Module talk:Footnotes

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Push to clear the last few ones.

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Bot requests#Help clear Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"n.d.a" vs. "n.d. a"

[edit]

At Capri-Sun, I have two references that I'd written as {{harvnb|Capri Sun Group|n.d. a}} and {{harvnb|Capri Sun Group|n.d. b}}. I could've sworn they worked as intended when they were added, but maybe I just overlooked this before, because I don't spot anything relevant in the history. Either way, as it stands, these render as "Capri Sun Group & n.d. a" and ""Capri Sun Group & n.d. b", which appears to be because L131 is expecting no space before the disambiguating letter. But I don't think most people would write "n.d.a", which looks like the a is part of an acronym. "n.d. a" is much clearer. I would suggest that both should be allowed, as should "nd a" in contrast to "nda". I believe all we'd have to do is add a  ? before the %l on lines 65, 66, 131, and 132. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 03:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those references appear to be working as expected and I'm seeing them displayed with a space between n.d. and the disambiguation. What error message are you seeing? It may have to do with the script you're using -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 11:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ActivelyDisinterested: The issue isn't the space falling to render; it's the ampersand showing up because the module reads "n.d. a" as a name rather than a date -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 14:27, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Capri Sun Group n.d.a
Capri Sun Group n.d.b
Capri Sun Group 1997a
Without spaces ↑
Capri Sun Group & n.d. a
Capri Sun Group & n.d. b
Capri Sun Group & 1997 a
With spaces ↑ Rjjiii (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a space makes the module read it as a name rather than a date, and this put an ampersand before it. What I'm saying is that, while that's reasonable for years like 1997a, for n.d. in particular a space should be understood as part of the date. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 15:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry misconstrued the issue. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 15:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the pre-module version of the harv/sfn templates always treated the final parameter as the year, Rjjiii (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin & ActivelyDisinterested:
APA uses n.d.-x. It seems like Chicago and Harvard referencing do as well. I've added the pattern for that to the sandbox module:
Live
Capri Sun Group & n.d.-a
Sandbox
Capri Sun Group n.d.-a
But you'd also need to add support in Module:Citation/CS1. Right now it gives an error if you suffix anything to n.d. separated by a hyphen or space (only Capri Sun Group n.d.a works):
  • Capri Sun Group (n.d.). "Frequently Asked Questions". Capri-Sun.com.
  • Capri Sun Group (n.d.a). "Frequently Asked Questions". Capri-Sun.com.
  • Capri Sun Group (n.d. a). "Frequently Asked Questions". Capri-Sun.com. {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • Capri Sun Group (n.d.-a). "Frequently Asked Questions". Capri-Sun.com. {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Also some stats while thinking about changes:
I'd support adding support to both modules for "n.d.-" if that's the norm in published citation styles. Rjjiii (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Continued at: Help_talk:Citation_Style_1#"n.d.a",_"n.d._a",_or_"n.d.-a" Rjjiii (talk) 03:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So far, no response at all over there. Idk if it's a good idea to add support for a type of date in only one of the modules. Rjjiii (talk) 04:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to whack down the amount of articles in this Category and have come across a List that I can't find any Harv errors or Harv warnings in, and yet here is List of fictional diseases listed amongst the error'fied articles. Can anyone tell me why? Thanks - Shearonink (talk) 03:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a false positive, because {{Cite MW}} is a template that wraps {{cite web}}, and this module didn't know about it yet. I'll fix. Please feel free to report any such mysterious false positives here. Thanks for cleaning all of this up! — hike395 (talk) 07:19, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Trappist script doesn’t flag false positives but the css modification (as described on the error page) does.
Andy02124 (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you guys for looking into it. Btw the Category has now inched up to 85.1% fixed/empty. Seems like it had been at a straight 85% for forever... - Shearonink (talk) 15:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two additions

[edit]

I use these templates pretty often and have had several issues that have led me here. Can the following be added to the whitelist: Template:Lagomorphs2018, Template:HMW2016 Volume 6 ['CITEREFSmithJohnstonAlvesHackländer2018'] = {'Lagomorphs2018'}

['CITEREFWilsonLacherMittermeier2016'] = {'HMW2016 Volume 6'} -- Reconrabbit 17:24, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]