User talk:Spanneraol

Archives

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.

They just keep ranting over Picard on the show’s talkpage and regurgitating, whinging about propaganda. I’d be willing to close the topic if you are.--CreecregofLife (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine.. wasn't going anywhere.. I really don't understand his comment about segregation... he's probably one of those people upset there aren't more straight white males on the show.. but that doesn't make it segregation. Spanneraol (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Florida Complex League Tigers West roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joeykai (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spanneraol. Since you undo-ed my edit on the New York Yankees article, I have to clarify with a question to ask you. Since the Yankees won against the Red Sox today, MLB stated that they clinched the postseason spot for the 2022 season, but does that mean they claimed the American League East division title of 2022? I did a quick edit for it after realizing they won and clinched the postseason spot. --Allen ^{(talk / ctrb)} 03:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They clinched a postseason spot but they have not yet clinched the division title. They could still wind up as a wild card team.. Their number for clinching the east is six games. Spanneraol (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you reverted my tagging of Mesa_Solar_Sox here indicating link is in the template, but where is, it is not obvious. Also the 2 links, Roster and Transactions in the template are dead. Keith D (talk) 19:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The roster link in the template has been fixed. Spanneraol (talk) 22:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sam Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsure if this is notable enough for this baseballer to have an article based on the date of career and the absense of sources. The content is also just one sentence and two external links.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Field is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Field until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes, this time there is a new page for discussing rather than just a tag. Must have done it wrong first time. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyman Drake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyman Drake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WPscatter ^t/_c 18:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your edits on the 2022 postseason, espically right after game 6 finished! Cherrell410 (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1875 National Association standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1874 National Association standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1873 National Association standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1872 National Association standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1871 National Association standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:National Associations standings templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Great Falls Smelter City players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jacona (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spanneraol, I'd like to explain my undo of your edit. The cited AP source says The challenge filed in Maricopa County Superior Court also alleges hundreds of thousands of ballots were illegally cast, but there’s no evidence that’s true. That does back up that the allegations were baseless, but it does not satisfy your addition that most election observers pointing out that these claims were baseless. starship.paint (exalt) 05:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint: The language in the article is very POV though which is inappropriate for wikipedia.. the cited source does not say they are baseless... lack of evidence is not the same thing. I'd just like to get the language more neutral and read less biased. It should say what her complaint is and then say something about the evidence. Spanneraol (talk) 14:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the wording to “Lake’s complaint alleged that there were hundreds of thousands of illegal votes in the election, but no evidence was provided”. Does that sound neutral to you? Take note that WP:NPOV does not require Wikipedia to produce a neutral position. NPOV requires us to neutrally reflect the position of reliable sources. If reliable sources say “green”, Wikipedia must follow and say “green”, we can’t say “colourless” … representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. - here the significant view is no evidence. starship.paint (exalt) 15:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That wording works for me, thanks. Spanneraol (talk) 17:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Spanneraol,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. Could you explain why you reverted my edits on the above page? They weren't intended to be vandalism. I genuinely thought that It would be useful to sort the acquired programs based on the country/network they came from. In addition, some of the acquired programs actually seem to be American shows that originate from The CW (based on their Wikipedia pages), such as Easy Money, In Harms Way, and Valentine.

I also noticed that many pages tend to separate miniseries from the other shows, which is why I did the same for "March"

194.80.233.40 (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to separate the programs by country.. if someone really needs to know where the show is from they can click on the link. The shows you mention were not produced by the CW... they were part of a deal where the CW sold airtime to MRC. If there were many mini-series maybe separating them makes sense but we don't need a separate section for just one show. Spanneraol (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Lehmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atlantic League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Monterey Amberjacks players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tucson Saguaros players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Prime Ticket's rebrand unimportant to the Spectrum SportsNet LA article? Your recent edit summary does not give any explanation or elaboration, making the edit look like an out-of-place, out-of-nowhere change that only serves as a detriment to the quality of the article. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Ticket was not rebranded until many years after the event in the article, thus it is not important to the narrative of SportsNet LA. The issue is that they had a deal with Prime Ticket and then signed a new contract with Time Warner.... what happened to Prime Ticket afterwards is meaningless and ads nothing other than confusion to the article. Spanneraol (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Fogarty (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Fogarty (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Garden City Wind, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Trinidad Triggers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 04:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Santa Fe Fuego, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technically I did not delete the articles for the Pecos League teams they have been moved to the draft space to allow editors to improve the articles without them being permanently deleted. The reason why they have been moved to the draft space is because they do not meet the requirements of WP:NTEAM / WP:NORG. They lack any independent secondary sources, which is a fundamental requirement of WP:GNG. If supported sources can be provided which satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements, I would be happy to reassess my position. Dan arndt (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gardencitywind.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roswell Invaders logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Santa Fe Fuego logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Trinidad Triggers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dodgers60logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Efraín Contreras has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable baseball player. Never made it to any major league. Playing for World Baseball or Pan American does not make a player notable enough for an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pacific Association of Professional Baseball indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Fischer (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Fischer (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mister @Spanneraol: between you and me, the point you were trying to point out when it said "In A Sense" was exactly the point I was trying to convey. I also used that Comic Book sites article for the sake of the opposing debaters who were also using the same place to make their point. Seems finding an actual reliable source for information these days for something like the shows we watch is in a sea of doubts and endless arguments. All the same thank you for trying to unbiasedly support the point I was attempting to make. If that's not what you were trying to do anyways, thanks all the same. Maxcardun (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Utica Pent Ups players has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Utica Pentups players has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Boyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Boyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ogden Raptors roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dominican Summer League Cardinals Red roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Da-Hung Cheng has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Texas Rangers minor league players into New York Mets minor league players. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spanneraol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Santa Fe Fuego, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw the page for Ryan Sherriff was updated to say he's retired; the cited source only says OKC transferred him to the Development List, and I couldn't find anything online to indicate retirement. Is there a source that states retirement? Just checking. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 03:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The transaction log yesterday said retired under his last event... it seems to have been changed since then. Spanneraol (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fort Wayne Generals players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Gray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Gray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spanneraol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Santa Fe Fuego".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom Pro Baseball League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom Pro Baseball League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2024 San Diego Padres season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spanneraol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garden City Wind, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I made the edits, I was referring to Zegler with Gal Gadot at the D23 Expo. There is available video footage of all the things I have mentioned. However, I'm not good at actually putting in the citations. The IMDb interview was also with Gadot. Hope that clears things up. Spaceshuttle88 (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you add negative or controversial information to an article you need to provide citations so people can check the quotes. Otherwise it can be removed. Spanneraol (talk) 02:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plymouth Pilgrims players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Freedom Pro Baseball League teams indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lake Bachar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spanneraol,

I'm posting a note about some articles on baseball players that you recently PROD'd. When you tagged these articles for proposed deletion, there was no notice placed on the User talk page of the article creator. You used Twinkle, which should have taken care of this for you so please check your Twinkle Preferences and make sure the box for "Notify page creator" is checked off. It's important, especially with PRODs, for article creators to be notified as the deletion rationale can often be a problem that they can address and then the tag can be removed. You used Twinkle to tag the page for deletion, which is great, so I think it is either a problem with the Preference for the editing tool or, for some reason, you unchecked the notification box. Please make sure with any future taggings that the page creator is notified. We do have a bot that will post a notice should the editor doing the tagging forget this step but it isn't 100% reliable. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure twinkle notified all the article creators for this group, except for a few which were articles that i created. Spanneraol (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spanneraol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trinidad Triggers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit on Bauer's page because you felt the details of the settlement were not relevant. This seems less than objective given there are no lack of derogatory details about an alleged assault that haven't aged particularly well in many regards. If alleged details about the assault are relevant, how can the details of the settlement not be relevant? I can appreciate your position as a Dodger fan... and I'm sure you probably don't care for the guy, but objectivity is objectivity. Mmcdonald767 (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has nothing to do with liking or disliking the guy, an entire paragraph about his dispute with Molly Knight is definitely excessive.Spanneraol (talk) 01:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then that's what edits are for. Revert is a bit heavy handed. There are no shortage of details about the allegation against they guy. In that light, the facts surrounding the settlement are every bit as exigent and relevant. I'm all for making whatever tweaks you might feel are appropriate but to dismiss it as irrelevant in it's entirety falls short on the smell test. Mmcdonald767 (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Except the Molly thing was covered in just a couple of sentences, it was not a settlement for the entire case... it was simply dropped... and since it wasn't really a key part of the whole controversy it doesnt warrant it's own section. it just says... he filed a complaint and it was dismissed.. that seems reasonable without giving it undue weight. If Anything the allegation section could probably be reduced further... I cut it back from what was way excessive previously already. Spanneraol (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good with that. That seems more objective to me. As a matter of fact, the settled case is probably the only thing in there to keep. The whole dropped business with deadspin et. al. was a total wash and so kinda immaterial to anything related to the settled allegation. It wasn't the same case and likely doesn't merit a new section. Mmcdonald767 (talk) 02:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Kansas City Cowboys (20th century baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § Kansas City Cowboys (20th century baseball) until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wes Blogg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Blogg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Valereee (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been widely accepted by the Dodgers themselves, Shohei on his IG, and the rest of MLB media. Reverting my edits, at this point, will only be counterproductive to Wikipedia's ability to update and spread correct information quicker. KillaTrav87 (talk) 21:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The deal is not official. The team has not made any announcement.. Physicals are failed occasionally which can scuttle the deal.. look at the discussion on the talk page. The Dodgers also do not have an available 40-man roster spot at the moment. Spanneraol (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this, I supported my own RfC because intros are supposed to be neutral. See WP:RFCNEUTRAL. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 23:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Moline Plow Boys players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Quad City River Bandits players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rock Island (minor league baseball) players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rock Island-Moline Islanders players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Spanneraol. So I have a bit of an issue with the page "Legacy of Roberto Clemente"; contrary to what the title says, it is nothing more than a list of quotes mention/praising Clemente which were mostly, if not entirely lifted from his Wikiquote page. What little relevant information on this page is already on "Roberto Clemente" (since that info was lifted from it) so I nominated it for deletion. However, there isn't much discussion on the page besides one person who votes "keep" on everything.

I was hoping, since you are a veteran at this thing, you would take a look at it and offer your opinion/vote. It is, IMO, an outlier amongst baseball pages and, as far as I can see, no athlete (regardless of sport) has such a page. Would be appreciated. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further adding: I created a Template:Roberto Clemente for a list of things or people associated with Clemente so this page has little purpose besides being a list of quotes. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spanneraol!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anniston (minor league baseball) players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Beaneaters seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Bees seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Doves seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Red Caps seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Red Stockings seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Rustlers seasons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brooklyn Robins executives has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. Smith (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Smith (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boston Bees minor league affiliates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:California Angels minor league affiliates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Houston Colt .45s minor league affiliates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Da-Hung Cheng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref blp

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]