Template talk:Music genres

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

What, exactly, is intended by the inclusion of the nonexistant Local sounds on this template?Arturus 01:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's because thearticle was deleted recently. Circeus 01:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

It strikes me as odd that this template links to lists rather than articles. For example, it seems that it would make much more sense to link to blues than List of genres of the blues. Agent 86 03:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Indie has quite a large following in western countries such as Australia, USA, Canada and especially the UK, therefore it seems relevant to add a link to the article Indie (music). Napierg 02:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funk????

[edit]

Don't you think funk should be included? It is a major genre and is not a sub-genre of any other genre. ''I Am The Master Of All Thunder'' (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post-Industrial as its own movement?

[edit]

As far as I've checked, the post-industrial 'movement' in itself is not significantly different enough from a broader 'electronic' movement to put it on it's own. Really now, rivethead supremicists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jotsko (talkcontribs) 03:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Small cleanup needed, please.

[edit]

Is there any way to get rid of both the ")" marks at the end of the template? There are two parentheses next to the word "soul" in the box. I don't think they should be there, but I'm having trouble getting rid of them. Can somebody please help me? Thank you for your understanding & cooperation. Mr. Brain (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]