Quasi-syllogism

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Quasi-syllogism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Quasi-syllogism is a categorical syllogism where one of the premises is singular, and thus not a categorical statement.^[1]

For example:

1. All men are mortal
2. Socrates is a man
3. Socrates is mortal

In the above argument, while premise 1 is a categorical, premise 2 is a singular statement referring to one individual. While this is a valid logical form, it is not strictly a categorical syllogism.

Of course, it has been suggested that you can translate any singular statement into a categorical.

For example:

1. Socrates is a man
2. All members of a class of which the only member is Socrates are men

The above two premises may be considered identical, but the first is a singular and the second is a categorical.

• Transitivity of hyponymy
• Type of syllogism (disjunctive, hypothetical, legal, poly-, prosleptic, quasi-, statistical)