "symbiosis" section of the yeast article, since I did not supply a source "The scarabeid beetle associated yeast, Spathaspora passalidarum represents another example of symbiosis. This is one of the few species of yeast that is able to efficiently ferment xylose, aiding in the digestion of plant cells walls in the beetle's digestive tract."

Here is the first peer reviewed article published about this yeast species:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0953756206002188?via%3Dihub

Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzmokry (talk • contribs) 14:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Dzmokry (talk) 20:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Kritzman and AfD process[edit]

Thanks for the process correction. I think I got it right this time. Appreciate the guidance. Calebu2 (talk) 02:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion Template Issue[edit]

I had to put the proposed deletion template there twice for List of California Diaries characters because for some reason when I put the first template in there was a "template error" message. When I put the same/duplicate template in (without removing the original one) the error message disappeared. You removed the duplicate yet the error message has not returned. Could you please explain why the error message appeared when I first put the template in yet disappeared when I put the second template (the same template) in? I am trying to figure out why this happened. TheBlackKitty (talk) 23:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBlackKitty: I can't really tell from looking through the history and I also can't tell which one was the "first" one you added and which was the "duplicate". My advice would be that in the future when you prod an article, use {{subst:proposed deletion|concern=Reason}}. I've seen issues pop up when people don't subst the template. Hope that helps. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; it does help. I will do this from now on. TheBlackKitty (talk) 13:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter November 2019[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 819 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evander Holyfield page edit request[edit]

Hi KuyaBriBri,

When you have a moment, can you please revisit my edit request on the Evander Holyfield page regarding adding an AGE column to the "Professional boxing record" section? I took the liberty to add what I'm asking for by modifying the source locally and pasting it into the our talk section of the page. Thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Evander_Holyfield

Keteague (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019[edit]

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Georgia (country)[edit]

Hello, I need help in editing politically incorrect sentences in Georgia (country) article.

- Consider changing 'the Germans' to 'the Wehrmacht' in the sentence 'During World War II, almost 700,000 Georgians fought in the Red Army against the Germans.' Alternatively, please delete the latter part of the sentence, i.e. "against the Germans".

- Consider deleting "and advance towards Berlin" in the sentence "They never reached Georgia, however, and almost 700,000 Georgians fought in the Red Army to repel the invaders and advance towards Berlin."

- Consider deleting "against the Germans" in the sentence "The Georgian uprising on Texel against the Germans was the last battle of the World War II."

Germany is an important partner and ally of Georgia and these kind of statements are not appropriate in the context of modern relationships between the two countries.

Thank you.

Regards,

Zaur Tsotsoria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsotsoria (talk • contribs) 09:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create a page?[edit]

Hi Kuyabribri, are you available for hire to create a page? If not can you tell us where we might find someone with the ability to produce a nice page on a local artist? You can email me directly at drawforfood@Hotmail.com. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voteivan206 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help![edit]

I'm still learning, constantly searching up the guidelines and processes. You recently helped on this the article, removing one of the tags I added. Could you help clarify to me about what I could've done differently, and what the removed tag was actually meant for? Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westinlohne (talk • contribs) 17:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to delete template[edit]

Hi there, thanks for undoing my proposed deletion on Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/International medical cases chart -- I wasn't aware you can't prod templates. What's the best way to get a content-free template like this deleted? Do I need to tfd it, or is there a speedier process? -- Johanna Liss (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Johanna Liss: You can check if it fits in one of the general or template speedy deletion criteria, otherwise it has to go to WP:TFD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Keep up the good work mate.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding page delete[edit]

As said by u i have used delete page request by user perviously i think i used this some one removed n gave me (prod) Kindly help me in getting this done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie063 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 World Series[edit]

Hi – a statement it appears you added to 2020 World Series (with this edit) has been removed, as it was factually incorrect: "Betts tied Babe Ruth (1921) for most stolen bases in a World Series game with two". What Betts did was actually a more arcane accomplishment: "Mookie Betts becomes the first player since Babe Ruth with a walk and two stolen bases in the same inning of a World Series game." per ESPN. The record for steals in a single World Series game is three, accomplished four times (source here). Dmoore5556 (talk) 03:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Dmoore5556: I did not add that claim; I only moved it from one paragraph to another and copy-edited it for grammar. Either way I agree with the removal based on your reasoning. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All good now, thanks! Dmoore5556 (talk) 18:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney's Paradise Pier Hotel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney's Paradise Pier Hotel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney's Paradise Pier Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Fortune Brands page deletion[edit]

Hi Kuyabribri, thank you for your help! Re: Fortune Brands and Fortune Brands Home & Security, I have followed best practices to the best of my knowledge to disclose conflicts of interest and update pages based on objective, publicly available information. The goal is simply for information to be current. The Fortune Brands page reflects outdated information about a company that no longer exists and has not for ten years. Several of the cited links are also broken The page is commonly confused with Fortune Brands Home & Security. What is the best way to delete or update the page so that Wikipedia readers land on the right company page (Fortune Brands Home & Scurity)? Thank you! RebekahL FBHS (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RebekahL FBHS: Hello. In general an article about a defunct company will not be deleted solely on the basis that it's defunct. There's also no consistent practice as to how to deal with similarly-named successor companies; for example, there are multiple articles on the different defunct and extant companies named Rolls-Royce, while the articles Montgomery Ward and Circuit City each have one article that discusses two unrelated companies of the same name in the same business. For now what I've done is place a navigational aid called a hatnote on top of the Fortune Brands article stating what that article is about and pointing users to the Fortune Brands Home & Security article if that's what they are seeking. This is common practice in the area of disambiguation, where there are two or more similarly-named articles on different topics. Hope that helps. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 02:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuyabribri:, thank you again for your help. The hatnote is helpful, but is there anything else that can be done? It's easy to miss. This page is what comes up at the top of our search results, ahead of Fortune Brands Home & Security, and it's misleading. Several of the sources are no longer accessible. We just want users to be able to find accurate, current information. Thank you. RebekahL FBHS (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RebekahL FBHS: I'm not sure what more you want. The Fortune Brands article clearly states that it's a defunct company. If you're concerned about Google/Bing/AskJeeves search results, that's not Wikipedia's concern nor is it mine. If it's Wikipedia search results you're concerned about, both articles comply with the Wikipedia Manual of Style and the disambiguation process I mentioned above. That said, you could try the requested move process. If you were to go that route I'd suggest moving Fortune Brands to Fortune Brands (1969–2011) and Fortune Brands Home & Security to Fortune Brands. But under that process the article(s) will only be moved if there is a consensus to do so. Alternatively, someone might propose another solution (e.g., having Fortune Brands be a disambiguation page with links to the two different articles at different titles like what comes up when you search Washington or Mercury). Hope that helps. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuyabribri:, thank you. I'll try the requested move option and see what happens. RebekahL FBHS (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

What did I do now? Stop being biased. Peter ParkerJSR108 (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Quotes on the historicity of Jesus" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Quotes on the historicity of Jesus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 19#Quotes on the historicity of Jesus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Newspaper in India[edit]

Hey there! I've made a few edits to the above mentioned section. Could you verify it? Thank you. Also I have included those which do not have a wikipedia article though they are very well known among the locals, particularly Nakkheeran and Murasoli, whose copies i've seen being circulated in small, local shops in my area.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

Hello Kuyabribri,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

User talk:Kuyabribri

Referee (association football)[edit]

Posted by Richey90211 (talk · contribs)[edit]

More about Joaquín Santiago[edit]

Black Socks Proposed Move[edit]

Seasonal Greets![edit]

For Unblocking[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShoWareCenterlogo.jpg[edit]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

New Page Reviewer granted[edit]

G6 and disambiguation pages[edit]

Twinkle barfed? Nah. I blame CATS.[edit]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

REGARDING Ryan Hurst (UK) Posted by GriffinKemp97 (talk · contribs)[edit]

FXCM - Article Slanted Towards Recentism[edit]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Re: Speedy Deletion (Canceled)[edit]

Speedy Deletion[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Gratitude[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Re: Removing a Prod template to Sarah Austin (Internet celebrity)[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Intel Z370[edit]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Re: Deprod: Croatian Youth Party[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Kuyabribri[edit]

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Reg page Kuldeep Pai[edit]

Radmin article reviewing[edit]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10[edit]

Jason Porter[edit]

Kenneth_A._Loparo[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Universal Soul[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Babe Ruth[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018[edit]

Stop and listen[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018[edit]

PROD/AfD mistake on San Antonio mayoral election, 2019[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018[edit]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Has Vijay (actor) article been compared to any hollywood actors like tom cruise lol why non neutrality tag if it's sourced??[edit]

Please refrain from vandalism[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019[edit]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Yeast article edit[edit]

Mark Kritzman and AfD process[edit]

Proposed Deletion Template Issue[edit]

New Page Review newsletter November 2019[edit]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Evander Holyfield page edit request[edit]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019[edit]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020[edit]

Georgia (country)[edit]

Create a page?[edit]

Thanks for the help![edit]

How to delete template[edit]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]

A kitten for you![edit]

Regarding page delete[edit]

2020 World Series[edit]

Nomination of Disney's Paradise Pier Hotel for deletion[edit]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]

Fortune Brands page deletion[edit]

Warning[edit]

"Quotes on the historicity of Jesus" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Edit to Newspaper in India[edit]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

Premium Membership