User talk:Mattchewbaca

Hey, would please participate in this discussion? Thank for your time. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 03:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your edit to this article seems very constructive, but I was wondering why you removed some of the original references template format and replaced it with inline citations. Dan56 (talk) 08:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've had issues in the past on some articles with the cite web and cite journal templates. Bots will come in and reverse the work parameter if it is de-italicised, and so I like to not use the templates anymore. Plus inline citations can be done just as fast and are more stealthy.

I was actually going to start a discussion on the talk page but I know that you are a major contributor to the article, so I will ask you here. How come there isn't a singles chart for the article? I think it would add to it. Also, I was noticing that the track listing and the personnel sections have some of the same info. What do you thing about taking the producer credit out of the track listing and just having it in the personnel section? Mattchewbaca (meow) 08:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About singles charts, I've been told before that if there are seperate articles for an album's singles, there's no need in duplicating the charts in the album's article. For the personnel section, I think Allmusic's Credits section for Late Registration should be adapted and replace the table. Dan56 (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, somebody obviously put a lot of work into that table and for it to just be taken down without a proper consensus I feel would not be right. The table is more detailed than the credits at Allmusic, but in my opinion, a better approach would be to hide the table with a collapse feature. As it is right now it does take up a lot of space and does make the article a little clunky. I think a collapse option is rightly justified, maybe even for the Accolade table as well. If so, I still feel that the Producer line should be removed from the Track listing. Your thoughts? Mattchewbaca (meow) 22:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about moving the producer and songwriting credits from the table to the track listing template, which is missing writing credits. I don't know about collapse for any of them, though. There shouldn't be a section with nothing but a hidden table. Dan56 (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at the table and imagining producer and songwriting credits not being there just seems like something would be missing. The Accolades table could be collapsed and placed just under the prose subsection of the same name. Maybe Personnel and Release history could be merged together, that way there won't be a section with just a collapsed table. Peer review of the article states that the ToC is too long and some sections should be merged. Everything in the Charts, sales and procession section aside from the procession table I feel should be bold-faced font instead of level 3 subheading. The reasons for that are, it would shrink the ToC as recommended, and it is compact enough to the point that level three subheadings are not necessary. Here is the view of the section if you click on the corresponding heading link. Also, I'll just assume that you are watching my talk page, and I won't leave anymore talkback tags on your page after this one. Mattchewbaca (meow) 23:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are your feelings on my latest proposals for the article? Mattchewbaca (meow) 22:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I think the only necessary change is removing the redundant writer/producer liners in the personnel table, and adding writing credits to the track listing template. Dan56 (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm trying to do is improve the article. That's why I took the time to track down refs and even archive some of them. If you don't want to aspire for a better overall product than I won't edit on your articles anymore. Mattchewbaca (meow) 22:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They're not mine, they are free to any constructive contributions by anyone. My previous comment is only one opinion. Dan56 (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm proposing a WikiProject Kanye West at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Kanye West. Would you mind taking the time to vote there? Put your name in the Support section if you think he deserves one.

Kanyewest1123 (talk) 08:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattchewbaca. You have new messages at Armadillopteryx's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Once more. Armadillopteryx^talk 04:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks! The repetitiveness was driving me crazy. Armadillopteryx^talk 04:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for the notice.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HowlingBellsIntoTheSky.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HowlingBellsTheLoudestEngine1.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howling Bells (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yellow (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heartstrings (Howling Bells album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Londoner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heartstrings (Howling Bells album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Londoner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattchewbaca. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattchewbaca. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattchewbaca. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]