User talk:STATicVapor

This user may have left Wikipedia. STATicVapor has not edited Wikipedia since 26 September 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Please leave a new message.

In order to keep a conversation together, rather than spread over multiple talk pages, if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. I will also always ping you along with my responses.

Archives

Archive I Archive II Archive III Archive IV Archive V Archive VI Archive VII

is it possible to contact you to create a wiki page for me

WWE: Uncaged VIII ARTICLE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DELETED ITS A GOOD READ.?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmm134 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	100,000th edit award
	Let me be the first to congratulate you on your 100,000th edit! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your bling page! or you could choose to display the {{User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thanks for all your work at the 'pedia! Cheers, — MarnetteD|Talk 04:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: Well thanks for the kind message, I didn't think anyone would notice lol. StaticVapor message me! 05:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! I will see you in that club in 3000 edits :-). - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 13:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Galatz: You got this Galatz, you're almost there lol. StaticVapor message me! 18:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

haha thanks...10 years in the making - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 19:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome S. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Belated congrats. Nice to see that star I designed going to a nice home. Vjmlhds (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about the earlier edit, added in a more comprehensive version with proper citations. CashLizard (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Cashlizard[reply]

@CashLizard: Thank you for doing that :) StaticVapor message me! 21:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relax lol. It was a good edition I just didn’t have time to source at that precise moment... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoglundan (talk • contribs) 21:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoglundan: I am very relaxed tbh. Refer to WP:BURDEN, WP:BLP and WP:V. StaticVapor message me! 21:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert me edit to Bill Goldberg? Jimmyy68 (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimmyy68: When you add or change content on Wikipedia you need to cite a reliable source for you change. Please click all the blue links in the message I sent you. Outside of that I feel no reason to say the exact match time, it is trivial. StaticVapor message me! 18:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know, in your haste to put Maverick back as "other personnel", you put Elias back as 24/7 Champion - yet you said I put in incorrect information.

Gotta watch before you leap, sir.

Vjmlhds (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vjmlhds: This moving of Maverick was directly against consensus from the article talk page. You already got a final warning since you returned, if I wanted ANI is that way, but I am just not active enough rn to bother. There was consensus. I don't know how winning the joke 24/7HardcoreIronmanHeavyweight championship a few more times means anything. You labeled Maverick as a 205 wrestler and that is not correct. Sorry about my mistake with Elias, did not see that until now. StaticVapor message me! 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello what is a redlik that you mention in my talk page

@Andrewboricua787407: See WP:REDLINK There are blue links and red links. You should not remove red links unless you know that, that person or thing is not and will not ever be notable. Also you only need to sign your posts at the end of your posts on WP:TALK pages. StaticVapor message me! 08:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.mandatory.com/wrestlezone/news/1117371-get-to-know-guest-wwe-pc-coach-pat-buck

https://thepopbreak.com/2019/04/03/pat-buck-on-the-buzz-killer-the-future-of-wrestling-the-duality-of-being-a-promoter-a-wrestler/#

https://rajah.com/node/notes-impacts-code-red-event-two-new-producers-former-nxt-star-spotted

I would of quoted all of this but don’t know how, if you can help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChipDouglas820 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ChipDouglas820: Thanks for the effort I do appreciate it! A few things to link you to. First would be WP: Referencing for beginners and WP:CITE. Also of note, Mandatory and Rajah are known as unreliable sources, please only use reliable sources like the ones found at WP:PW/RS. All content needs to have a citation, the part I was more concerned about was the claim that he produced the match, is their a reliable source that you can find that information on? StaticVapor message me! 08:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me update my page? I can pay for it. ChipDouglas820 (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Static. I notice that on Sabu's page, you've given him the sub-heading "Second return to Impact, 2019-present" or words to that effect with a source indicating Impact are still going to use Sabu in future. Would you suggest that means Sabu should be added back to Impact's roster, or would you advise against it?

SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SkylerLovefist: I was iffy on it, only because "plans can change". Maybe wait till he returns, but I wouldn't revert it if you wanted to add him back. StaticVapor message me! 03:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since he's returned at today's taping, I'll add him back, I'll use both sources. Thanks.

While I'm at it, reports coming out from the tapings indicate Reno Scum have formalised their alliance with Ace Austin, whom they've been involved in an ongoing storyline with, along with Eddie Edwards. While no formal news of a contract has broken, they've been used a lot since Cali Combat and appear to being used going forward. Too Synth at this stage, or are they fair to be added too? SkylerLovefist (talk) 03:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SkylerLovefist: Oh cool that's awesome to hear, saves us the headache worrying about that. As for Reno I would wait for 1) roster profile 2) source confirming signing or 3) them being used at tapings outside of California/Nevada. They seem to only use them when it's convenient when they're touring in the area. StaticVapor message me! 07:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair call. Perhaps if they appear at the next tapings, still allied with Ace?SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SkylerLovefist: Yeah that would seem okay, as long as the taping isn't in Nevada/California, where Reno Scum is from lol. Also I just saw this. You could add Paul London and Chris Sabin to the backstage section as producers based off this since they have worked previous tapings as producers as well. StaticVapor message me! 23:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the next tapings are in Canada, so pretty far from that area. Lol. I'll chuck Paul and Chris in when I have the chance. SkylerLovefist (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, editing tables at all is a nightmare on my browser. I just wish Impact frequently updated their roster page so everyone didn't have to always play the wait/guess game. StaticVapor message me! 03:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki cross does Indeed perform under the smack down brand as she is currently smackdown tag champ with alexa bliss you should watch it and then you'll see Kintobor86 (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kintobor86: You must be misunderstanding something. They are not the SmackDown Tag Team Champions. That title is held by The New Day. StaticVapor message me! 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

if you check the women's division also have tag champs alexa bliss and nikki cross are champs in their first reign — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kintobor86 (talk • contribs)

@Kintobor86: The women's tag team championships are dual brand championships. The champions can appear on both brands. Bliss and Cross are still Raw superstars though. StaticVapor message me! 22:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I edited the weight of #REDIRECT Braun Strowman I did cite a reliable source, a recent interview in which Adam Scherr (Braun Strowman) said that his weight was 345-350 lbs, all you had to do was go to that video at the point of the video which I specified and hear it. So you're wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But since you want a 'billed' weight, I added the correct billed weight for Braun Strowman. 385lbs, not 340lbs. I also provided a reliable source for it. So don't send me another message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vannyvis55: I am clearly not "wrong", the section of the infobox does say billed weight. I saw someone else reverted it. Weird that they announced him at 385 when they said he was 340 in June. I have my doubts that his weight fluctuates that much. StaticVapor message me! 12:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strowman's billed weight has always been 385lbs. Look at wwe.com, watch RAW every Monday night, they say 385lbs. And yes his weight does flucuate, Strowman has comfirmed that his own weight fluctuates 10-15bs per DAY (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LISn6eOwlIw) (Point 4:25). Super ShowDown was in June, three months ago, and the only show in which they said he was 340. Even if his weight was 340lbs then, it is possible for him to gain 45 lbs during that time period of three months. It doesn't matter if you 'have doubts'. It's a fact. With that being said, I have edited the page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vannyvis55: A few comments on your editing. 1) I sent you a message to teach you how to sign your posts on talk pages, please do that. 2) Even if you think you are right, do not ever edit war, it is the quickest way to a block. As for this dispute, I saw the video and they clearly do announce him as 385 still so I will leave it alone. In the future, if someone reverts you, (especially if two people do!) discuss on the article talk page and reach consensus before restoring your preferred version. Even if you are "right" it is still edit warring.StaticVapor message me! 14:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I initially reverted Vannyvis55's edit since the channel is not verified. However I've restored it to their version, for now. Someone need to update it with a video from a verified source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: We might as well use the wwe.com profile as the source since it says the same thing as the YouTube video. I was the one who originally changed it to 340 due to the Super ShowDown video, but it appears they reverted back to the heavier weight. StaticVapor message me! 15:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem. If I remember correctly, you and someone else agreed upon that recent sources are better. Since I kinda agreed to it, I was enforcing this. We can always change it back to WWE.com official profile since Brawn is still associated with the company and his profile is likely up-to-date. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: What's sad is that don't really update their website listings. That is the only reason I jumped to make the 340 change when I saw it updated somewhere else. For example, Gulak has apparently been billed at 203 and I just watched a clip from Extreme Rules (he is billed at 202), but he is still 193 on wwe.com and on our article for him. StaticVapor message me! 17:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's kinda problematic. Do you want me to re add the YT video, since it is from August 26? I mean both the WWE source and the YT video. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like leaving the YouTube ref out is best since it is a copy vio of WWE television. It was good as proof, but we now know that the .com is accurate to what they say on their show. StaticVapor message me! 19:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, STATicVapor! I apologize for not explicitly referencing the specific MOS guidelines in my edit summary.

Per MOS:1STOCC (i.e. When an abbreviation will be used in an article, first introduce it using the full expression . . .), I believe if the company name is referenced repeatedly in the lead section, then it is important to annotate the abbreviation. However, if the first introduction of the name is its only presence in the lead, then I personally believe the abbreviation should wait until the body because it will be even more confusing to introduce a section specifically devoted to AEW and not introduce the abbreviation (e.g. "Omega signed with All Elite Wrestling. He made his debut for AEW on . . ."). I believe this is in line with MOS:INTRO (i.e. Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article . . .) in that an abbreviation is overly specific for only one mention in the lead.

MOS:FIRST references abbreviations in the first sentence of the article, but it illustrates the same scenario where the abbreviation is utilized multiple times in the lead.

That said, there's not a definitive guideline, so I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on this. KyleJoan^talk 20:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan: Make sense to me thanks for the links :). I was honestly really just looking for information after I had saw someone recently add the abbreviations to a bunch of leads. StaticVapor message me! 08:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! Generally, I find that professional wrestlers’ article leads are either too brief or too elaborate. Omega’s is a good length, in my opinion. KyleJoan^talk 10:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read the PW/SG thing and no where does it say that people on the same amount of days but have more reigns are ranked higher and if you look at other articles that have combined reigns you will see that people with the same amount of days are ranked equally regardless of number of reigns. Browndog91 (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Browndog91: According to WP:PW/SG it should be sorted as "If two or more wrestlers are tied in days, priority is given in this order: most reigns, most successful defenses, alphabetical." You will find more discussion on Talk: List of WWE 24/7 Champions. StaticVapor message me! 20:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made a new section in Talk: List of WWE 24/7 Champions please comment. Browndog91 (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rush was a face last night. Why would he be facing heel Oney Lorcan to face heel Gulak? Last time I checked they don’t do heel vs. heel. Rush is a face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebelrick123 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebelrick123: Wikipedia does not accept assumptions based on events. Citations to reliable sources must be provided for face/heel turns. Anyways Oney is a babyface so I don't even know what else to say. StaticVapor message me! 17:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Humberto Carillo edit, I apologize for not using proper citations I had simply forgotten to add them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KallaroKay (talk • contribs) 21:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KallaroKay: No worries the message was mainly to teach you how, if you did not know how to. Also remember to sign your posts when you post on user or article talk pages. Thanks and happy editing. StaticVapor message me! 22:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StatVap, and thanks for your message. I've asked for assistance here. Pete "why is the part of my brain that should remember where I left my wallet and car keys yesterday instead a concise history of Western visual art from 1850 to 1950?" AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dedicating time to this @Shirt58:. I appreciate it. StaticVapor message me! 21:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, always happy to help out. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 13:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Я си еби майката ве урод! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vzehasinami (talk • contribs) 12:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologize for claiming that Bryan turned face without proof backing it up. I promise not to do that again. MaxRocker264 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Gable is a face. He’s been a face for weeks now. Watch the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebelrick123 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebelrick123: I am aware. However, that sort of stuff is always up to opinion. So when you add face/heel turns you have to cite a source. Also WP:SIGN your talk page posts. StaticVapor message me! 22:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's true, he's right, Chad Gable did recently announce he did say he wanted people to refer to him as Shorty Gable, as it was directly coming from Mr. McMahon himself when he, Mr. McMahon, said directly that he wanted Chad Gable to come up with a new ring name and actually legitimately made fun of Chad Gable over Chad Gable 's height. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 21:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just wanted to say that you missed the second episode of Ridiculousness he was on. Season 13 Episode 11 Machine Gun Kelly IIMadderzzzzz (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At the 2019 Hell in a Cell PPV, King Corbin dubbed Chad Gable as “Shorty Gable” and after Gable won he was announced as “Shorty Gable”. People have been making edits on Gable’s Wikipedia page adding the name, claimimg that since it was announced it is a ringname. KallaroKay (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KallaroKay: Sorry I was largly gone for over a week. In case of disputes I would suggest taking discussion to the article talk page or WT:PW. I haven't reviewed the article yet, but it appears a discussion was started in the article talk page. What a dumb name change though. StaticVapor message me! 22:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recently edited Charlotte's article because I thought she turned heel when she elbowed Becky Lynch last night on RAW

Not long after, some user deleted my edit

@HassanTheScumbob: Do you have a source for face/heel turns? A reliable source is required. StaticVapor message me! 18:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found one on Smarkoutmoment's list of heel and face turns. Is it okay if I post the link HassanTheScumbob (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@HassanTheScumbob: You will find a list of reliable and unreliable sources at WP:PW/RS. Smarkoutmoment would not qualify as a reliable source. StaticVapor message me! 22:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear STATic Vapor, I will put references for articles relating wrestlers. Please let me know when I make a reference if ti's great. Also if its read or something you can edit it. Kingzwest (talk) 02:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From, Kingzwest

@Kingzwest: Hey why did you add unsourced content to Dusty Rhodes (wrestler), Kamala (wrestler) and Junkyard Dog following this message? StaticVapor message me! 07:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's not, everybody knows Triple H did wrestle in 1991 and 1994,under Terra Ryzin' he says December 11, 1998 when he asked Owen Hart a question and Owen asked why he never went back to WCW and he brought it up when he said what he said about hating someone for throwing Alex Wright under the bus about something from the night before the night before his, Triple H 's ONLY ONLY WCW match — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, Much Love as a friend, It's true on Triple H [[Telley~~]] (talk) 06:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, Hi, Much Love as a friend, On The Rock, it really is true that The Rock actually, no lie, no joke, did appear that day on The Kelly Clarkson show in August, as You see, the week before, I kid you not, and it repeats again the day before, Kevin Hart was supposed to appear on The Kelly Clarkson show and due to his, Kevin Hart 's accident, he Texted The Rock himself and The Rock actually legitimately offered to fill in for Kevin Hart and ended up appearing on The Kelly Clarkson show, Ellen DeGenres herself vouched for it the day he also appeared on her, Ellen DeGenere's show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 21:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you removed it, do I need to add where the videos come from? I think I already said that they are at the end of the you don't understand videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by X43C (talk • contribs) 17:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi STATicVapor, please look into the constant vandalism by @Fredericknapoleon005: on Jay-Z. Isaacsorry (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Much Love as a friend, It's true, Ric Flair really was always called "Ramblin' " Ric Rhodes, Tully Blanchard said as did Harley Race May 10, 1984. Telley~~ (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs)

Hi Much Love as a friend, It really is true on Ric Flair, "That 70s Guy" Mike Awesome said May 4 1991 and repeated in November 1998 on Nitro when he accidentally called Glacier by his real name before a match and brought it up when he makes a joke about The 4 Horsemen. [[Telley~~]] (talk) 03:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, Much Love as a friend, Do you have an Instagram account so I can show you something on The Rock? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 01:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know what this post or edit was for roman that i did. I can not recall anything that i posted. And because of that someone might have used my name for the post. And now i cant do anything on wiki. So please enlighten me on this edit please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:B40A:B900:B43F:D31E:67DB:3E4A (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Hello,

I re-edited the entry you noted with the credited songwriters listed here:

https://open.spotify.com/track/4Tk9QvtwwOj2Ah9E8ahutZ?si=nfbqz4qaQrmSOqqKeOmUyQ

Please let me know if there's anything else you need.

Thanks, Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realstacktrace (talk • contribs) 20:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Realstacktrace (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)01/19/2020[reply]

Hey there, STATicVapor! I hope you've been well. I remember we had a discussion regarding the use of abbreviations in professional wrestling BLP lead sections, specifically over at the Kenny Omega article. I'm now writing because I wanted to get your take on an active RfC on the article's talk page regarding its lead section. I'm really curious about your view on the matter, so if you would like to state it to help the discussion, it would be highly appreciated. Cheers! KyleJoan^talk 18:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How you doing im a artist trying to get a wikapedia page made. i have several google news articles and a real fanbase. I also have a newspaper article being written by my hometown covering my story as we speak. I have over a million plays across all platforms and I have 15 thousand instagram followers and with in that 200+ are verified users.Ive worked with grammy award winning and platinum producers and have a real story even before my success in music.

https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNQykFakOpZVUv50Q4m3LutO8DOJVQ%3A1580922774221&source=hp&ei=lvc6Xu2TC-zr_Qaoqp-IDg&q=shay+bxxgie&oq=&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.35i362i39l10.0.0..58534...10.0..0.0.0.......0......gws-wiz.....10.ytnB_bOVJTE#kpfb-kpid=_0fc6XpH_D-qm_QbU_I7YAQ11

Above is my google search link were i have a creditable google knowledge panel and all my music. if you could give me a reply on how i can get this done id be very grateful. My artist name is "Shay Bxxgie". Website- shaybxxgie.com .Social media @shaybxxgie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaybxxgie (talk • contribs) 18:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey, StaticVapor, this one is a bit weird, but I'd like your help with something. There's a user who keeps making unhelpful alterations to the List of Impact Wrestling Personnel page, specifically attempting to remove Bhupinder Singh every 2 or 3 months with no source outside of "I haven't seen him wrestle on TV." Now, Bhupinder is still there, in training, and I'm beginning to get extremely frustrated with this user's edits. What would the best course of action be in regards to getting this ongoing issue resolved? I'm coming to you simply because I know you're an experienced user especially when it comes to professional wrestling articles, so I figured I'd ask rather than have it become uncivil and so on. SkylerLovefist (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before sending your malicious messages, first check the edit date and then rate me "vandalism", it is not the first time that you do it without checking the MLW webpage, the MLW roster page is very very active, only in this case you can check my edition date April 3rd, and you just now April 14th waited for Salina to return to the roster to send me your message of bad coexistence on wikipedia. I never edit "unsupported" or "vandalism" as you imply without proof, look here https://web.archive.org/web/20200402001141/https://mlw.com/fighters/MLW April 2nd, where is Salina? if you didnt know MLW in some cases works by dates so before claiming, verify and do it in time that the one that is very bad position is you.

User:FranXBSCUser talk:FranXBSC

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bot removed the scoreboard for how many wins NXT and AEW had in the 18-49 demographic. Can you get somebody to put it back or is it too unnecessary to do so HassanTheScumbob (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How are you mate?

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Good! Unfortunately probably will not be editing much or at all for the near future. Appreciate the thoughts though, truely hope all is well with you! StaticVapor message me! 00:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. I was out for 4 months, April to August. Was unwell, then got busy. Hope everything is well with you too! - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey !

I want to bring it to your concern that I have been editing the page "Damian Priest" by updating the article and citing all the relevant sources every week. This helps in maintaining its continuity. I was doing this for around 8 months and I have welcomed all the corrections and edits.

However, today out of nowhere, the user User:Etacarinaee has removed most of the content that I have updated every week.

This user has a record of removing information from other biographies as well, and inspite of the warnings, the user continues to do so, without any relevant explanation.

You understand that doing this every week takes consistency and patience to jot down every detail to make pages more informative. Please check Damian Priest page's edit history.^[1] If the edit made by User:Etacarinaee is justified (though I still am not convinced), please let me know what is wrong. I would humbly welcome constructive criticism.

Thanking You.

User:NautiyalSiddharth98 NautiyalSiddharth98 (talk) 10:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NautiyalSiddharth98, I'll take the liberty of replying in STATicVapor's stead. For a start, I'm not in favour of Etacarinaee's large removal of sourced content, so you have my support on this matter. However, I'm not fully against Etacarinaee's concerns. His/her main point, which I agree with, is that the article was overly detailed, which is generally discouraged in encyclopedias. I wouldn't remove as much content as she did though. You might find it helpful to read Wikipedia:Too_much_detail. The article has evolved quite a bit since you sent this message; did you manage to reinstate content that Etacarinaee had removed? If you need anything, feel free to contact me. Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 06:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NautiyalSiddharth98: Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help. If I choose to edit in the future, this page is in my watchlist so I will see it. StaticVapor message me! 00:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear STATicVapor,

I'm writing to you because you have contributed to The Mighty Don't Kneel and Melbourne City Wrestling.

I'd like to ask for your help in related articles.

I'm anticipating that my latest edit in Hartley Jackson and The Mighty Don't Kneel will be continuously reverted by a certain someone.

If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could assess the situation and verify if their reverts are legitimate.
If you think they are not, please boldly revert their reverts (in The Mighty Don't Kneel too).

Here's the whole story, if you would like:

The thing is, Jammo85 states that Hartley Jackson was a member of the group The Mighty Don't Kneel, and has added this information to the respective articles.
However, Addicted4517 reverted their edits here + here, and here.

By the time of the AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hartley_Jackson_(3rd_nomination), I was uninvolved with these articles. But I researched the topic and concluded that Jammo's sources were sufficient, so I selectively reverted Addicted's revert of Jammo's edit (here).
Addicted reverted my revert here.

The discussion went on the AfD itself.
Addicted's main complaint was the reliability of the sources.
With some effort I have collected many sources, including official ones here and here (they are archived, so takes some time to load), that mention Hartley being part of TMDK. The full list of sources I collected will go as footnotes: ^{[2][3][4][5][6]}.

Addicted was not satisfied, and reverted my edits again here and here.

Best, Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 06:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Walwal20: Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help look in to this. If I do I will try to take time to look into the issue that is Australian wrestling articles. StaticVapor message me! 00:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

I have given you credit on the nominations page; care to leave any comments? --K. Peake 08:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Do you remember what information was newly available when you did this? Yappy2bhere (talk) 00:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m curious as to if you would consider creating a Wikipedia page for a artist. And if so what info would you need provided, and any fees associated. 71.114.61.206 (talk) 20:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello STATicVapor,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Category:Singlechart usages for Flanders Urban has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I know this was a really long time ago, but you started this RFC. Then there was a second one, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe (2nd nomination). The article has been created again. I'm not sure how much new material can be added about a teenager who died several years ago. I'm wondering if the article has been improved to the point of notability. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve edited this disambiguation page to remove any reference to Ruth Etting. I’ve found no reference in any google search to associate her with the popular 1931 song. The song’s Wikipedia article doesn’t mention her, and her own Wikipedia article doesn’t mention the song. If you can provide a reliable reference to revert my edit, please do. If not, I regret that Wikipedia’s rules of civility prevent me from finishing this communique properly. Tapered (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Funk Volume has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

आपके लेख भारत आदिवासी पार्टी में अध्यक्ष, महासचिव, कोषाध्यक्ष का लेख add करे 2409:4052:D8A:7FC4:14AD:5C6F:5B18:6B33 (talk) 08:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]