User talk:MacGyverMagic

This user may have left Wikipedia. MacGyverMagic has not edited Wikipedia since 2012 March 27. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Go Home     E-mail

——————————————— MY TALK PAGE ——————————————— Please post new messages at the bottom of this page and don't forget to give your message a heading. I will respond to messages on your talk page unless you ask me to do otherwise. My talk page is not the place for disputes that do not involve me. If you're discussing a content dispute, please use your own talk page or that of the article. Please report ongoing vandalism at Administrator intervention against vandalism, not to individual administrators like me. I'm happy to help with questions about editing. When I'm not available, please use the {{helpme}} template or ask at the help desk.

Archives     Write me

Hi there MGM!

I have a problem: I am trying to create a wiki page for the french band Admiral's Arms (www.myspace.com/admiralsarms).

They are huge in France and are going to be signed very shortly (negociations are underway). They have played with many Wikipedia worth bands, and their manager has his own page which is thouroughly complete (search: daniel davison).

It is frustrating as they are a big band, and cannot get their own page. Could you pelase help?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahonda (talk • contribs) 15:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the page: Dipesh. It did not fall under the criteria for the reasons that you stated it should be banned for. It is injust and should be resolved

M Jennings06 (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there MGM...

You chimed in on the initial AfD on [1] which dealt with the claim of being the first video blogger and excessive vandalism has brought it to the attention of the administrators, and it is up for deletion again. Since the initial AfD, I (the subject) was spotlighted on the GMA Network in the Philippines (links to video and webpage on the page) as well as been included in a book about video blogging (again, all links on the page). There have also been several more mentions online and radio interviews - and again, no one has disputed me being the first video blogger or even attempted a claim otherwise. However, the new AfD seems to again revolve around this claim. You had positive comments previously, and the events since the first AfD further cements your initial statements. I'd really appreciate you chiming in again as there are certainly differing opinions on what is deemed "verifiable" sources. One is actually using the argument that since the internet archives back in 2000 don't say "The Journey is the first video blog" that it can't be used as a source. The term video blog wasn't mainstream until 2004-2005, and certainly wasn't noteworthy until it became a movement. It doesn't make the first one any less notable. Anyway, please add in your two cents. There's more sources and proof on my claim then any page I can find involving blogs. Not sure why this is so hotly debated.

Thanks Adam4tvs (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there MGM- you left a comment I have no idea how to understand. Can you E-mail me properly instead of this incomprehensible wiki-language? How do I unblock this page (in English that a 'normal' person will understand? (g_belgraver@hotmail.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbelgraver (talk • contribs) 15:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGM - I'm wondering why the article "Nathalie Archangel" was deleted (apparently by you in 2009.) I'm a long time personal friend of hers. Please respond to me. Martinwill2 (talk) 08:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MGM - you emailed me that my page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Rice was going in the right direction, but you didn't answer the crucial question, does it have sufficient references etc to prevent it being deleted? I am keen to get the site looking pukka, but i am extremely anxious about this. James. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumgrant (talk • contribs) 09:21, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was wondering if you could translate the page Van der Vlist into Dutch. The company is based in Holland and has multiple offices there. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jburton.vdv (talk • contribs) 09:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Jburton.vdv (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i think you wanted a reminder to check on the existence of the 'remington high wall' gun as its on afd. --Brunk500 (talk) 14:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MGM!

I've been attempting to create the Roaring Lion (energy drink) page and need some help/support/clarification - if you could, would you mind reaching me by email? Rick@RLED.net

Thanks so much for your time & help!

-Rick Strobel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strobelmobile (talk • contribs) 19:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2024
Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune Humour: Letters from the editors Comix: Layout issue
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Archives
2004-2006 archives: Index
2007 archives: January | February | March | April | May | June-August | September-December
2008 archives: 1 | 2 | 3
2009-2010 archives: January | 2009-2010 | ...
2011 archives: 1
Misc.: 2005 B-day wishes
Template: Archiving template for long periods of archiving with protection

welcome McGyver! I hope you enjoy your stay at wikihotel and decide to stay forever! It's free!!! lol

Anyways, jokes aside, welcome and have a great time here, Im looking forward to reading your articles.

God bless you!

Sincerely yours, Antonio Energy Bunny Martin

Reflecks 18:42, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hey McGwyver: I found you in the Recent changes page, this page had a question mark, meaning that obviously no one had welcomes you yet. Youre only the second person in two years I get to welcome aboard. I myself was welcomed by Mav.

My main subjects here are boxing and airlines. But everyonce in a while, I wander off, such as when I wrote about Menudo or Arrowhead Water or Grand Theft Auto: Vice City or anything else Im a fan of.

Thanks for your message, and God bless you!

Sincerely yours, Antonio Bolthead Martin

PS: checking your user page, I thought you'd be interested in List of teen idols, I originated the page, feel free to update it as needed.

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mgm Hoover The Boston Globe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed you about the Cairns Post article you requested. Incidentally, is the "post new messages" link at the top of this talk page working ok? It is different to the "new section" tab.--Commander Keane (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mgm,

It's good to see you editing again (well, one edit...). Since you were the first to suggest I make DYKcheck compatible with Google Chrome, I thought I'd let you know that I made some compatibility tweaks a few months ago, and the script now runs fine on Chrome. Thanks for the suggestion! Shubinator (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As part of a project funded by the European Commission (QLectives), we are collecting and analysing data to study quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies in Wikipedia. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey.

The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at this URL. Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to get in touch.

Thanks for your help! --DarTar (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Angry German Kid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. macbookair3140 (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MacGyverMagic, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Seed hibernation, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:70.125.130.6. This has been done because the page is unquestionably a copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:70.125.130.6. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 70.125.130.6 (talk · contribs) 03:56, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tree shaping article has undergone a series of mayor changes in the last few days. Here is the page before and now Duff has now proposed to change the article's name from Tree shaping to Arborsculpture. If you are interested please come and comment on Talk:Tree shaping. I am contacting everyone who has edited about arborsculpture Blackash have a chat 08:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)== RfM on Tree shaping->Arborsculpture ==[reply]

Hello. You may want to ring in on the RfM survey at Tree shaping->Arborsculpture RfM at some point during the next seven days. Blackash have a chat 10:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to say hey. Hey! Drmies (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You still working much on Project Magic?Bddmagic (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article I started on ViiV Healthcare was speedily deleted earlier today on the grounds that the company isn't suitably notable enough. It's a company with revenues of over $1bn [2] and the rights to many of the currently available HIV therapies. I can't believe that it can be considered to be un-notable? Could you possibly help me out with this? Wikipediatastic (talk) 16:46, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Read this article in the Chronicle of Higher Education and was surprised Founders College with its curious short-lived history was not on Wikipedia. However, I see that it was deleted, according to its deletion log due to a lack of reliable sources. Do you think this source makes the now defunct college noteworthy again? Kristensson (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The source definitely helps, but notability is usually established by multiple reliable sources (as this seems to be). You could try contacting the journalist to see if she dug anything up to add to the interviews. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MacGyverMagic,

Recently an article I was working on was deleted. The title was "Dakon", I worked at that article till late at night gathering online resources and completing them and I simply forgot to save a copy of it. Can you please recover it so that I'll be able to save on my PC. I was advised to do so by Gilo1969, the guy who nominated it for deletion.

Thank you. (Dakon (talk) 11:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, I forgot something in my reply at helpdesk. I have added something that I missed in my previous reply. Please take a look. Thanks. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Well, let's just say I didn't have to spend too much time thinking about what to use as a hook... :-) GregorB (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodney Morison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Morison (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 13:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I was uncertain about what to do. Perhaps you might take a quick look at Dwight H. Perkins (disambiguation), Dwight H. Perkins (architect) and Dwight H. Perkins (economist)? --Tenmei (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a request for help on the Macula Risk page- the user tools are exasperating to say the least

if someone can/should feel like helping me, please let me know by E-mail (g_belgraver@hotmail.com), not this awful interface —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbelgraver (talk • contribs) 17:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MGM- Since someone has placed an arbitary block on the content of the Macula Risk page, how can I start creating a temporary page? Are you suggesting I use another day of work to build it from scratch? Who can place the Macula Risk page in some kind of 'static' pen so that I can take a look at what I had previously written?

I did not save my work in some kind of seperate file precisely because of the fact that once I was done, I could see what I had written, and had access to the source code on the page?

Also, if someone who is part of some kind of science editorial sub-board in wiki-land can please explain to me what elements of description of a genetic test and the different genetic markers in that test are the offending issue, that would be very much appreciated

I do not understand this police-state approach where someone is telling me I have done something wrong, and then proceeds to provide me all kind of unhelpful information, instead of just saying 'if you do this, then there are no problems'? The content I provided is unbiased and contains only references from academic publication.

GBelgraver —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbelgraver (talk • contribs) 13:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: This has been escalated to WP:ANI#Macula Risk -- John of Reading (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a user who participated in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 4#Category:Famous animals and subcats, you may be interested in a discussion related to this at Category talk:Individual animals#Recent Cfd moves. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mgm RD Leaves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. -- とある白い猫 ^chi? 01:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I am an archivist and historian of fringe scientists and would like to view the deleted page that was once here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Louis_Naudin. I would like to have the complete revision records from the start to the end and have a copy oof user Serpentdove's first creation of the article and the last edit to the Naudin article. Please save the pages and send them in a zipped ffolder to bbqngrill@gmail.com. Please don't talk to me on my talk page, I hate going to Wikipedia, no offense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthspotter (talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:A.B. Lucas Secondary School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MGM, time for my annual "hey". Hey! Drmies (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2298 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

im just trying to find my way in the world if you would like to contact me and have a conversation or give me what thoughts you have about this contact me @ www.youtube.com/freelovindaemcee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.254.197 (talk) 03:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.

For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop rap, would you mind commenting to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip pop as well? Dan56 (talk) 02:24, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed the deletion of the article "Interdimensional being" was attributed to you. You called it "patent nonsense". How can I read the deleted text? Thanks! Misty MH (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2298 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily! We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, TheSpecialUser TSU

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2298 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH! News Good article nominee 04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion AFCH script improvements 1.16 to 1.17 Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

• Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MacGyverMagic. I am here to request the unprotection of the page ZP Theart, which has been protected since 2009 due to several editors "unredirecting" it despite the lack of individual notability. Well, now that he has left DragonForce and started his own project, I believe we can create a separated article for him (as briefly discussed here), but first I need to have that page unprotected. Would that be possible? Thanks, Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 14:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, looking for a copy including ALL formatting and etc. etc. of the deleted page The Core Gamers. They are a national group that is in 3 sections of Canada; Vancouver Island, BC, Richmond, BC, and Greenwood, NS, however I guess I do not yet have enough outside references. I know that I have 19 Wing Comox BC that can be verified, and 14 Wing Greenwood, NS, and I have Comments about them in GottaCon's past and Dak-Kon's past as well that would; I would have thought; be enough references, however I don't have any newspaper articles or magazine articles about them yet. However it took me some 8 hours to do that entire write up and format it properly and get the references down properly so rather than have to start ALL OVER again I would greatly appreciate the original page with the formatting be emailed back to me if possible. If you could also tell me how I could keep the page about them up, I would greatly appreciate that as well.

Sincerely Netherdrake (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2298 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script! Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Beer: 'tis not the reason for the season, but who needs an excuse. Cheers, and happy retirement. Drmies (talk) 01:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jack Moule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Received via OTRS 2012121610007472 from the page subject - reason supplied - The page is out of date, there are no reliable sources to specifically provide the correct information, It has been vandalised in the past. Also outside of Wikipedia I have received some abuse and bullying for having it there. As I

have now moved on and to not compete so this is irrelevant to me now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:14, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bjørn Sagvolden was created today. It has been nominated for speedy deletion. The article's talk page has a link to a previous discussion where you have asked a question. Has my article answered your question? --Barnstar candidate school (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• It's salted now. Hey MGM, how you doing? Drmies (talk) 05:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that admins have deleted the Besam Yousef-page that I re-created, I didn't accually know that one other page about the subject had been up before. I understand that it was deleted due to the fact that there's already been a similar page up that also was deleted. So what should I do? There is an interest for a wiki-page about Besam Yousef, not just from my own part. Besam Yousef is currently fighting in the UFC and it would be nice to have a page linked when the name comes up in terms about results, record etc on other pages. And from what I'm concerned the page i wrote was legit, I don't know about the previous one but mine included all things other pages about MMA-fighters does, the facts were correct and I put in all the sources to the context. So tell me, what can I do to make this page stay available if I will create it again, if possible?

And I've understand that you could send me a copy of my deleted page, but I got backup on all of it.

--WhiteKelly (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 19:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you're a translator. A new translation tool has been implemented and is ready for usage. Could you please try it by translating any page with Internet Explorer, and then report here on bugzilla if you find something wrong? We don't have many Internet Explorer testers, so your help would be very valuable. I also think that you'll enjoy translating with this tool. Thank you very much, Nemo 09:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy days, MGM.

Drmies (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been more than a year--longer than most kittens last. Here's a beer for you. Proost, en het beste. Drmies (talk) 00:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you change my nick the Lazinka, in Lukas13?--Lazinka —Preceding undated comment added 10:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flarn2005-drawn.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 23:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mgm Paul L Kirk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fact of the Day has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KMF (talk) 04:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm four years since I left you a message. Hier is een geit--misschien heb je daar iets aan!

Drmies (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that Crawford expedition has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 25 May 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 25, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 23:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that, about a decade ago, Air Bud: Aussie Rules was nominated for deletion, and that the final consensus was to have the article redirected to Air Bud. Given that no reliable sources have even alluded to the film being considered by the scriptwriters at all, it probably is best to have Air Bud: Aussie Rules listed at Redirects for Discussion. 76.126.49.152 (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Air Bud: Aussie Rules. Since you had some involvement with the Air Bud: Aussie Rules redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 76.126.49.152 (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geen geit? Dan maar een bier. Gelukkig nieuwjaar! Drmies (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ripper victims has been nominated for merging with Template:Jack the Ripper. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UpdatedDYKNom has been nominated for merging with Template:UpdatedDYK. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 08:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dave Mustaine(musician) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Dave Mustaine(musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Virtual season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced dicdef

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Jesty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:BLP1E, no WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Pontificalibus 20:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Fort Vredeburg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, better files at c:Category:Fort Vredeburg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Move(band) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § The Move(band) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]