User talk:Mungo Kitsch

Archives

Archive 1 (44 entries) April 17, 2007—December 19, 2008 Archive 2 (44 entries) January 1, 2009—February 26, 2010 Archive 3 (44 entries) March 8, 2010—October 19, 2010 Archive 4 (44 entries) October 27, 2010—May 30, 2011 Archive 5 (44 entries) June 1, 2011—January 2, 2012 Archive 6 (44 entries) January 5, 2012—August 27, 2012 Archive 7 (22 entries) August 28, 2012—January 1, 2013 Archive 8 (30 entries) January 10, 2013—August 10, 2013 Archive 9 (10 entries while retired) August 30, 2013—December 3, 2017

The article Kummitusjuna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Iankaikkinen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: Regarding both the pages Iankaikkinen and Kummitusjuna, I believe that both pages can be deleted or redirected. Yes, they both absolutely fall short of album and notability guidelines, in a way that is hard to rectify for either page. Thanks for bringing these to my attention. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I understand the comment on my talk page now. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the points in your essay regarding civility. There are some nasty, nasty small people in this world who greatly undermine integrity in whatever worlds they inhabit. safloytab Safloytab (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate your supportive words. If there's anything I can do to help on Wikipedia, you can let me know. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mungo Kitsch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mungo Kitsch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ever".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 03:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: I appreciate you letting me know. One thing I will say is that I did not move it to the draft space; another user must have. As you may see with my histories of recent created pages such as Anika Nilles, The Firefly (2015 film) and Serpentcult, I did not have them in any draft space before deciding to submit them (I incubated them in my sandbox), and doing so would go against my standard protocol of creating articles. Also, I am fine with your decision to speedy delete the page you brought to my attention, as I had no particular plans for it. Thanks. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Happy Editing. -- CptViraj (📧) 06:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danielle Stella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Stella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Endymion.12 (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the following first message was originally posted on User talk:Steam5. The thereafter responses were posted here.

Hi. I was wondering why you have, on a long-term basis, made so many minor tweaks of wording on the Alison Haislip page, such as this, this, this, and this, among many other examples. You have also reverted some of your own edits, as you did here.

I recognize and respect that there may be one or more reasons why you are doing them that I am not privy to. But many of them appear, to me, as test edits, which are not accepted by Wikipedia outside of sandbox spaces or one's own user page(s) (they might be acceptable on draft pages). Many of the edits come off to me as non-essential word tweaks with under 10 pixels of difference, which do not, in any great regard, change what is being stated. Your lack of explanation in edit summaries does not help, either.

Your Haislip edits show up quite often in my watchlist. If you were reverting vandalism or expanding content with references in tow, I would understand. But considering the nature of the edits, I opine that they have become distracting.

And since I may not be the best person to analyze this editing behavior, I hope you would not be offended if I sought outside opinion here. If I do, I will make sure you know what I post where, so that you can fairly weigh in on the matter.

Let me know what your answer is on this page.

All the best,

Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to Alison Haislip article (and apology)[edit]

Hi, the answer to editing is the correct sentencing and my mistakable edits by undoing for my previous version. Previously, I clean up vandalism from IP adresses into its previous version on some articles. Do not warn me on this and I never make disruptive edits or vandalism. Remember the administrator told me when I was upset "we're all in your computer screens". I will continue read the article before I edit and I sometimes change URL addresses into HTTPS for it's citation sources. I apologize an I will continue as a Wikipedian and I will read the article first before I edit. Today, I will take a 24 hour break while I send you my message to you. I will try to do better than that next time by read the article first before I edit. Thanks for your time. All the best. Steam5 (talk) 01:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you taking the time to respond, as well as for heeding my critique. With that said, I will continue to keep the Alison Haislip page on my watchlist, and will therefore monitor the situation furthermore. (I'm not sure if you know this, but I created the article back in 2008, and still have a special spot for it.) That's all from me, at this time. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Not every image needs a caption ... relatively few may be genuinely self-explanatory." Please reconsider. --Brogo13 (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brogo13: I appreciate your input. I am not accustomed to seeing pictures without captions, with the exception of album cover images in infoboxes. However, I will not insist on the fact that all should have captions, and I see the argument brought forth by the MoS page you linked. I am more than willing to reconsider on this point, and you can feel free to give me feedback anytime. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits on Drudkh. A lot of these articles have been subject to blanket removals of cited content and I've gotten really frustrated. Would you be willing to give your input on the issue of bands controversially labeled as NSBM? Link is here.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@3family6: I appreciate how you have started this conversation on the WikiProject Music page, and have let me know. I am typing up a response currently, but it's taking longer than I expected. I should be able to give the input in 18 to 24 hours from now. Cheers! Mungo Kitsch (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your input and for working out compromises on this issue. Can you take a look at Khors as well? It looks like the edit dispute is starting up all over again, despite the RfC, and I don't want to edit war. Thanks.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, this version of the page.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 22:50, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, @3family6. I can definitely look at the Khors page. While I am not overtly familiar with this band specifically, I can come and see what I can do for you and the page. Thanks. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 14:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, 3family6. I wanted to let you know that I did the one edit to the Khors page, but it was not relevant to the NSBM designation. I have not been hot on the page partially because I have a few real-life distractions, the main one right now being that I am geographically relocating this week. Once that all gets settled, though, I will give the Khors page and band a more fair look in the regard that you requested. Thanks. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, take your time!

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 23:59. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 21#23:59 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Shhhnotsoloud: I forgot to participate in the discussion that you brought to my attention, but I want to let you know that I agree with the consensus that did decide to retarget the redirect. Thanks for your efforts. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photo of Robert Johnson that resembles the cover of 'Six and Six' is this one. The composition looks practically identical to me, except for the guitar obviously. But I agree the point has no place in the article and you were right to zap it. --Viennese Waltz 08:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Viennese Waltz: You make a good point. I did come across that picture in my cursory image search, and while they are extremely similar, I was not sure of the encyclopedic value of those statements (unless if echoed, of course by one or more reliable sources).

I definitely appreciate your feedback, and I do appreciate that you are watching/monitoring the Six and Six page. My intentions are to contribute to, and put on my watchlist, more Jandek-related pages, because he is a musician that strongly inspires me and my ethos toward music. I like to think that he is more "punk" than most actual punk rockers! Let me know if you need anything Wiki-wise. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twilight of the Thunder God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvus Corax. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anathema (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 Arena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Köld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Köld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elli (talk | contribs) 12:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question of 13 years ago at Talk:Miyuki Ishikawa. Cheers. Viator Liber (talk) 05:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Emily Goss at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 13:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Voices in My Head (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not enough reliable sources (allmusic being the only one)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikonmina (talk) 08:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voices in My Head (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voices in My Head (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sikonmina (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

. 2409:4042:4C1B:4AB0:0:0:B6CA:C001 (talk) 15:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2409:4042:4C1B:4AB0:0:0:B6CA:C001: Respectfully, I do not know what you are referencing. If you link the specific building you are talking about, either an internal link to a Wikipedia page or an external link to another website, then maybe we can meet eye-to-eye on something. But at present, I will not assume I know anything about this building.

And this is a very random message. I hope you can find whatever you're looking for; and, if you give more specificity, let me know if I can be of any help. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing my guestbook. I also wish you all the best in your endeavours. Happy editing and hope you will stick around Volten001 ^☎ 15:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Volten001: No problem, same to you. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 00:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Women's National Basketball Association career steals leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natasha Howard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bill Herman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chuck Connors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You claim you edited the article to be “neutral” but your edit contains nothing but repulsive and now debunked claims of grooming and abuse made by Iron Eyes and Jumpjng Eagle, and you hid Chase’s own convictions.You are displaying a massive bias, whereas I edited the article to show Tokata’s justified rebuttal of her father’s media extortion scam. You failed to mention the court was a tribal court with no jurisdiction over Ezra Miller, you made it sound like a trial, which it wasn’t. Chase never reported his false claims to any federal authority, so why did you remove my efit stating this fact? You’re trying to give chase immunity from scrutiny, and misinform the public, but wikipedia is supposed to be neutral. I know the people involved in the Ezra Miller tabloid saga, and publishing only Chase’s slander is libellous. RedEyeKav (talk) 12:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]