User talk:Tango Mike Bravo

This user tries to assume good faith and hopes you will as well.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
21		High School for Gifted Students, Hanoi University of Science (talk)	Add sources
12		Carsten Müller (talk)	Add sources
359		Nguyễn dynasty (talk)	Add sources
14		Christine Buchholz (talk)	Add sources
2		Louis Soldan (talk)	Add sources
8		Paris by Night 91 (talk)	Add sources
792		Antiochus IV Epiphanes (talk)	Cleanup
8		Jenevieve Aken (talk)	Cleanup
9,967		Akshay Kumar (talk)	Cleanup
434		Imran Tahir (talk)	Expand
504		Chartism (talk)	Expand
4		Olga Tass (talk)	Expand
337		Wolfgang Schäuble (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4,356		Red states and blue states (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Timon Gremmels (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
257		Award (talk)	Merge
169		MoveOn (talk)	Merge
26,637		2020 Republican Party presidential primaries (talk)	Merge
4		Ali Lajami (talk)	Wikify
25		James Galanos (talk)	Wikify
57		Majed Abdullah (talk)	Wikify
5		Olusegun Adejumo (talk)	Orphan
5		Mfon Ekpo (talk)	Orphan
3		Raimond Beccarie de Pavie, Seigneur de Fourquevaux (talk)	Orphan
12		Majiziya Bhanu (talk)	Stub
16		Ulla Jelpke (talk)	Stub
73		Bernd Riexinger (talk)	Stub
4		Ghaffar Kazmi (talk)	Stub
28		Sevim Dağdelen (talk)	Stub
10		Ingo Wellenreuther (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Devere Rogers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage about them to pass WP:GNG, and with only 1 significant role (in My Spy), doesn't pass WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tango Mile Bravo

Thank you for creating The Box (Swedish TV series).

User:Atlantic306, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, can you please add a reference section detailing reviews of the series in reliable sources such as newspapers, magazines etc

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Atlantic306 (talk) 05:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Hi, thank you for the feedback/suggestion. I have looked, but have found no reviews so far. There is a page on Rotten Tomatoes but no rating. I have added a Reception section to the article that reads "As of 9 December 2021 Rotten Tomatoes had insufficient reviews to calculate a tomatometer rating.^[1]"

If this is not suitable please let me know. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks that's fine for now but as the reviews come in the ones from reliable sources should be detailed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Hi, periodically I've been updating as of when there were insufficient reviews. Recently I found the page on rotten tomatoes was missing and updated accordingly. Other editors have since deleted the whole of the text from the section but left the section heading. I am writing for your advice on whether to restore the text or delete the section entirely or something else. (I have added an archive URL to the reference in this section). Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's not customary to mention that there are no reviews at Rotten Tomatoes or elsewhere but I suggest it is worthwhile to keep the blank section as it may prompt other editors to help search for reviews. If you were not aware, reviews in any language are acceptable and welcolmed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Thank you. I will leave it as is. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I edited the Yogananda Pittman article to replace a dead link to an MSN.com page that had previously published an article from CBS News with a live link directly to the CBSNews.com original page of the article (that would have been a better link in the first place). You edited my ref tag to convert the link to a version at Archive.org , using an archive-url URL value instead of my CBSNews.com URL url value. Why point at Archive.org instead of to CBSNews.com ? If that were the best practice, then every link to outside Wikipedia would be archive-url at Archive.org . — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocRuby (talk • contribs) 12:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DocRuby Hi, thanks for the correction to the original CBS News article. I agree it would have been better. As to the addition of the archive-url, this is common practice. There are three parameters, archive-url, archive-date and url-status associated with an archive-url. If the original link is alive then url-status=live is used, otherwise url-status=dead. In the first case the reference is linked to the original live URL, which is the case here. However if the original link dies, it is easy to change the url-status=dead and the reference is linked to the archived version. Having the archived version recorded before the link goes dead is a safeguard. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that your edit retained my link to CBS News, but just added an archive link. Thanks for the improvement, and for pointing out your reasoning. DocRuby (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]