User talk:Winterstoke1

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but one of your recent edits made to Charles Norris Nicholson, has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charles Norris Nicholson was changed by Winterstoke1 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-03-31T11:47:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies: this was an error and not intentional. Winterstoke1 (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Somerset.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Somerset. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all articles relating to Somerset, which includes all subdivisions of the county, major buildings, roads and other related articles.

You can help by:

• Creating new articles.
• Expanding stubs.
• Adding photographs.
• Referencing articles.
• Research topics.
• Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somerset and someone will get back to you.

— Rod ^talk 07:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Peirse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a citation to a reliable source for this edit. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done: used the Oxford English Dictionary online page reference, but can also refer from that to many other sources. Winterstoke1 (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FozzieHey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mattia Binotto, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FozzieHey (talk) 15:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Clapham Junction rail crash does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. David Biddulph (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are confused about categorisation. Please read WP:Categorization#Articles, including WP:CATV and WP:CATDEF, and then reconsider your recent edits. - David Biddulph (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To add to that: regarding this edit, of what possible relevance is the category here? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If @Winterstoke1: doesn't reply with a reasonable explanation it can probably just be put up for CfD as most of the articles in it don't seem to be that closely linked to the subject. FozzieHey (talk) 23:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 23:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for referting my categories. I am trying to identify pages that relate specifically to Combe Down village. The Somerset and Dorset Railwy ran directly below the village through the famous Combe Down tunnel, which is why I applied the category to the relevant pages. I agree re the 1996 Channel Tunnel fire; however the page does mention Combe Down. I wish to maintain the categorisation for the Somerset & Dorset Railway and for several of the other pages that one or other of you has reverted. David Biddulph (talk) FozzieHey (talk) Redrose64 🌹 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winterstoke1 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain to us where in the article 1996 Channel Tunnel fire it mentions Combe Down? The vast proportion of the pages which you have added to the category do not belong. Are you going to revert them, or are you going to ask User:Redrose64 to do a global revert with his admin tools? --David Biddulph (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My error: it is a cross-reference to a list of transportation fires. --Winterstoke1 (talk) 23:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Winterstoke1.Before adding Categories to any more article, please read Wikipedia:categorization#Articles and note in particular where it says: A central concept used in categorizing articles is that of the defining characteristics of a subject of the article. A defining characteristic is one that reliable sources commonly and consistently define[1] the subject as having... Your Village is not a characteristic of most of the articles you have added to even if the subject is important to the village, the village is not important to the subject. the relationship is simply not equal. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK that makes sense. However, I maintain that if for example a building is built entirely of Combe Down stone, then that meets the defining characteristinc, whereby the village is important to the subject? I seem to have got involved with a gang of three here! and feel rather outnumbered by wikipedians. I will leave it up to you to decide whether I am making funamental errors in e ery category or whether some of my categorisations are relevant, eg, Harry Patch, who was born and bred in Combe Down.--Winterstoke1 (talk) 23:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Patch is fine because, as you say, there is a clear link from Harry to the village. For the more general articles, the lists and suchlike, a question to ask yourself when adding a category is "my village is the first to be added here ... how come no other towns/villages are in this category?". Wire723 (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for that Wire723 (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)--Winterstoke1 (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see I'm not the first to have encountered your enthusiastic WP:CATEGORISATION... Enthusiasm is good, but you have to remember that Wikipedia has 20 years of writing about settlements and in that time we've got a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn't - and some arbitrary conventions which may not always make sense, but they are conventions. So when you're writing about a village, you can be sure that there are 100,000's of editors who have done so before you, you are not the first. So it's a good idea to start by just having a look around to get a feel for what the conventions are. For something like building materials, I'd start with an article like St Paul's Cathedral, which is well known for being made of Portland stone and certainly has no shortage of editors working on the article - but is not categorised by building material. So that's a pretty good hint that it's probably not generally considered a WP:DEFINING characteristic. Another way to think of WP:DEFINING is - is this one of the 3 most important things to know about a subject? For most buildings that generally means where it is, what it's used for, and maybe when it was built or who designed it. Combe Down is not one of the three most important things to know about Somerset, so that article should not have Combe Down as a category. So in general - don't try to reinvent the wheel. Have a look at the articles and categories for other Somerset villages - ie Category:Populated places in Somerset - to get a feel for how it's done, there's plenty of work just to bring them up to the standard of Category:GA-Class_Somerset_articles, without heading off on new tacks. Le Deluge (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes U give in. I have been told off enough now. Thanks for explaining again. Winterstoke1 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]