User talk:Shortride

Archives

2006 - 2009 2010 - 2013 2014 - 2017 2018 - 2019

Hi Shortride, I saw you added Santa Lucia Preserve as an unincorporated area of Monterey County. I'd looked into this prior but couldn't determine if it were actually the case. Do you have a source? Thanks!

Rosenbergwrite (talk) 23:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's been more than a decade, but there's some talk about an aspect of the Pennzoil article. Your edit changed the original company's origin to Los Angeles, but without citation. There's nothing online that can confirm this as their origin, nor can contradict it, either. Do you happen to recall where you definitively determined Los Angeles?      — BoringJim (talk) 07:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walden, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TFH Publications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neptune, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Discount Beverage Outlet. Since you had some involvement with the Discount Beverage Outlet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Growing a Greener World. Since you had some involvement with the Growing a Greener World redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nob Hill Foods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crane School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane Elementary School District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dispatch Printing Company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 06:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mapleton Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dix Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wolfhouse Radio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lost Coast Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eureka Broadcasting has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wrapports has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shortride,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Calistoga Tribune, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect North Carolina Historical Review. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 3#North Carolina Historical Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Le Livre de Poche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hachette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SouthComm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back on 1 July 2011, you added the store count of "1,280" to Save-A-Lot. I know this was back nearly a decade ago, but I'm wondering if you still recall where you got that information from. I ask because, in the process of making a footprint map, I've only found 984 locations, according to their store locator. (I'm more inclined to believe they're missing stores from their locator, than to think they've lost 296 stores in that time - but I'd like to make sure.) Thank you.        —  BoringJim (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I got the information from the SuperValu website, since Save-A-Lot was owned by them at the time. --Shortride (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RTL Group has been nominated for merging with Template:Bertelsmann. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 17:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luxury Resorts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly-sourced short stub on non-notable company

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Best Boy (film)

added a link pointing to Commonweal

Colin Westerbeck

added a link pointing to Commonweal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New York NOW. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 7#New York NOW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Fraternal Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCU.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 10Best.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#10Best.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Reinhold Publishing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious about your redirect for Feet in 2 Worlds (from September 2020). How is this connected with the Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment? I think Feet in 2 Worlds is a podcast, but the website about the Milano school makes no mention of it. Am I missing something? --DaffodilOcean (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feet in 2 Worlds was a media organization based at the Milano School but it appears to have just spun off as an independent nonprofit.--Shortride (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should that be mentioned in the page for the Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment, or in The New School page? I am not familiar with Feet in 2 Worlds or the school, so I am not sure what makes the most sense. --DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alive from Off Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GBH.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you created the redirect for Ankerwycke to the American Bar Association. Someone has asked a question about it at Talk:American Bar Association so I'm bringing it to your attention. Thanks! Marquardtika (talk) 13:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Fe Springs, California, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metrolink and Norwalk Transit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Diego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jitney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CatholicMom.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#CatholicMom.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shortride. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American General, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spenard Builders Supply and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Spenard Builders Supply until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adding junctions to California county routes in zone G. weeklyd3 (block | talk | contributions) 15:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Melanie Kroupa Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails MOS:DABMENTION: this imprint is not mentioned at any of these targets. I wouldn't even know where to redirect. Imprint doesn't appear to be notable - proposing deletion instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Merloyd Lawrence Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails MOS:DABMENTION: this imprint is not mentioned at any of these targets. I wouldn't even know where to redirect. Imprint doesn't appear to be notable - proposing deletion instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pilgrim Press, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect United Bank of Arizona and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 10#United Bank of Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MNI – Market News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MNI – Market News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(posted on behalf of nominator, User:Hollytrinity.) Storchy (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Huntington Beach Independent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a former local newspaper. Searching found some coverage of the sale of it's owner, Orange Coast Publishing Co., in 1988 and non-independent coverage by Los Angeles Times in 2003. No significant independent coverage of the newspaper itself was found. Fails general notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 14:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greyhound tracks in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nate • (chatter) 02:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Shortride,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Advanced Bionics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Bionics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Catholic Health East requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/43121-80 and https://www.cbinsights.com/company/catholic-health-east. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mike1901 (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Catholic Answer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 1 § The Catholic Answer until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two quick points to elaborate on my last edit summary:

• First, we need a source. The Google Street View imagery for the three exits from February, March, May 2023, respectively, does not show any destinations at those exits, just the road names. We don't have a way to verify that the signs have been changed until Google drives through ggain and captures new images. I-8 is a featured article, so verification is a priority.
• Second, we don't include destinations not present on the main guide sign at an exit in that fashion.
  • If the "big green sign" (BGS) with the exit number at the exit has those destinations, we'd include them in the destinations column.
  • Instead, if there is supplemental signage listing them, signage separate from the BGSs at the exit, says a "Viejas Reservation Exit 33", then that could be listed in the notes for the exit, "Also access to Viejas Reservation" or the like.

Imzadi 1979 → 20:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Oracle Press has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § Oracle Press until a consensus is reached. Paul_012 (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Agra-net.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 24 § Agra-net.com until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shortride. Thank you for your work on RSG Group. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shortride

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pichpich and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Graphix, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 25 § Graphix.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pichpich}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pichpich (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CTS is looking for an editor… we could use your skills. Gocovenant.com dr will Ryan 72.135.50.161 (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Beckett Theater has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § Beckett Theater until a consensus is reached. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Entertainment Rights into Where's Wally?. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shortride, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Anthology Editions, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthology Editions.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you added quite a bit of content to the KIDS Magazine (1970s Magazine) entry on Wikipedia a few years ago. I bought this as a kid and loved it, and I own issues 1 - 21 and 23. Do you happen to know what the final issue was? I'm trying to collect the rest but don't know when it ended! Thanks for any info you may have! Keithgreenfan (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Make Me A World has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Make Me A World until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hubert’s Lemonade has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Hubert’s Lemonade until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]